ISSN 2079-6617
eISSN 2309-9828
Intercultural analysis of value orientations of Wikipedia authors

Intercultural analysis of value orientations of Wikipedia authors

PDF (Rus)

Recieved: 02/12/2020

Accepted: 02/28/2020

Published: 03/31/2020

p.: 3-17

DOI: 10.11621/npj.2020.0101

Keywords: Wikipedia; free knowledge; online community; virtual volunteering; prosocial behaviour and thinking; value orientations (VO)

Available online: 31.03.2020

To cite this article:

Bryzgalin Evgeniy A.. Intercultural analysis of value orientations of Wikipedia authors. // National Psychological Journal 2020. 1. p.3-17. doi: 10.11621/npj.2020.0101

Copied to Clipboard

Issue 1, 2020

Bryzgalin Evgeniy A. Lomonosov Moscow State University


Background. A wide circle of multidisciplinary researchers share interest in motivation factors of Wikipedians, i.e. virtual volunteers, members of the online world’s largest online encyclopedia «Wikipedia», who consolidate personal resources to manage comprehensive aggregation of free knowledge. Nevertheless, the question of the driving forces of this prosocial behaviour is still open.

Objective. It is assumed that for a full understanding of the determined online activities of Wikipedians we need to analyze the value orientations to which they give personal preference. In accordance with this, the following goal was set: to identify the shared values of the experienced transnational core of Wikipedia authors.

Design. Based on the semantic units derived from previous cycles of disparate academic studies of Wikipedia’s practical development, we conducted a content analysis of a transnational survey. The recipients were 65 authors of multilingual Wikipedia segments (83% males and 17% females) with average experience of 9.9 years compilation of encyclopedic articles.

Results. The constitutive system of invariant internal and external value orientations characteristic of Wikipedians is disclosed. It is found that in the most cases Wikipedians find a number of personal significant reasons for participating in the Wikipedia, the reasons resonating with their inner essence.

Conclusion. The internal value orientations of Wikipedians include: self-development (self-improvement, self-assertion, self-realization); reciprocal (mutual) altruism; a tendency to high quality and systematization of knowledge; a pleasure of creation; autonomy; recreation (hobby, entertainment); meaningfulness; preservation of personal heritage. The external value orientations include: preservation and development of the cultural heritage / language segment; promotion and popularization of Wikipedia (its ideology and principles); low transaction costs and convenience (attractiveness) of the system; affiliation; social identity; improvement peace («Weltverbesserungs Antrieb»); building bridges between cultures and languages. It is summarized that a detailed study of the identified value orientations and also other psychological characteristics of Wikipedia volunteers can significantly expand theoretical concepts of functioning and the applied value for the organization of volunteer practices to disseminate knowledge as the highest value of humanity.

Table 1. Research results of internal values

Internal Values (N=65)

Absolute frequency (N)

Relative frequency (%)

Specific gravity (k)














Altruism (as a reciprocal exchange of knowledge)




Trend towards high quality and systematization of knowledge




The pleasure of creation








Recreation (hobby. entertainment)








Preservation of personal heritage




Table 2. Research results of external values

Internal Values (N=65)

Absolute frequency (N)

Relative frequency (%)

Specific gravity (k)

Preservation and development of the cultural heritage / language segment




Promotion and popularization of Wikipedia (ideology and principles)




Low transaction costs and convenience (attractiveness) of the system








Social Identity




«Weltverbesserungs Antrieb» (World improvement drive)




Building bridges between cultures and languages





Agadullina E.R. (2013). Collective actions: predictors and models. [Sotsial’naya psikhologiya i obshchestvo], 4(3), 42–51.

Adilova E.T., Aimaganbetova O.Kh., & Kasym L. (2019). The main theoretical and methodological approaches to the study of the concepts of “value” and “value orientation”. [Vestnik KazNU]. Series “Psychology and sociology”, 68(1), 252–264.

Almaev N.A., & Malkova G.Yu. (2006). Content-analytical study of personality. [Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki], 1(3), 20–42.

