ISSN 2079-6617 (Print)
ISSN 2309-9828 (Online)
New approaches to formulation and solution of the problem of consciousness

New approaches to formulation and solution of the problem of consciousness

PDF (Rus)

Recieved: 09/01/2022

Accepted: 10/01/2022

Published: 03/16/2023

Keywords: consciousness; identification; typology; categories; categorical spaces; communicativeness of consciousness

p.: 66-76

DOI: 10.11621/npj.2023.0106

Available online: 16.03.2023

To cite this article:

Garnik V. Akopov. New approaches to formulation and solution of the problem of consciousness. // National Psychological Journal 2023. 1. p.66-76. doi: 10.11621/npj.2023.0106

Copied to Clipboard

Issue 1, 2023

Garnik V. Akopov Moscow City Pedagogical University


Background. In scientific and theoretical terms, the theme of consciousness as a subject of psychological research is regularly upd ated. Since psychology established its scientific status, at each historical transition from one economic structure to another, general scientific knowledge has been upd ated. At the same time, the central issue of consciousness is being permanently changed: from methodological issues (introspection) to structural-functional and objectified knowledge (analytical philosophy of consciousness, cognitive science, neuroscience). In this process, the so-called “hard problem of consciousness” comes to the fore today (D. Chalmers, А. Revonsuo). 

Objective. The article seeks to outline the necessity for and explain new methodological approaches to the formulation of and conceptual solution to the problem of consciousness (G. Akopov), moving from the contexts of interdisciplinary discourse to psychological discourse. 

Methods. On the basis of previous author’s reviews and research (G. Akopov) on the problems of consciousness, a certain range of philosophical, neuroscientific and psychological definitions and theories of consciousness is presented. The collected material, but for all its limitations in comparison with the hard-to-observe se t of ideas, approaches and concepts that exist today in modern English-language literature on the problems of consciousness, allows us to identify a number of key points in an excessively multiple picture, more or less logically compatible. The typological approach we proposed in 2015 (an expanded version in 2021) allows us to streamline the entire se t of ideas about consciousness. In accordance with the typology on the identification criterion, the concept of categories and categorical spaces of consciousness in various dimensions is specified. 

Results. A new methodology in the formulation and solution of the problem of consciousness has been formalized: categorical and typological approaches. The possibility of constructing categorical systems of various dimensions based on the typological identification of consciousness is demonstrated. The communicative nature of consciousness, implicitly represented in certain definitions of consciousness, is shown on the material of a number of existing approaches to identifying consciousness. 

Conclusion. Typological and categorical approaches make it possible to streamline and systematize the existing set of statements and solutions to the problem of consciousness. The relevant system of categorical spaces of various dimensions defines new opportunities for promising research, amplified by the thesis about the existence of non-verbal languages of consciousness in the socio-communicative, interpersonal and intrapersonal communicative dimensions. The new methodology, coupled with instrumental developments, makes it possible to pose and solve the topical problem of diversity and unity in human consciousness.


Agafonov, A.Yu. (2003). Fundamentals of the semantic theory of consciousness. SPb.: Rech’. (In Russ.). 

Akopov, G.V. (2019). Category of consciousness in modern psychology. Samara: Porto-print. (In Russ.). 

Akopov, G.V. (2015). Typological approach to analysis of various consciousness research programs. 19th Annual Meeting of the Association for the Scientific Study of Consciousness, Paris, July 7–10th, 2015 (p. 52). Paris. 

Akopov, G.V. (2016). Typology of problems in the new knowledge of consciousness. Mir psikhologii (World of psychology), 2, 178–191. (In Russ.). 

Akopov, G.V., Akopyan, L.S., Belous, A.V., Kaptsov, A.V. (2022). Non-verbal languages of consciousness: representation of the subjective attitude through color, form and direct evaluation. Eksperimental’naya psikhologiya (Experimental Psychology), 15 (2), 111–124. (In Russ.). 

Alexandrov, Yu.I. (2008). Emotion and morality. Metodologiya i istoriya psikhologii (Methodology and History of Psychology), 3 (3), 186–208. (In Russ.). 

Allahverdov, V.M. (2000). Consciousness as a paradox. SPb.: Izdatel’stvo DNK. (In Russ.). 

Alter, T. (2009). Phenomenal concepts. In T. Bayne et al. (Eds.), The Oxford companion to Consciousness (pp. 516–518). N.Y.: Oxford Univesity Press. 

Baars, B.J. (1988). A cognitive theory of consciousness. N.Y.: Cambridge Univesity Press. 

Block, N. (1995). On a confusion about a function of consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 18 (2), 227–247. 

Chalmers, D. (2013). The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory. M.: URSS; LIBROKOM. (In Russ.). 

Chalmers, D.J. (2018). The meta-problem of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 25 (9–10), 6–61. 

Damasio, A. (2018). This is how “I” begins. The brain and the emergence of consciousness. M.: Kar’era-Press. (In Russ.). 

Dubrovsky, D.I. (2007). Consciousness, brain, artificial intelligence. M.: Strategiya-Tsentr. (In Russ.). 

Gennaro, R.J. (2012). The consciousness Paradox. A Bradford Book. Cambridge: MIT Press. 

Graziano, M.S. (2015). Consciousness and the social brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 

Gulick, K.V. (2004). Higher-Order global states: An Alternativ Higher-order model of consciousness. In R.J. Gennaro (Eds.), Higher-Order Theories of Consciousness: An Anthology. Jonn Benjamins. 

