ISSN 2079-6617
eISSN 2309-9828
Attitudes to gender inequality in partners and emotional states of women in close relationships

Attitudes to gender inequality in partners and emotional states of women in close relationships

PDF (Rus)

Recieved: 07/27/2022

Accepted: 10/31/2022

Published: 03/16/2023

Keywords: close relationships; gender attitudes; hostile sexism; benevolent sexism; women’s emotional states; loneliness; relationship satisfaction

p.: 55-65

DOI: 10.11621/npj.2023.0105

Available online: 16.03.2023

To cite this article:

Tatyana Р. Opekina, Natalia S. Shipova , Tatyana L. Kryukova. Attitudes to gender inequality in partners and emotional states of women in close relationships. // National Psychological Journal 2023. 1. p.55-65. doi: 10.11621/npj.2023.0105

Copied to Clipboard

Copy
Issue 1, 2023

Tatyana Р. Opekina Kostroma State University

Natalia S. Shipova Kostroma State University

Tatyana L. Kryukova Kostroma State University

Abstract

Background. Negative attitudes towards members of the opposite sex, traditionally defined as sexism, include such a cognitive aspect as attitudes to gender inequality. Close relationships between men and women represent an understudied though significant context for the actualization of both hostile and benevolent gender stereotypes, as well as for the emotional states they cause. 

Objective. The study focuses on the relationship between gender inequality attitudes of men and women in close relationships and the emotional states of women as the main objects of traditional gender stereotypes. 

Sample. The sample consisted of 45 couples (n = 90): 45 men 20–38 years old (M = 28; SD = 4.9) and 45 women 20–38 years old (M = 26; SD = 5.16) who are in close relationships from 1 year to 15 years. 

Methods. An empirical study was carried out with the following methods and techniques: questionnaire “Scale of ambivalent sexism towards women” (adapted by E.R. Agadullina); questionnaire “Hostile and friendly attitudes towards men” (adapted by V.S. Krivoshchekov and others), short version; questionnaire “Scale for assessing relationships” (adapted by O.A. Sychev), the author’s questionnaire of emotional states, interviews on the qualitative characteristics of close relationships. 

Results. The gender attitudes of women themselves and their male partners are related in different ways to the emotional states of women. The emergence in women of contempt, guilt, fear, disgust in relationships is associated with the presence of hostile attitudes in men. At the same time, women’s hostile sexism towards their gender is associated with their experience of loneliness in relationships, while benevolent sexism, on the contrary, turned out to be associated with positive emotions. Hostile paternalism attitudes in both women and their partners are associated with higher sexual satisfaction of women in dyads. 

Conclusion. The emotional states of women in close relationships are related to the gender attitudes of both partners. The results obtained make it possible to clarify the ambivalent specifics of the relationship between the cognitive component of sexism in the couple and emotional states of women.


References

Agadullina, E.R. (2018). Sexism towards women: adaptation of the scale of ambivalent sexism (P. Glick and S. Fisk) into Russian. Psikhologiia. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki (Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics), 15 (3), 447–463. 

(In Russ.). Amundsen, K. (1977). A New Look at the Silenced Majority: Women and American Democracy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. 

Brescoll, V.L. (2016). Leading with their hearts? How gender stereotypes of emotion lead to biased evaluations of female leaders. The Leadership Quarterly, 27, 415–428. 

Caughlin, J.P., Scott, A.M., Miller, L.E. (2009). Conflict and hurt in close relationships. In A.L. Vangelisti (Eds.), Feeling hurt in close relationships (pp. 143–166). New York: Cambridge University Press. 

Chiker, V.A., Artem’eva, L.I. (2008). Gender stereotypes in the family (on the example of civil marriages). Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Sotsiologiia (Bulletin of St. Petersburg University. Sociology), 3, 85–89. (In Russ.). 

Fischer, J. (1976). Are social workers sexists? Social work, 21, 428–433. 