Alkhasov A.A. (2015). Max Scheler on the hierarchy of values. [Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul’turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki], 5–2, 13–15.

Ananyev B.G. (2001). On the problems of modern human knowledge. St. Petersburg, Piter.

Asmolov A.G., & Asmolov G.A. (2019). Internet as a generative space: historical and evolutionary perspective. [Voprosy psikhologii], 4, 1–26.

Bratus B.S. (2019). Anomalies of personality. The psychological approach. Moscow, Litres.

Bryzgalin E.A. (2019). Specific features of the self-determined activity of the authors of the Russian-language Wikipedia. In eds. I.A. Aleshkovsky, A.V. Andriyanov, & E.A. Antipov [Materialy Mezhdunarodnogo molodezhnogo nauchnogo foruma Lomonosov-2019]. Moscow, Max Press.

Bryzgalin E.A., Voiskunsky A.E., & Kozlovsky S.A. (2018). Cognitive-style features of Wikipedia authors: analytic vs holistic approach. [Materialy Vserossiyskoy konferentsii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem po kognitivnoy nauke «Kognitivnye issledovaniya na sovremennom etape» (KISE-2018)]. Arkhangelsk, NArFU, 39–42.

Bryzgalin E.A., Voiskunsky A.E., & Kozlovsky S.A. (2019). Psychological analysis of practical experience in developing an online encyclopedia Wikipedia. [Sibirskiy psikhologicheskiy zhurnal], 73, 17–39. doi: 10.17223/17267080/73/2

Bryzgalin E.A., Voiskunsky A.E., & Kozlovsky S.A. (2018). Meaningful life orientations of Wikipedia authors (on the example of the Russian-language segment). In eds. E.Yu. Patyaeva, & E.I. Shlyagina [Lichnost’ v epokhu peremen: mobilis in mobili : materialy mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii 17–18 dekabrya 2018]. Moscow, Smysl, 205–208.

Bryzgalin E.A., Voiskunsky A.E., & Kozlovsky S.A. (2019). An existential psychological study of the authors of the Russian-language section of Wikipedia. [Informatsionnoe obshchestvo: obrazovanie, nauka, kul’tura i tekhnologii budushchego : trudy 22oy Mezhdunarodnoy ob»edinennoy nauchnoy konferentsii «Internet i sovremennoe obshchestvo», IMS-2019, Sankt-Peterburg, 19–22 iyunya 2019 g.]. Collection of scientific articles, 3. St. Petersburg, Universitet ITMO, 173–189.

Budinaite G.L., Kornilova T.V. (1993). Personal values and personal prerequisites of the subject. [Voprosy psikhologii],14(5), 99–105.

Castells M. (2019). Information era. Economics, society and culture. Moscow, Litres.

Csikszentmihalyi M., Latter F., & Duranso K.V. (2018). Running in the stream. Moscow, Mann, Ivanov and Ferber.

Emelin V.A. (2018). Cyber culture and network libertarianism. National Psychological Journal, 3(31), 3–11. doi: 10.11621/npj.2018.0301

Fichman, P., & Hara, N. (2014). Global Wikipedia. International and cross-cultural issues in online collaboration. Lanham, M.D., Rowman & Littlefield.

Frankl V.E. (1984). Der leidende Mensch. Anthropologische Grundlagen der Psychothérapie. Bern, Huber.

Frankl V. (2012). Man in search of meaning. Moscow, Kniga po trebovaniyu.

Jorgensen, R.F. (2013).  Framing the net – the internet and human rights. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing.

Kozlovsky S.A., Bagdasarova S.A., Medeyko V.V., & Tsapenko A.M. (2018). Open heritage: the interaction of wiki communities and cultural institutions to promote cultural heritage: a methodological manual. Moscow, Astro Design.

Leontiev D.A. (2000). The inner world of personality. [Psikhologiya lichnosti v trudakh otechestvennykh psikhologov], St. Petersburg: Peter, 372–377.

Leontiev D.A. (2017). Self-realization and the essential forces of man. In eds. D.A. Leontiev, & V.G. Schur [Psikhologiya s chelovecheskim litsom: gumanisticheskaya perspektiva v postsovetskoy psikhologii], Moscow, Litres.