Hameroff, S.R. (2014). Quantum effects in the understanding of consciousness. Journal of Integrative Neuroscience, 13 (2), 229–252. 

Honderich, T. (2014). Actual Consciousness. N.Y.: Oxford University Press. 

Kammerer, F. (2019) Debates on the meta-problem of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 26 (9–10), 8–18. 

Karpov, A.V. (2011). Psychology of consciousness: a metasystem approach. M.: RAO. (In Russ.). 

Khokhlov, N.A., Fedorova, E.D. (2021). Neuropsychology of the unconscious: the current state of the problem. Natsional’nyy psikhologicheskij zhurnal (National psychological journal), 1 (14), 127–148. (In Russ.). 

Koul, M. (1997). Cultural and historical psychology: the science of the future. M.: Kogito-Tsentr; Izd-vo Instituta psikhologii RAN. (In Russ.). 

Krichevets, A.N. (2009). About categories, existentials and psychological understanding. Metodologiya i istoriya psikhologii (Methodology and History of Psychology), 4 (3), 24–39. (In Russ.). 

Kriegel, U. (2009). Intentionality. In T. Bayne et al. (Eds.), The Oxford companion to Consciousness (pp. 382–285). N.Y.: Oxford University Press. 

Levin, J. (1983). Materialism and Qualia: The Explanatory Gap. Pacific Philosophical Quartely, 64 (4), 354–361. 

Mindt, G. (2019) Reflections on integrated information theory. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 26 (1–2), 7–8. 

Morin, A. (2009). Inner speech. In T. Bayne et al. (Eds.), The Oxford companion to Consciousness (pp. 380–382). N.Y.: Oxford University Press. 

Myasishchev, V.N. (1966). Consciousness as a unity of reflection of reality and human attitude to it. Problems of Consciousness: Proceedings of the Symposium (pp. 126–132). Moscow. (In Russ.). 

Nagel, T. (1974). What is it like to Be a Bat? The Philosophical Review, 83 (4), 435–450. 

O’Regan, J.K., Noё, A. (2001). A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 939–1031. 

Panov, V.I. (2014). Paradigm analysis of the problem of consciousness. Ecopsychology: Paradigm search (pp. 152–178). M., St. Petersburg: Psikhologicheskyy Institut RAO; Nestor-Istoriya. (In Russ.). 

Petrenko, V.F. (2010). Multidimensional consciousness: psychosemantic paradigm. Moscow: Noviy Khronograf. (In Russ.). 

Petrenko, V.F., Suprun, A.P. (2017). Methodological intersections of psychosemantics of consciousness and quantum physics (2nd ed.). M.; SPb.: Nestor-Istoriya. (In Russ.). 

Putnam, H. (1988). Representation and reality. Cambridge: MIT Press. 

Raikov, V.L. (2002). Unified Theory of Consciousness. Psikhologiya i ee prilozheniya: ezhegodnik RPO (Psychology and its Applications: RPS Yearbook), 9, 67–89. (In Russ.). 

Revonsuo, A. (2013). Psychology of consciousness. SPb.: Piter. (In Russ.). 

Rosenthal, D.M. (2005). Consciousness and mind. New York: Oxford University Press. 

Saiko, E.V. (2006). Consciousness in the definition of a person. Mir psikhologii (World of Psychology), 2, 3–11. (In Russ.). 

Searle, J.R. (1997). The mystery consciousness. N.Y.: New York Review Books. 

Shpet, G.G. (1994). Consciousness and its owner. Philosophical studies. M.: Izdatel’skaya gruppa “Progress”. (In Russ.). 

Subbotsky, E.V. (2007). Consciousness under construction. M.: Smysl. (In Russ.). 

Tononi, G. (2009). An integrated information theory of consciousness. In W.B. Banks (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Consciousness (pp. 403–416). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. 

Toropova, A.V. (2013). The intonation nature of consciousness. M.: Ritm. (In Russ.). 

Velmans, M. (2009). Understanding consciousness (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. 

Vygotsky, L.S. (1982). The problem of consciousness. Collected Works (1st ed.). M.: Pedagogika. (In Russ.). 

White, S.L. (2009). Qualia. In T. Bayne et al. (Eds.), The Oxford companion to Consciousness (pp. 545–549). N.Y.: Oxford University Press. 

Yurevich, A.V. (2018). The structure of psychological theories. In A.L. Zhuravlev, A.V. Yurevich (Eds.), Psychological knowledge: Current state and development prospects (pp. 141–159). M.: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”. (In Russ.). 

Zinchenko, Yu.P. (2011). Methodological problems of fundamental and applied psychological research. Natsional’nyy psikhologocheskiy zhurnal (National psychological journal), 1, 42–49. (In Russ.). 

Zinchenko, V.P. (2010). Consciousness and creative act. M.: Yazyki slavyanskih kul’tur. (In Russ.). 

Whitechead, C. (2008). The origin of consciousness in the social world. In Ch. Whitechead (Eds.). Exeter: Imprint Academic. 

Zeki, S. (2003). The disunity of consciousness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 214–218.

To cite this article:

Garnik V. Akopov. New approaches to formulation and solution of the problem of consciousness. // National Psychological Journal 2023. 1. p.66-76. doi: 10.11621/npj.2023.0106

Copied to Clipboard