ISSN 2079-6617
eISSN 2309-9828
Typological Features of Academic Achievement Resources in Relation to Different School Engagement Profiles during Different Periods of Education

Typological Features of Academic Achievement Resources in Relation to Different School Engagement Profiles during Different Periods of Education

PDF (Rus)

Recieved: 10/10/2023

Accepted: 11/20/2023

Published: 12/10/2023

Keywords: individual-typological profiles; conscious self-regulation; school engagement; academic motivation; personality features; academic achievement

p.: 188-205

DOI: 10.11621/npj.2023.0416

Available online: 10.12.2023

To cite this article:

Potanina Anna M., Tsyganov Igor Yu., Morosanova Varvara I.. Typological Features of Academic Achievement Resources in Relation to Different School Engagement Profiles during Different Periods of Education. // National Psychological Journal 2023. 4. p.188-205. doi: 10.11621/npj.2023.0416

Copied to Clipboard

Copy
Issue 4, 2023

Potanina Anna M. Federal Scientific Center of Psychological and Multidisciplinary Research

Tsyganov Igor Yu. Federal Scientific Center of Psychological and Multidisciplinary Research

Morosanova Varvara I. Federal Scientific Center of Psychological and Multidisciplinary Research

Abstract

Background. Presented work was carried out in the context of an individual typological approach to the analysis of psychological characteristics that ensure students’ academic achievement. Despite the large amount of data regarding the influence of school engagement on academic success, there is a lack of knowledge about the age specificity of its typological features and their connection with the psychological resources of academic performance.

Objectives. The study aimed to identify individual typological specificity of academic achievement resources depending on the profile of school engagement in different periods of study at middle and high school.

Methods. V.I. Morosanova’s “The Self-Regulation Profile of Learning Activity Questionnaire (SRPLAQ)”; “A Multidimensional School Engagement Scale” (Wang et al., 2019; Russian adaptation by Fomina, Morosanova, 2020); Russian version of Big Five Questionnaire — Children version (BFQ-C) (Malykh et al., 2015); “Academic Motivation Scale — School (AMS-S)” questionnaire (Gordeeva et al., 2017); “Attitude towards learning in middle and high school” questionnaire (Bondarenko, Tsyganov, Morosanova, 2018 modification of the “Technique for diagnostics of learning motivation and emotional attitude to learning in secondary and high school” by Andreeva, Prikhozhan, 2006). The average score in main school subjects was used as an indicator of academic achievement.

Sample. The sample consisted of 1056 students of 5–11 grades from Moscow and Kaluga (10–18 years, mean age — 13.9 years, 42.3% female).

Results. The results revealed two profiles, replicated in groups of students throughout middle and high school: “Highly engaged” and “Disengaged”. Highly engaged students, regardless of the period of education, are characterized by a high level of conscious self-regulation, a positive motivational and emotional attitude to learning, high achievement motivation, extraversion, conscientiousness and openness to experience. It is shown that in grades 5–6, academic performance in both groups is ensured by self-regulation and personality traits; in grades 7–8, attitude to learning also becomes a resource for academic achievement; and in grades 9–11, student performance is also supported by academic motivation. The performance of highly engaged students in all periods of education is supported by general level of conscious self-regulation. Meanwhile analysis of disengaged groups revealed contribution of different regulatory components to academic performance.

Conclusion. The study provides empirical data on the age specificity of the typological aspects of regulatory and personal resources of academic performance. Further studies might be aimed at analyzing changes in individual trajectories of student engagement using longitudinal data, as well as identifying factors that influence them.

References

Andreeva, A.D., Prikhozhan, A.M. (2006) Methods of diagnostics of learning motivation and emotional attitude to learning in middle and high school. Psikhologicheskaya diagnostika (Psychological Diagnostics), 1, 33–38. (In Russ.).

Bondarenko, I.N., Tsyganov, I.Yu., Morosanova, V.I. (2018). Factor structure of the questionnaire “Attitude to learning in middle and high school”. Personality, intelligence, metacognitions: research approaches and educational practices. Materials of the III International Scientific and Practical Conference (pp. 3–9) on April 19–21, 2018. Kaluga, Russia., Russia. Kaluga: IP Yakunin A.V. (In Russ.).

Bondarenko, I.N., Tsyganov, I.Yu., Morosanova, V.I. (2022). The role of conscious self-regulation in the dynamics of cognitive activity and cognitive engagement of students during the transition from secondary to high school: a longitudinal study.

Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Seriya 14. Psikhologiya (Lomonosov Psychology Journal), 4, 200–223. https://doi.org/10.11621/ vsp.2022.04.09 (In Russ.).

Gordeeva, T.O., Sychev, O.A., Gizhitskii, V.V, Gavrichenkova, T.K. (2017). Intrinsic and extrinsic academic motivation scale for schoolchildren. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie (Psychological Science and Education), 22(2), 65–74 https://doi. org/10.17759/ pse.2017220206 (In Russ.).

