ISSN 2079-6617
eISSN 2309-9828
Labor interests as a key factor in the involvement and performance of educational technology employees

Labor interests as a key factor in the involvement and performance of educational technology employees

PDF (Rus)

Recieved: 08/30/2022

Accepted: 09/29/2022

Published: 12/30/2022

Keywords: motivation; labor interests; organizational and job involvement; performance; educational technologies

p.: 102–115

DOI: 10.11621/npj.2022.0410

Available online: 30.12.2022

To cite this article:

Lobanova, Tatiana N.. Labor interests as a key factor in the involvement and performance of educational technology employees. // National Psychological Journal 2022. 4. p.102–115. doi: 10.11621/npj.2022.0410

Copied to Clipboard

Copy
Issue 4, 2022

Lobanova, Tatiana N. Lomonosov Moscow State University

Abstract

Background. Work activity in a post-industrial digital society differs fundamentally from our past ideas about work. The characteristics of this activity are changing just as rapidly, the motivation in employees of the information technology sphere, in particular. In this regard, the study of the role of labor interests, their relationship with the involvement and efficiency of workers in this area remains an urgent problem. 

Objective. The research analyses the relationship between labor interests as a value-motivational, emotionally colored position of an employee, expressed in a practical attitude to work, and the organizational and job involvement and employee’s performance. 

Methods. To measure the level of employees’ involvement and their interest, an author’s questionnaire of 54 questions was compiled, including the scales of work and organizational involvement and the measurement of labor interests. Also, evaluation sheets to measure performance were developed in collaboration with the heads of the company in question. Three groups of criteria were covered: qualitative, quantitative and temporal. 

Sample. The study involved personnel of an international company operating in the field of educational technologies in Russian and European markets. The survey involved respondents of various job levels from top management to specialists (N = 155, 48% women, 52% men), aged 18 to 36 years with work experience from 0.5 to 3 years. 60% of respondents have higher education, 40% of participants combine work and studies, reporting incomplete higher education. 

Results. The study results were verified with the Spearman correlation analysis. Factors of organizational and work involvement, types of labor interests, as well as performance were subjected to verification. Significant correlations were found on almost all scales, which confirmed the hypothesis that posited involvement of employees as being directly dependent on their interests. Career interests were significantly associated with the qualitative criterion of performance at the level of p < 0.01. Referential interests also had a correlation with employees’ performance. It turned out that top managers of the company have the highest performance and involvement rates. 

Conclusion. From the obtained correlation of professional interests and work involvement, it follows that a person is more actively immersed in work when the professional interests are taken into account. The connection between corporate interests and organizational involvement was also confirmed. It was found that organizational and job involvement are associated with such spheres of employees’ interest as group, career, professional, corporate and referential.


References

Ahmed, S., Taskin, N., Pauleen, D., Parker, J. (2017). Motivating Information Technology Professionals: The case of New Zealand. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 21. https://doi.org/10.3127/ajis.v21i0.14 

Andreeva, A.D., Lisichkina, A.G., Brimova, L.A. (2021). Temporal and life perspective as a motivational center of self-determination in early youth: a comparative historical study. Teoreticheskaya i eksperimental’naya psihologiya (Theoretical and experimental psychology), 14 (1), 6–15. (In Russ.). 

AON Hewitt. (2013). Best employers. (Retrieved from https://ceplb03.hewitt.com/bestemployers/canada/pages/emp_engagement.htm) (review date: 21.06.2022). 

Koniukhov, N.I. (1992). Applied aspects of modern psychology: terms, laws, concepts, methods. Reference edition. Moscow. (In Russ.). 

Creativity: theory, diagnostics, technologies. (2014). In T.A. Barysheva (Eds.), Dictionary reference. St. Petersburg: Izdatel’stvo VVM. (In Russ.). 

Handbook of Industrial, Work and Organizational Psychology. (2020). In N. Anderson, D.S. Ones, H.K. Sinangil, C. Viswesvaran (Eds.). London; Thousand Oaks; New Delhi: Sage Publications. 