Leontiev D.A. (1996). Value as an interdisciplinary concept: the experience of multidimensional reconstruction. [Voprosy filosofii], 4, 15–26.

Langle A.A., Ukolova E.M., & Shumsky V.B. (2018). Modern existential analysis. History, theory, practice, research. Moscow, Yurait.

Maralov V.G. (2015). The value and dangers of personal self-development. [Mezhdunarodnyy nauchno-issledovatel’skiy zhurnal], 6(37), Part 4, 51–53.

Matei S. A & Britt B. C. (2017). Structural differentiation in social media: adhocracy, entropy, and the «1% effect». Berlin, Springer.

Mukhina V.S. (2007). Personality: myths and reality. Yekaterinburg, Intellight.

Nugaeva O.G., & Krivodonova Yu.E. (2012). The psychological essence and correlation of the concepts of “value” and “value orientation”. [Spetsial’noe obrazovanie]. 2, 120–128.

Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic Psychological Needs in Motivation Development and Wellness. New York, NY : Guilford Press.

Semechkin N.I. (2014). Psychology of social groups. Moscow, Direktmedia,

Smyslova O.V. (2001). Analysis of ideas of hackers’ motivation. [Materialy mezhdunarodnoy Internet-konferentsii «Sotsial’nye i psikhologicheskie posledstviya primeneniya informatsionnykh tekhnologiy»]. Moscow, 47–58.

Šimleša, M., Guegan, J., Blanchard, E., Tarpin-Bernard, F., & Buisine, S. (2018). The flow engine framework: a cognitive model of optimal human experience. Europe’s journal of psychology, 14(1), 232–253. doi: 10.5964/ejop.v14i1.1370

Slivko O., Kummer M. & Zhang X.M. (2019). Unemployment and Digital Public Goods Contribution. Information Systems Research.

Stephens C. (1996). Modelling reciprocal altruism. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 47(4), 533–551. doi: 10.1093/bjps/47.4.533

Turner D. (2003). Social influence. St. Petersburg, Piter.

Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories: Studies in social psychology. Cambridge, England, Cambridge University Press.

Trivers R. L. (2010). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Moral psychology: Historical and contemporary readings, 124–134.

Tkacz, N. (2015). Wikipedia and the Politics of Openness. Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press. doi: 10.7208/chicago/9780226192444.001.0001

Van Dijk, J. (2012). The network society. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage Publications.

Voyskunsky A.E. (2017). Research directions of Internet-mediated activities. [Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta]. Series 14: Psychology, 1, 51–66.

Voyskunsky A.E. (2010). Psychological studies of hackers. [Psikhologiya i Internet]. Moscow, Akropol’, 211–248.

Walker C. J. (2010). Experiencing flow: Is doing it together better than doing it alone? The Journal of Positive Psychology, 5(1), 3–11. doi: 10.1080/17439760903271116

Wang, J., Zhang, R., Hao, J. X., & Chen, X. (2019). Motivation factors of knowledge collaboration in virtual communities of practice: a perspective from system dynamics. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(3), 466–488. doi: 10.1108/JKM-02-2018-0061

Yadov V.A. et al. (2013). Self-regulation and prediction of social behavior of a person: dispositional concept. Moscow, TsSPiM.

Yanitsky M.S. et al. (2019). The system of value orientations of “Generation Z”: social, cultural, and demographic determinants. [Sibirskiy psikhologicheskiy zhurnal], 72, 46–67. doi: /10.17223/17267080/72/3

Yanitsky M.S. (2005). Features of mass communication preferences depending on the type of individual value system. [Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta], 2, 195–198.

Yanitsky M.S. (2000). Value orientations of personality as a dynamic system. Kemerovo, Kuzbassvuzizdat.

To cite this article:

Bryzgalin Evgeniy A.. Intercultural analysis of value orientations of Wikipedia authors. // National Psychological Journal 2020. 1. p.3-17. doi: 10.11621/npj.2020.0101

Copied to Clipboard