Morosanova, V.I. (2020). Development of a resource approach to the study of conscious self-regulation of achieving goals and self-development of a person. In V.I. Morosanova, Yu.P. Zinchenko (Eds.) Psychology of self-regulation: evolution of approaches and challenges of time: A collective monograph (pp. 11–37). Moscow : Psychological Institute of the Russian Academy of Education, (In Russ.).

Morosanova, V.I. (2021). Conscious self-regulation as a meta-resource for achieving goals and solving the problems of human activity. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Seriya 14. Psikhologiya (Lomonosov Psychology Journal), 1, 3–37. https://doi. org/10.11621/vsp.2021.01.01 (In Russ.).

Morosanova, V.I., Bondarenko, I.N. (2017). Diagnostics of conscious self-regulation of educational activity: a new version of the SPLAQ-M questionnaire. Teoreticheskaya i eksperimental’naya psikhologiya (Theoretical and Experimental Psychology), 10(2), 27–37. (In Russ.).

Morosanova, V.I., Bondarenko, I.N., Fomina, T.G. (2020). Age differences in conscious self-regulation of learning activity in relation to academic motivation, personality characteristics of students and the their learning results. In V.I. Morosanova, Yu.P. Zinchenko (Eds.) Psychology of self-regulation: evolution of approaches and challenges of time : A collective monograph (pp. 134–151). Moscow : Psychological Institute of the Russian Academy of Education. (In Russ.).

Morosanova, V.I., Bondarenko, I.N., Potanina, A.M., Ishmuratova, Yu.A. (2021). Conscious self-regulation in the system of predictors of success in Russian language at school (general model and its modifications) Natsional’nyy psikhologicheskiy zhurnal (National Psychological Journal), 3(43), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.11621/npj.2021.0302 (In Russ.).

Morosanova, V.I., Potanina, A.M., Tsyganov, I.Yu. (2020). Personal characteristics and academic performance of students with different profiles of conscious self-regulation of educational activities. Pedagogika (Pedagogics), 84(9) 29–44. (In Russ.).

Morosanova, V.I., Filippova, E.V. (2019) What determines the reliability of students’ actions on the exam. Voprosy psikhologii (Questions in Psychology), 1, 65–78. (In Russ.).

Morosanova, V.I., Fomina, T.G., Tsyganov, I.Yu. (2017). Conscious self-regulation and attitude to learning in achieving educational goals. Moscow; St. Petersburg: Nestor-Istoriya. (In Russ.).

Potanina, A.M., Morosanova, V.I. (2021). Regulatory and personal resources of school success: individual typological aspects. Voprosy psihologii (Questions in Psychology), 67(5), 65–75. (In Russ.).

Potanina, A.M., Morosanova, V.I. (2022). Individual-typological features of relationship between conscious self-regulation, psychological well-being and academic achievement in 6-th grade students. Teoreticheskaya i eksperimental’naya psikhologiya (Theoretical and Experimental Psychology), 1(15), 52–78. https://doi.org/10.24412/2073-0861-2022-1-52-78 (In Russ.).

Potanina, A.M., Morosanova, V.I. (2023). Differential aspects of regulatory and personality resources of students with different profiles of school engagement. Teoreticheskaya i eksperimental’naya psikhologiya (Theoretical and Experimental Psychology), 4 (in print). (In Russ.).

Fomina, T.G., Morosanova, V.I. (2020). Russian adaptation and validation of the “Multidimensional School Engagement Scale”. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 14. Psikhologiya (Lomonosov Psychology Journal), 3, 194–213. https://doi.org/10.11621/ vsp.2020.03.09 (In Russ.).

Fomina, T.G., Potanina, A.M., Morosanova, V.I. (2022). Mediation effects of self-regulation in the relationship between school engagement and academic success of students of different ages. Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki (Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics), 19(4), 835–846. https://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8918-2022-4-835-846 (In Russ.).

Fomina, Т.G., Filippova, Е.V., Morosanova, V.I. (2021). Longitudinal study of the relationship between conscious self-regulation, school engagement and student academic achievement. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie (Psychological Science and Education), 26(5), 30–42. https://doi.org/10.17759/pse.2021260503 (In Russ.).

Bae, C.L., DeBusk-Lane, M. (2019). Middle school engagement profiles: Implications for motivation and achievement in science. Learning and Individual Differences, 74, 101753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2019.101753

Cleary, T.J., Slemp, J., Pawlo, E.R. (2021). Linking student self‐regulated learning profiles to achievement and engagement in mathematics. Psychology in the Schools, 58(3), 443–457. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22456

Dai, W., Li, Z., Jia, N. (2022). Self-regulated learning, online mathematics learning engagement, and perceived academic control among Chinese junior high school students during the COVID-19 pandemic: A latent profile analysis and mediation analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1042843

Estévez, I., Rodríguez-Llorente, C., Piñeiro, I., González-Suárez, R., Valle, A. (2021). School engagement, academic achievement, and self-regulated learning. Sustainability, 13(6), 3011. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063011.