Gaunt, R. (2013). Breadwinning moms, caregiving dads: Double standard in social judgments of gender norm violators. Journal of Family Issues, 34 (1), 3–24. 

Glick, P., Fiske, S.T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70 (3), 491–512. 

Glick, P., Fiske, S.T. (2001). Ambivalent sexism. In M.P. Zanna (Eds.)., Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 33 (pp. 115–188). San-Diego, CA: Academic Press. 

Glick, P., Fiske, S.T., Masser, B., Manganelli, A.M., Huang, L., Castro, Y.R., Wells, R. (2004). Bad but bold: Ambivalent attitudes toward men predict gender inequality in 16 nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 713–728. 

Graham, J.M. (2011). Measuring love in romantic relationships: A meta-analysis. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 28 (6), 748–771. 

Hoffman, P. (1984). Psychological abuse of women by spouses and live-in lovers. Women and Therapy, 3, 37–49. 

Khotkina, Z.A. (2016). Positive changes in the life of Russian women in the 21st century. Russian Women, 21st Century. Gender Studies. Collection of Materials (pp. 21–28). M.: Izd-vo “Ekon-Inform”. (In Russ.). 

Kletsina, I.S., Ioffe, E.V. (2019). Norms of female beh * avior: traditional and modern models. Zhenshchina v rossiiskom obshchestve (Woman in Russian Society), 3, 72–90. (In Russ.). 

Krivoshchekov, V.S., Gulevich, O.A., Liubkina, A.S. (2018). Hostile and benevolent attitudes towards men: adaptation of the scale of ambivalence towards men into Russian. Psikhologiia. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki (Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics), 15 (3), 427–446. (In Russ.). 

Kryukova, T.L., Ekimchik, O.A., Opekina, T.P. (2019). Psychology of coping with difficulties in close (interpersonal) relationships. Kostroma: Izd-vo KGU. (In Russ.). 

Kryukova, T.L., Opekina, T.P., Silina, E.A. (2020). Gender Inequality: How Sexism Is Linked to Aggression in Young Men and Women. In I.A. Furmanov (Eds.), Psychosocial adaptation in a transforming society: subject-subject communication as a factor in the socialization of an individual: materials of the V International Scientific Conference, Minsk, October 23–24, 2020 (pp. 123– 127). Minsk: BGU. (In Russ.). 

Russell, B.L., Trigg, K.Y. (2004). Tolerance of sexual harassment: An examination of gender differences, ambivalent sexism, social dominance, and gender roles. Sex Roles, 50 (7–8), 565–573. 

Silina, E.A., Kryukova, T.L. (2021). Family under the stress of self-isolation: the relationship between gender attitudes and coping strategies. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seriia “Psikhologiia” (Bulletin of Omsk University. Series “Psychology”), 1, 18–24. (In Russ.). 

Sychev, O.A. (2016). The Russian version of the relationship assessment scale. Psikhologiia. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki (Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics), 13 (2), 386–409. doi: 10.17323/1813–8918–2016–2–386–409 (In Russ.). 

Tashcheva, A.I., Kireeva, L.E. (2011). Role behavior of spouses in a “two-career” marriage. Rossiiskii psikhologicheskii zhurnal (Russian Psychological Journal), 8 (4), 44–55. (In Russ.). 

Viki, T.G., Abrams D., Hutchison, P. (2003). The “true” romantic: Benevolent sexism and paternalistic chivalry. Sex Roles, 49 (9–10), 533–537. 

Zdravomyslova, O.M. (2003). Family and Society: The Gender Dimension of Russian Transformation. M.: Editorial URSS. (In Russ.).


To cite this article:

Tatyana Р. Opekina, Natalia S. Shipova , Tatyana L. Kryukova. Attitudes to gender inequality in partners and emotional states of women in close relationships. // National Psychological Journal 2023. 1. p.55-65. doi: 10.11621/npj.2023.0105

Copied to Clipboard

Copy