Karpov, A.V., Karpov, A.A. (2021). Methodological aspects of the psychological analysis of the activity of the subject-information class. In: Psychology of personnel management and the ecosystem of mentoring in the context of changing technological order (pp. 28–35). N. Novgorod: NNGU im. N.I. Lobachevskogo. (In Russ.). 

Klimov, E.A. (1995). The image of the world in different types of professions. M.: MGU. (In Russ.). 

Krushinskaya, Y.U. (2018). Communities and community management as a multifaceted tool for achieving goals. (Retrieved from https://communityhub.ru/juliya-krushinskaya) (review date: 04.06.2022). (In Russ.). 

Leonova, A.B., Kuznecova, A.S. (2019). Structural-integrative approach to the analysis of functional states: the history of creation and prospects. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 14. Psihologiya (Moscow University Psychology Bulletin), 1, 13–31. (In Russ.). 

Levenchuk, A. (2015). Decline of professions. (Retrieved from http://erazvitie.org/article/zakat_professij) (review date: 20.06.2022). (In Russ.). 

Lobanova, T. (2020). The Study of Labor Interests of Young Workers in the Selection and Adaptation of Personnel. Behavioral Sciences, 10 (1), 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs10010022 

Lobanova, T.N. (2015). The influence of dominant labor interests on the activities of employees of the organization. Organizacionnaya psihologiya (Organizational psychology), 2, 26–45. (In Russ.). 

Lobanova, T.N. (2021). Methodology for studying the labor interests of workers in modern organizations. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 14. Psihologiya (Moscow University Psychology Bulletin), 2, 314–340. (In Russ.). 

MacLeod, D., Clarke, N. (2011). Engaging for success: enhancing performance through employee engagement. A report to Government. (Retrieved from https://dera.ioe.ac.uk/1810/1/file52215.pdf) (review date: 12.06.2022). 

Onuchin, A. (2013). Engagement study. HRTimes. (Retrievd from https://www.ecopsy.ru/insights/izuchenie-vovlecheniya/) (review date: 05.06.2022). (In Russ.). 

Oxford Dictionary of Psychology. (2002). In A. Ribs (Eds.). M.: Veche; AST. (In Russ.). 

Petrova, S.I. (2018). On the categories of “need”, “interest”, “motive”. Nauka bez granic (Science without borders), 7 (24), 90–94. (In Russ.). 

Saks, A.M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of managerial psychology, 21 (7), 600–619. 

Schaufeli, W.B., Bakker, A.B. (2004). Utrecht Work Engagement Scale: Preliminary Manual. (Retrieved from https://www.wilmar-schaufeli.nl/publications/Schaufeli/Test%20Manuals/Test_manual_UWES_English.pdf) (review date: 03.02.2022). 

Schaufeli, W.B., Salanova, M., Gonzalez-Roma, V., Bakker, A.B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness studies, 3 (1), 71–92. 

Shvab, K. (2018). Fourth industrial revolution. M.: Eksmo. (In Russ.). 

Smirnov, P.S. (2019). Personnel involvement: types, levels of manifestation and links with human resource management practices. Organizacionnaya psihologiya (Organizational psychology), 1, 81–95. (In Russ.). 

Trends in Global Employee Engagement. (2017). (Retrieved from https://markapracodawcy.pl/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/2017-Trends-in-Global-Employee-Engagement.pdf) (review date: 20.06.2022). 

Volgusheva, A.A. (2018). Law and social interests (Retrieved from https://center-yf.ru/data/stat/socialnyy-interes.php) (review date: 18.06.2022). (In Russ.). 

Working Today: Understanding What Drives Employee Engagement. (2003). The 2003 Towers Perrin Talent Report US Report. (Retrieved from https://studylib.net/doc/12886509/understanding-what-drives-employee-engagement-working-tod) (review date: 20.06.2022).


To cite this article:

Lobanova, Tatiana N.. Labor interests as a key factor in the involvement and performance of educational technology employees. // National Psychological Journal 2022. 4. p.102–115. doi: 10.11621/npj.2022.0410

Copied to Clipboard

Copy