Fig. 1. Map of cognitive processing of social information

Fig. 2. Assessment of “intrapersonal problems and health problems” and “problems associated with Internet addiction” symptoms with different types of perceptions and moral organization of the mediated world

Fig. 3. Diagrams of assessment scope of “Response Evaluation” and “Behaviour” with different types of perception and moral organization of the surrounding world

Table 1. Major psychometric assessments on the Basic Belief Scale questionnaire (BBS) in females and males, and differences

Scale	Whole Sample		Males		Females		Differences
	Me	SD	Me	SD	Me	SD	t	p
BBS 1	6,51	2,65	6,48	2,77	6,53	2,54	-0,142	0,887
BBS 2	4,40	2,77	4,34	2,64	4,47	2,90	-0,306	0,760
BBS 3	6,41	3,18	6,49	3,04	6,33	3,32	0,329	0,743
BBS 4	7,96	2,57	7,72	2,77	8,16	2,35	-1,125	0,262
BBS 5	6,71	2,47	6,95	2,45	6,47	2,48	1,304	0,194

BBS 1 –Benevolence of the mediated world, BBS 2 – fairness of mediated world, BBS 3 – Positive I-image, BBS 4 – faith in luck, BBS 5 – belief in control over life.

Table 2. Major psychometric assessments on Fair-Care Scale in females and males, and differences

Scale	Whole Sample		Males		Females		Differences
	Me	SD	Me	SD	Me	SD	t	p
FPA	2,21	0,75	2,28	0,80	2,20	0,71	0,261	0,794
FPI	2,40	0,79	2,36	0,84	2,45	0,74	-0,713	0,477
FСF	2,77	0,78	2,70	0,80	2,86	0,75	-1,170	0,244
FСS	2,68	0,77	2,66	0,72	2,70	0,82	-0,349	0,727
FPS	3,74	0,86	3,56	0,83	3,92	0,85	-2,885	0,004
FPU	3,46	0,79	3,49	0,78	3,43	0,80	0,454	0,650
CS-cP	2,82	0,80	2,86	0,82	2,78	0,79	0,699	0,486
CS-cO	3,34	0,82	3,22	0,87	3,46	0,76	-2,003	0,047
CS-sR	3,44	0,75	3,42	0,73	3,46	0,77	0,400	0,690
CS-sC	3,19	0,84	3,08	0,87	3,29	0,81	-1,664	0,098
CS-rP	3,10	0,58	3,01	0,58	3,19	0,56	-2,007	0,046

Fairness. 1. Preconventional level: FPA – power of authorities, fear of punishment; FPI – instrumental exchange «you – to me, I – to you». 2. Convention: FСF – focus on the opinions of others, the desire “to be good»; FСS – Social law and order. 3. Postconventional level: FPS – social contact, importance of individual rights; FPU – stage of universal ethical principles. Care. 1. Self-concern; CS-cP – focus on the self and personal interests; CS-cO – focus on the opinions of others and good opinion of the self. 2. Self-sacrifice: CS-sR – reflexive empathic orientation; CS-sC – concern of internalized values, protecting the rights of others. 3. Self-respect: CS-rP – perceived concern of internalized values.

Table 3. Cluster centers of respondents according to the perception of the world and perceiving the self in this world

	Name	Type 1	Type 2	Type 3
Benevolence of the mediated world	BBS 1	5	5	9
Fairness of the mediated world	BBS 2	3	3	7
Positive I-image	BBS 3	3	8	8
Faith in luck	BBS 4	6	9	9
Belief in control over life	BBS 5	5	7	8
Power of authorities, fear of punishment	FPA	2,3	2,2	2,1
Instrumental exchange	FPI	2,5	2,4	2,3
Focus on the opinions of others	FСF	2,7	2,8	2,8
Social law and order	FСS	2,5	2,8	2,7
Social contact, importance of individual rights	FPS	3,7	3,8	3,8
Stage of universal ethical principles	FPU	3,3	3,5	3,6
Focus on the self and personal interests	CS-cP	2,9	2,9	2,7
Focus on the opinions of others	CS-cO	3,3	3,3	3,4
Reflexive empathic orientation	CS-sR	3,2	3,4	3,6
Concern of internalized values	CS-sC	3,1	3,0	3,4
Perceived concern of internalized values	CS-rP	3,0	3,0	3,3
Respondents		58	57	60

