ISSN 2079-6617 (Print)
ISSN 2309-9828 (Online)
Inclusive and exclusive identities and contacts: the role of values and status of ethnic group

Inclusive and exclusive identities and contacts: the role of values and status of ethnic group

PDF (Rus)

Recieved: 03/01/2021

Accepted: 05/25/2021

Published: 07/30/2020

Keywords: values; exclusive identity; inclusive identity; ethnic identity; civic identity; regional identity; contacts; Russians; status of ethnic group; ethnic minority; ethnic majority

p.: 61-75

DOI: 10.11621/npj.2021.0206

Available online: 30.07.2021

To cite this article:

Zarina Kh. Lepshokova. Inclusive and exclusive identities and contacts: the role of values and status of ethnic group. // National Psychological Journal 2021. 2. p.61-75. doi: 10.11621/npj.2021.0206

Copied to Clipboard

Issue 2, 2021

Zarina Kh. Lepshokova HSE University


Background. Identity and contacts are often studied from the perspective of inherent conflict potential for intergroup relations leading to prejudice and exclusion in societies which contain groups with different ethnic status. Nonetheless, there are certain identification and interaction mechanisms that can potentially mitigate or cancel these harmful effects. These comprise inclusive contacts and identities, in particular the positive inclusive identities, which allow to unite the representatives of different groups. It is important to find out what determines these identities and contacts. Schwartz’s theory of individual values has great potential for explaining the personality determinants of identities positivity and the intensity of contacts.

Objective. The aim of the study was to examine the role of individual values and status of ethnic group in assessing the positivity of exclusive and inclusive identities, as well as in the intensity of exclusive and inclusive contacts among members of ethnic majority and minority groups.

Design. The study was conducted on a sample of an ethnic minority (Russians living in the North Caucasus) and on a sample of an ethnic majority (Russians living in Moscow). The total sample size is = 499 respondents. The individual values were measured using a portrait value questionnaire – PVQ-R (Schwartz et al., 2012); positivity of ethnic identity, positivity of civic identity, positivity of regional identity, intercultural contacts, monocultural contacts were measured using the appropriate methods from the questionnaire of the MIRIPS project (Mutual intercultural relations in plural societies) (Berry, 2017).

Results. The study found that (1) the values of Conservation underlie the positivity of exclusive ethnic and inclusive civic identities among members of the ethnic majority, (2) values of Openness to Change underlie exclusive monocultural contacts among ethnic minority and majority members, (3) values of Self-Enhancement underlie inclusive intercultural contacts among members of the ethnic minority.

Conclusion. The results of this study revealed the motivational foundations of exclusive monocultural and inclusive intercultural friendship, which were based on the values of personal focus among the Russian ethnic minority and majority members. At the same time, the values of social focus turned out to underlie the positivity of the exclusive ethnic Russian and inclusive civic Russian identity among the ethnic Russian majority members. The research results have a wide potential for further theoretical and practical application in the field of intercultural relations and their harmonization.


Abbink K., Harris D. (2019). In-group favouritism and out-group discrimination in naturally occurring groups. PLoS ONE, 14 (9), [e0221616]. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221616

Akkieva S.I. (2013). The Russians living in the Kabardian-Balkar Republic: migration attitudes and ethno-cultural needs. “Belye pyatna” v rossiiskoi i mirovoi istorii (“White Spots” of the Russian and World History), 3 (5–6), 9–20. (In Russ.)

Allport G. (1954). The Nature of Prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Balliet D., Wu J., De Dreu C.K.W. (2014). Ingroup favoritism in cooperation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140 (6), 1556–1581. doi:

Bardi A., Jaspal R., Polek E., Schwartz S.H. (2014). Values and Identity Process Theory: theoretical integration and empirical interactions. Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/cbo9781139136983.013

Berry J.W. (2017). Evaluation of the Hypotheses and Conclusions In J. W. Berry. In Mutual intercultural relations (pp. 353–374). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Brewer M.B. (1996). When contact is not enough: Social identity and intergroup cooperation. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 20, 291–303. doi: 10.1016/0147-1767(96)00020-X

Brewer M.B. (1999). The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love or outgroup hate? Journal of Social Issues, 55, 429–444. doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00126

Curtis K.A. (2014). Inclusive versus exclusive: A cross-national comparison of the effects of subnational, national, and supranational identity. European Union Politics, 15 (4), 521–546 doi: 10.1177/1465116514528058

Demographic and ethnical problems of the North Caucasus and ways of solving them [Electronic resource]. URL: (In Russ.).

