ISSN 2079-6617
eISSN 2309-9828
Funny and scary in children’s narratives: cognitive aspect

Funny and scary in children’s narratives: cognitive aspect

PDF (Rus)

Recieved: 05/16/2022

Accepted: 06/04/2022

Published: 08/24/2022

Keywords: funny; scary; overcoming fear; dialectical thinking; children’s narratives

p.: 44-51

DOI: 10.11621/npj.2022.0306

Available online: 24.08.2022

To cite this article:

Shiyan, Olga A. . Funny and scary in children’s narratives: cognitive aspect . // National Psychological Journal 2022. 3. p.44-51. doi: 10.11621/npj.2022.0306

Copied to Clipboard

Copy
Issue 3, 2022

Shiyan, Olga A. Russian State University For The Humanities

Abstract

Background. The study of the funny and the scary in the children’s subculture, described in the article by E.O. Smirnova and A.L. Romanova, allows us to consider these phenomena as the reverse side and an integral part of mastering culture, to see the dialectics of development. 

Objective. The aim of the study is to analyse the cognitive mechanisms used to overcome fear on the basis of children’s narratives. 

Sample. The study involved 57 children aged 6 to 6.5 years from two kindergartens (Moscow). 

Methods. The empirical study was carried out with the author’s methodology “Non-scary story”: the children were asked to compose a story about a scary character, though the story itself ought to have been not scary. The study was conducted in preschool groups,contrasted by the parameter of education quality. The quality of education was assessed with the ECERS-3 (educational environment assessment scales) and the scales for assessing the conditions for the development of creative abilities, developed and tested in the Laboratory of Child Development at Moscow City University. 

Results. Among the ways to overcome the scary in children’s stories, two major ways can be noted. The first one is turning a scary character into a non-scary one, and the second one is creating ambivalent characters that combine opposites of the scary and the funny. In both cases, dialectical thinking is the cognitive mechanism which makes it possible for a child to operate with opposites and to reflect situations of contradiction and development. In the stories of children from the group with higher quality of education, ambivalent characters were found twice as often as in the other group (according to Student’s t-test, the differences are significant at the level of 0.05), which may indicate a connection between the quality of educational process and child development. 

Conclusion. Solving the problem of overcoming fear when writing a narrative, children can use dialectical thinking — in particular, the actions of transformation and mediation (in ambivalent images combining opposites in themselves). It can be assumed that such symbolic activity as story creation acts as scaffolding1 for implementation and development of dialectical structures in preschool age.


References

Artem’eva, T.V. (2021). Humor of children: the content of the construct and methods for its evaluation. Sovremennoe doshkol’noe obrazovanie (Modern preschool education), 3 (105), 46–59. doi: 10.24412/1997-9657-2021-3105-46-59 (In Russ.). 

Averintsev, S.S. (1992). Bakhtin, laughter, Christian culture. M.M. Bakhtin as a philosopher. Moscow: Nauka. (In Russ.). 

Bakhtin, М.М. (1990). The work of Francois Rabelais and the folk culture of the Middle Ages and the Renaissance. Мoscow: Khudozhestvennaya literatura. (In Russ.). 

Basseches, М. (2018). Dialectical thinking and adult development. Мoscow: Mozaika-Sintez, Moskovskii gorodskoi universitet. (In Russ.). 

Belolutskaya, A.K., Vorob’eva, I.I., Shiyan, O.A., Zadadaev, S.A., Shiyan, I.B. (2021). Conditions for the development of a child’s creative abilities: the results of approbation of the tool for assessing the quality of education in kindergarten. Sovremennoe doshkol’noe obrazovanie (Modern preschool education), 2 (104), 12–30. doi: 10.24411/1997-9657-2021-10096 (In Russ.). 

Loizou, Е. (2005). Infant humor: the theory of the absurd and the empowerment theory. International Journal of Early Years Education, 13 (1), 43–53. doi: 10.1080/09669760500048329 

Lucas, C.G., Bridgers, S., Griffiths, T.L., & Gopnik, A. (2014). When children are better (or at least more open-minded) learners than adults: Developmental differences in learning the forms of causal relationships. Cognition, 131, 284–299. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.12.010 

Novlyanskaya, Z.N. (2010). Teaching and creativity. Мoscow; Obninsk: IG-SOTsIN. (In Russ.). 

Novlyanskaya, Z.N. (2019). About the verbal creativity of preschoolers. Iskusstvo v shkole (Art in school), 1, 14–19. (In Russ.). 

Osorina, M.V. (2018). The secret world of children in the space of the world of adults. SPb.: Piter. (In Russ.). 

Podd’yakov, N.N. (2009). Children’s experimentation and the heuristic structure of the preschool child’s experience. Issledovatel (Researcher), 2, 68–75. (In Russ.). 

Romanova, A.L., Smirnova, E.O. (2013). Funny and scary in modern children’s subculture. Kul’turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya (Cultural-historical psychology), 2, 81–87. (In Russ.). 

Shcherbakova, O.V., Osorina, M.V. (2009). The humorous component as a factor in increasing the complexity of intellectual tasks (on the example of D. Veksler’s test). Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta (Bulletin of St. Petersburg University), 12 (1), 108–115. (In Russ.). 

Singer, E., de Khaan, D. (2019). Play, wonder, learn. Theory of development, education and training of children. Мoscow: Mozaika-Sintez. (In Russ.). 

Sylva, K., Bruner, J., Jolly, A. (2017). Play: its role in development and evolution. International Psychotherapy Institute. (Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328486788)

Tsukerman, G.A. (2016). Game and learning: a meeting of two leading activities. Kul’turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya (Cultural-historical psychology), 2, 4–13. doi: 10.17759/chp.2016120201 (In Russ.). 

Veraksa, N.Е. (2021). Dialectical thinking of a preschooler. Opportunities and cultural contexts. Мoscow: Izdatel’stvo Moskovskogo universiteta. (In Russ.). 

Veraksa, N.Е., D’yachenko, О.М. (1996). Ways to regulate behavior in preschool children. Voprosy psikhologii (Questions of psychology), 3, 14–27. (In Russ.). 

Veraksa, А.N. (2012). Possibilities of play space in the cognitive activity of a preschool child. Sovremennoe doshkol’noe obrazovanie (Modern preschool education), 1, 61–65. (In Russ.). 

Vygotskii, L.S. (1966). Play and its role in the mental development of the child. Voprosy psikhologii (Questions of psychology), 6, 62–68. (In Russ.). 

Wood, D., Bruner, J., Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89–100. 

Zaretskii, V.K. (2016). One step in learning — one hundred steps in development: from idea to practice. Kul’turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya (Cultural-historical psychology), 3, 149–188. doi: 10.17759/chp.2016120309 (In Russ.).


To cite this article:

Shiyan, Olga A. . Funny and scary in children’s narratives: cognitive aspect . // National Psychological Journal 2022. 3. p.44-51. doi: 10.11621/npj.2022.0306

Copied to Clipboard

Copy