Table 4. Females and males by type of world view and basic moral regulation

	Type 1	Type 2	Type 3
Males	32,6%	32,6%	34,8%
Females	33,7%	32,6%	33,7%

Table 5. Average scores of different aspects of Internet addiction in adolescents with different types of perception and moral regulation in the mediated world, and differences

	Type 1	Type 2	Type 3	Differences
				K-W	p
Compulsive Symptoms	9,11	8,19	8,47	2,601	0,272
Withdrawal Symptoms	9,98	9,35	9,13	1,924	0,382
Symptoms of Tolerance	7,09	6,30	6,98	4,525	0,104
Intrapersonal and health problems	11,12	9,72	9,36	5,746	0,057
Time Management problems	8,51	7,56	7,97	3,119	0,210
Main Symptoms of Internet Adddiction	26,18	23,84	24,58	2,034	0,362
Internet addiction problems	19,63	17,28	17,78	5,298	0,071
Total Score of Internet Addiction	45,81	41,12	42,37	3,723	0,155

Table 6. Average scores of cognitive assessment in adolescents with different types of perception and moral regulation in the mediated world, and differences

	Type 1	Type 2	Type 3	Differences
				K-W	P
Perception	22,71	22,23	22,20	0,733	0,693
Interpretation	22,03	22,07	22,00	0,041	0,980
Response	21,47	22,46	22,77	4,416	0,110
Response Evaluation	22,52	22,37	23,63	6,941	0,031
Behaviour	22,52	23,30	24,27	5,198	0,074

References:

Bochaver A.A., & Khlomov K.D. (2014). Cyberbullying: Harassment in Modern Technologies. Psychology. [Zhurnal vysshey shkoly ekonomiki], 11(3), 177–191.

Crick N.R., & Dodge K.A. (1994). A review and reformulation of social information-processing mechanisms in children’s social adjustment. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 74–101. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.115.1.74

Dodge K.A., Malone P.S., Lansford J.E., Sorbring E., Skinner A.T., Tapanya S., Uribe Tirado L.M., Zelli A., Alampay L.P., Al-Hassan S.M., Bacchini D., Bombi A.S., Bornstein M.H., Chang L., Deater-Deckard K., Di Giunta L., Oburu P., & Pastorelli C. (2015). Hostile attributional bias and aggressive behavior in global context. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112, 9310–9315. doi:10.1073/pnas.1418572112.

Erdley C.A., Rivera, M.S., Shepherd E.J., i Holleb L.J. (2010). Social-Cognitive Models and Skills. In: D. W. Nangle, D. J. Hansen, C. A. Erdley i P. J. Norton (ur.), Practitioner’s Guide to Empirically Based Measures of Social Skills, 21–35. New York: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-0609-0_2

Granovetter M. (2009). The strength of weak ties. [Ekonomicheskya sotsiologiya], 10(4), 31–50.

Janoff-Bulman R. (1985). The aftermath of victimisation: Rebuilding shattered assumption. In C.R.Figley (Ed.) Trauma and its wake. N.Y., Brunner/ Mazel, 15–35.

Kalmykova E.S., & Padun M.A. (2002). Early attachment and its impact on resistance to mental trauma. [Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal], 5(23), 51–59.

Kulikova T.I., & Maliy D.V. (2015). The correlation between a passion for computer.