Drobizheva L.M. (2002). Russian and ethnic identity: conflict or compatibility. Rossiya reformiruyushchayasya (Russia in the course of reforms), 2, 213–244. (In Russ.).

Duckitt J., Mphuthing T. (1998). Group identification and intergroup attitudes: A longitudinal analysis in South Africa, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 8–85. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.74.1.80

Gaertner S.L., Guerra R., Rebelo M., Dovidio J.F., Hehman E., Deegan M.P. (2016). The common ingroup identity model and the development of a functional perspective: A cross-national collaboration. In J. Vala, Waldzus, S., M. Calheiros (Eds.), The Social Developmental Construction of Violence and Intergroup Conflict (pp. 105–120). Springer International Publishing, Switzerland. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-42727-0_5

Golec de Zavala A., Lantos D. (2020). Collective narcissism and its social consequences: The bad and the ugly. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 29 (3), 273–278. doi: 10.1177/0963721420917703

Grigor’ev D.S., Batkhina A.A., Dubrov D.I. (2018). Assimilationism, multiculturalism, ethnical color blindness and policulturalism in the Russian context. Kul’turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya (Cultural-historical psychology), 14 (2), 53–65. doi: 10.17759/chp.2018140206 (In Russ.).

Grigoryan L., Schwartz S.H. Values and attitudes towards cultural diversity: Exploring alternative moderators of the value- attitude link. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. [Electronic resource]. URL: (date of retrieval:16.02.2021). doi: 10.1177/1368430220929077

Grigoryev D., van de Vijver F. (2018). Acculturation expectation profiles of Russian majority group members and their intergroup attitudes. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 64 (3), 90–99. doi: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2018.03.001

Hayes A.F. (2018). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Huddy L. (2001). From social to political identity: A critical examination of social identity theory. Political Psychology, 22, 127–156. doi: 10.1111/0162-895X.00230

Lakens D. (2017). Equivalence tests: A practical primer for t tests, correlations, and meta-analyses. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8, 355–362. doi: 10.1177/1948550617697177

Lebedeva N., Tatarko A., Berry J.W. (2016). Are intercultural contacts dangerous or profitable for person and society? Intercultural relations in Russia and Latvia. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 9 (1), 41–56. doi: 10.11621/pir.2016.0103

Lebedeva N.M. (1997). Sotsial’no-psikhologicheskaya akkul’turatsiya etnicheskikh grupp: diss. ... doct. psikhol. nauk. (Social-psychological acculturation of ethnic groups). Doctoral dissertation (Psychology). Moscow. (In Russ.).

Lebedeva N.M. (2009). Mutual acculturation of people living in Moscow and migrants with a different cultural background: social-psychological analysis. (Eds.), In N.M. Lebedeva Strategies of intercultural contacts between migrants and Russian population (pp. 64–92). Moscow: RUDN. (In Russ.).

Lebedeva N.M., Lepshokova Z.Kh., Galyapina V.N. (2016). Cultural-psychological factors of intergenerational value transmission in the Russians living in the North Caucasus. Voprosy psikhologii (Issues of psychology), 5, 47–61. (In Russ.)

Lebedeva N.M., Tatarko A.N. (2009). Strategies of intercultural contacts between migrants and Russian population. Moscow: RUDN.

Lepshokova Z.Kh. (2012). Strategies of migrants’ adaptation and their psychological well-being (the example of Moscow and North Caucasus). Moscow: Grifon. doi: 10.1037/e503532013-001 (In Russ.).

Lepshokova Z.Kh. (2017a). The role of intercultural and monocultural friendship in the interaction between peoples of Dagestan. In N.M. Lebedeva (Eds.), Intercultural relations in post-Soviet regions (pp. 276–298). Moscow: Menedzher. (In Russ.).