Fomina, T.G., Burmistrova-Savenkova, A.V., Morosanova, V.I. (2020). Self-Regulation and Psychological Well-Being in Early Adolescence: A Two-Wave Longitudinal Study. Behavioral Sciences, 10(3), 67. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs10030067

Fredricks, J.A., Ye, F., Wang, M.-T., Brauer, S. (2019). Profiles of school disengagement: Not all disengaged students are alike. Handbook of student engagement interventions. In J.A. Fredricks, A.L. Reschly, S.L. Christenson (Eds.), (pp. 31–43). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813413-9.00003-6

Hessen, P.R., Kuncel, N.R. (2022). Beyond grades: A meta-analysis of personality predictors of academic behavior in middle school and high school. Personality and Individual Differences, 199, 111809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2022.111809

Howard, J.L., Bureau, J., Guay, F., Chong, J.X.Y., Ryan, R.M. (2021). Student Motivation and Associated Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis From Self-Determination Theory. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(6), 1300–1323. https://doi. org/10.1177/1745691620966789

Kriegbaum, K., Becker, N., Spinath, B. (2018). The relative importance of intelligence and motivation as predictors of school achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 25, 120–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.10.001

Lazowski, R.A., Hulleman, C.S. (2016). Motivation Interventions in Education: A Meta-Analytic Review. Review of Educational Research, 86(2), 602–640. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315617832

Lee, J., Stankov, L. (2018). Non-cognitive predictors of academic achievement: Evidence from TIMSS and PISA. Learning and Individual Differences, 65, 50–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.05.009.

Lei, H., Cui, Y., Zhou, W. (2018). Relationships between student engagement and academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 46(3), 517–528. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.7054

Mammadov, S. (2022). Big Five personality traits and academic performance: A meta‐analysis. Journal of Personality, 90(2), 222–255.

Morosanova, V.I., Bondarenko, I.N., Fomina, T.G., Burmistrova-Savenkova, A.V. (2018) Self-regulation, personality factors, academic motivation and math achievement in middle and senior school: variations across grade level. The European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences EpSBS, 43, 401–410.

Morosanova, V.I., Bondarenko, I.N., Fomina, T.G. (2022). Conscious Self-regulation, Motivational Factors, and Personality Traits as Predictors of Students’ Academic Performance: A Linear Empirical Model. Psychology in Russia, 15(4), 170. https://doi. org/10.11621/pir.2022.0411

Niemivirta, M., Pulkka, A.-T., Tapola, A., Tuominen, H. (2019). Achievement goal orientations: A person-oriented approach. The Cambridge handbook of motivation and learning. In K.A. Renninger, S.E. Hidi (Eds.), (pp. 566–616). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316823279.025

Pöysä, S., Poikkeus, A.M., Muotka, J., Vasalampi, K., Lerkkanen, M.K. (2020). Adolescents’ engagement profiles and their association with academic performance and situational engagement. Learning and Individual Differences, 82, 101922. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.lindif.2020.101922

Robson, D.A., Allen, M.S., Howard, S.J. (2020). Self-regulation in childhood as a predictor of future outcomes: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 146(4), 324. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000227

Schmidt, J.A., Rosenberg, J.M., Beymer, P.N. (2018). A person‐in‐context approach to student engagement in science: Examining learning activities and choice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(1), 19–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2020.101922

Stajkovic, A.D., Bandura, A., Locke, E.A., Lee, D., Sergent, K. (2018). Test of three conceptual models of influence of the big five personality traits and self-efficacy on academic performance: A meta-analytic path-analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 120, 238–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.08.014

van Rooij, E.C., Jansen, E.P., van de Grift W.J. (2017). Secondary school students’ engagement profiles and their relationship with academic adjustment and achievement in university. Learning and Individual Differences, 54, 9–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. lindif.2017.01.004

Wang, M.-T., Fredricks, J., Ye, F., Hofkens, T., Linn, J.S. (2019). Conceptualization and assessment of adolescents’ engagement and disengagement in school: A Multidimensional School Engagement Scale. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 35(4), 592–606. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000431

Yin, K., Lee, P., Sheldon, O. J., Li, C., Zhao, J. (2021). Personality profiles based on the FFM: A systematic review with a personcentered approach. Personality and Individual Differences, 180, 110996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110996

Zupančič, M., Kavčič, T., Slobodskaya, H.R., Akhmetova, O.A. (2016). Broad and narrow personality traits predicting academic achievement over compulsory schooling: A cross-sectional study in two countries. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 36(6), 783-806. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431615588954

To cite this article:

Potanina Anna M., Tsyganov Igor Yu., Morosanova Varvara I.. Typological Features of Academic Achievement Resources in Relation to Different School Engagement Profiles during Different Periods of Education. // National Psychological Journal 2023. 4. p.188-205. doi: 10.11621/npj.2023.0416

Copied to Clipboard

Copy