Laghi F., Schneider B.H., Vitoroulis I. at al. (2013). Knowing when not to use the Internet: Shyness and adolescents’ on-line and off-line interactions with friends. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 51–57. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.07.015

Lemerise E. A., & Arsenio W. F. (2000). An integrated model of emotion processes and cognition in social information processing. Child Development, 71, 107–118. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00124

Livingstone S., Haddon L., Görzig A. and Ólafsson K. (2011). Risks and safety on the internet: The perspective of European children: Full findings. Retrieved from http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/33731/ (appeal date: 12.15.2018).

Martsinkovskaya T.D. (2012). Information socialization in a changing information space. [Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya],5(26), 7. Retrieved from: http://psystudy.ru/num/2012v5n26/766-martsinkovskaya26.html. (appeal date: 12.15.2018).

Molchanov S.V. (2011). Morality of justice and morality of care: foreign and domestic approaches to moral development. [Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta], Series 14. Psychology, 14(2), 59–72.

Molchanov S.V. (2016). Psychology of adolescence and adolescence. Moscow, Yurayt.

Molchanov S.V. (2017). Personal factors of acceptance of moral responsibility in adolescence. National Psychological Journal, 4, 114–120. doi: 10.11621/ npj.2017.0411

Molchanov S.V., Almazova O.V., Poskrebysheva N.N., & Zapunidi A.A. (2017). Personal autonomy as a factor in the development of adolescent responsibility. National Psychological Journal,1, 84–90. doi: 10.11621/npj.2017.0110

Rasskazova E.I., Emelin V.A., & Tkhostov A.Sh. (2015). Diagnosis of the psychological consequences of the influence of information technology on a person. Moscow, Akropolis.

Roulann E.G. (2012). How to stop bullying at school. Mobbing psychology. Moscow, Genesis.

Sebastian Ludwig Hirn, Joachim Thomas, & Christof Zoelch (2018). The role of empathy in the development of social competence: a study of German school leavers. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth. 1–13. doi: 10.1080/02673843.2018.1548361.

Soldatova G.U. (2018). Digital socialization in the cultural-historical paradigm: a changing child in a changing world. [Sotsial’naya psikhologiya i obshchestvo], 9(3), 71–80.

Soldatova G.U., & Rasskazova E.I. (2017). «The downside» of digital competence of Russian adolescents: the illusion of competence and risky behavior online. [Voprosy psikhologii], 3, 3–15.

Spitzer M. (2014). Antimazg: digital technology and the brain. Moscow, AST.

Trekels, J., Ward, L.M., Eggermont, S. (2018). I “like” the way you look: How appearance-focused and overall Facebook use contribute to adolescents’ self-sexualization. Computers in Human Behavior, 81, 198–208. doi: doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.12.020

Turkle, Sh. (1996). Parallel lives: Working on identity in virtual space. Constructing the self in a mediated world. Inquiries in social construction. Grodin D., Lindlof T.R. (Eds.). Sage Publications, Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA, US, 156–175. 10.4135/9781483327488.n10

Voiskounsky, A.E. (2010). Internet Addiction in the Context of Positive Psychology. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 3, 541–549. doi: 10.11621/ pir.2010.0026

Voiskunsky, A.E. (2017). Directions of research mediated by the Internet activities. [Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta]. Series 14. Psychology, 1, 51–66.

Voyskunsky A.E. (2014). Social perception in social networks. [Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta]. Series 14. Psychology, 2, 90–104.

Voyskunsky A.E. (2017). Distribution of assistance in the information society. [Gosudarstvo i grazhdane v elektronnoy srede]. Issue 1. St. Petersburg, Universitet ITMO, 308–314.

Voyskunsky A.E. (Ed.) (2009). Internet addiction: psychological dependence and dynamics of development. Moscow, Ackropolis.

Wilson, B.J. (1985). Developmental differences in empathy with a television protagonist’s fear. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 39, 284–299. doi: 10.1016/0022-0965(85)90042-6

Young, K.S. (1998). Internet addiction: The emergence of a new clinical disorder. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 3(1), 237–244. doi: 10.1089/ cpb.1998.1.237