Lepshokova Z.Kh. (2017b). Inter cultural relations between the Kabardians, the Balkars and the Russians living in the Kabardian-Balkar Republic. (Eds.), In N.M. Lebedeva. Intercultural relations in post-Soviet regions (pp. 156–186). Moscow: Menedzher. (In Russ.).

Lepshokova Z., Lebedeva N. (2018). The Role of Social Disidentification in Acculturation Preferences of Ethnic Majority and Minority Members in Kabardino-Balkar Republic, in: Changing Values and Identities in Post-Communist World. (Eds.). In N. Lebedeva, R. Dimitrova, J.W. Berry. (pp. 313–331). Switzerland : Springer,. Ch. 17,. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-72616-8_18

Magun V.S., Rudnev M.G., Shmidt P. (2015). European value typology and the Russians’ basic values. Vestnik obshchestvennogo mneniya. Dannye. Analiz. Diskussii (Bulletin of public opinion. Data. Analysis. Discussion),121 (3–4), 74–93. (In Russ.).

McPherson M., Smith-Lovin L., Cook J.M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444. doi: 10.2307/2678628

Meleady R., Forder L. (2019). When contact goes wrong: Negative intergroup contact promotes generalized outgroup avoidance. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 22 (5), 688–707. doi: 10.1177/1368430218761568

Pavlenko V.N., Taglin S.A. (2005). General and applied ethnopsychology: study guide. Moscow: KMK. (In Russ.).

Pettigrew T.F. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 65–85. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.65

Pettigrew T.F., Tropp L.R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751–783. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751

Roccas S., Schwartz S.H., Amit A. (2010). Personal Value Priorities and National Identification. Political Psychology, 31 (3), 393– 419. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00763.x

Sagiv L., Schwartz S.H. (1995). Value priorities and readiness for out-group social contact. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69 (3), 437–448. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.69.3.437

Schalk-Soekar S.R.G., van de Vijver F.J.R. (2008). The concept of multiculturalism: A study among Dutch majority members. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38, 2152–2178. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2008.00385.x

Schwartz S.H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries.

In M.P. Zanna (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology, 25 (pp. 1–65). Academic Press, New York, NY, doi: 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60281-6

Schwartz S.H. (2006). A theory of cultural value orientations: Explication and applications. Comparative Sociology, 5, 137–182. doi: 10.1163/156913306778667357

Schwartz S.H., Cieciuch J., Vecchione M., Davidov E., Fischer R., Beierlein C., Ramos A., Verkasalo M., Lönnqvist J.E., Demirutku K., Dirilen-Gumus O., Konty M. (2012). Refining the theory of basic individual values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 663–688. doi: 10.1037/a0029393

Shvarts Sh., Butenko T.P., Sedova, D.S. Lipatova A.S. (2012). Verified theory of basic individual values: application in Russia. Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki (Psychology. Journal of Higher School of Economics), 9 (2), 43–70. (In Russ.)

Simonsen K.B. (2017). Inclusive or Exclusive? How Contact with Host Nationals May Change Immigrants’ Boundary Perceptions and Foster Identity Compatibility. International Migration Review. URL: (accessed 16.02.2021). doi:

Tajfel H., Turner J.C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour. In S. Worchel, W.G. Austin. Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.

Tishkov V.A. (2019). Russian identity: internal and external challenges. Vestnik Rossiiskoi akademii nauk (Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Scinces),89 (4), 408–412. doi: 10.1134/S1019331619020229 (In Russ.).

Verkuyten M., Martinovic B. (2012). Social Identity Complexity and Immigrants’ Attitude Toward the Host Nation: The Intersection of Ethnic and Religious Group Identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38 (9), 1165–1177. doi: 10.1177/0146167212446164

To cite this article:

Zarina Kh. Lepshokova. Inclusive and exclusive identities and contacts: the role of values and status of ethnic group. // National Psychological Journal 2021. 2. p.61-75. doi: 10.11621/npj.2021.0206

Copied to Clipboard