Recieved: 05/15/2020
Accepted: 05/30/2020
Published: 10/06/2020
Keywords: preschool age; play; executive functions; inhibition; working memory; cognitive flexibility
Pages: 99-108
DOI: 10.11621/npj.2020.0209
Available online: 06.10.2020
Bukhalenkova, D.A. , Gavrilova, M.N., Airapetyan, Z. V., Tarasova K. S., Semenov Yuri I. (2020). Relation between play preferences at home and self-regulation in preschool children. National Psychological Journal, (2) , 99-108. https://doi.org/10.11621/npj.2020.0209
Copied to Clipboard
CopyBackground. Nowadays, the research of playing activity in the home environment is insufficient. Meanwhile, theoretical and empirical analysis has shown the importance of the play in the development of executive functions, and the results obtained in the study can be used as practical recommendations for preschool specialists and parents of senior preschool age children.
The Objective is to study the relationship between the components of executive functions and children preferences in the play and its duration at home.
Design. Children aged 5-6 years (N=163, 52% of males) and their mothers participated in the study. In the first stage, the development of the following components of executive functions in preschool children was assessed: inhibition, verbal and visual working memory and cognitive flexibility. Information on children's play preferences at home were obtained as a result of parents filling in a specialized questionnaire, which contained questions about the duration of play and its content.
Results. Analysis of play preferences revealed that the majority of preschool children in our sample have favorite toys (85%): males prefer games in constructing materials and transport, while females prefer puzzles and sets for creativity, as well as play with soft toys and dolls, and also pretending ‘family’ members games. It was found that girls successfully coped with tasks on cognitive flexibility, inhibition and verbal working memory than boys. The most preferable type of games for senior preschoolers are board games and active games, and also construction sets. Children who prefer constructing materials and transport were less successful at cognitive flexibility task than children who don't play construction games. Children who prefer soft toys and sets of figures perform a lower level of spatial working memory than children who prefer other kinds of games. Children who prefer to play board games have a higher level of inhibition. Children whose favorite character often changes were more successful in inhibition task than children who have one steady favourite character.
Conclusion. The study showed that board games, puzzles, and playing with different subjects and pretending various characters have the most developing potential for older preschoolers. No differences in game duration depending on the level of development of executive functions were found.
Table 1.Mean of executive functions indicators in preschool children
Parameters |
Sample |
Males |
Females |
|||
М |
SD |
М |
SD |
М |
SD |
|
DCCS. Sorting by color |
5.90 |
0.68 |
5.81 |
0.94 |
6.00 |
0.00 |
DCCS. Sorting by shape |
5.37 |
1.39 |
5.17 |
1.62 |
5.60 |
1.06 |
DCCS. Sorting with borders |
7.59 |
2.37 |
7.25 |
2.19 |
7.95 |
2.50 |
DCCS. Total score |
18.87 |
2.83 |
18.23 |
2.74 |
19.54 |
2.77 |
Naming. Uncorrected mistakes |
0.82 |
1.77 |
1.10 |
2.10 |
0.52 |
1.27 |
Naming. Corrected mistakes |
1.00 |
1.15 |
1.16 |
1.34 |
0.83 |
0.89 |
Naming. Time |
46.79 |
13.37 |
48.23 |
14.95 |
45.25 |
11.32 |
Inhibition. Uncorrected mistakes |
3.24 |
6.00 |
4.19 |
7.36 |
2.21 |
3.84 |
Inhibition. Corrected mistakes |
2.16 |
1.80 |
2.51 |
1.81 |
1.79 |
1.73 |
Inhibition. Time |
61.53 |
15.18 |
60.98 |
15.38 |
62.12 |
15.05 |
Visual working memory. Contents |
37.77 |
5.72 |
37.06 |
5.94 |
38.51 |
5.42 |
Visual working memory. Spatial |
18.75 |
4.49 |
18.96 |
4.27 |
18.52 |
4.72 |
Visual working memory. Bonus |
18.90 |
12.76 |
19.13 |
12.47 |
18.65 |
13.13 |
Visual working memory. Total score |
75.41 |
21.03 |
75.15 |
20.94 |
75.68 |
21.26 |
Verbal working memory. Total score |
18.90 |
4.80 |
18.19 |
5.08 |
19.65 |
4.39 |
Table 2. Distribution of mothers' answers to the question about toys preferred by their children
Answers |
Sample (n=161) |
Males(n=82) |
Females (n=79) |
Significance level |
Building set |
104 |
65 |
38 |
£0.001 |
Puzzles |
65 |
27 |
38 |
0.050 |
Dolls |
59 |
1 |
57 |
£0.001 |
Soft toys |
53 |
10 |
43 |
£0.001 |
Mosaics and creativity kits |
55 |
17 |
38 |
£0.001 |
Cars and other vehicles |
84 |
70 |
13 |
£0.001 |
Sets of figures (soldiers. zoo animals. etc.) |
52 |
24 |
52 |
0.609 |
Table 3. Distribution of mothers' answers to the question about games preferred by their children
Answers |
Sample (n=159) |
Males (n=82) |
Females (n=77) |
Significance level |
Board games |
82 |
44 |
38 |
0.587 |
Active & sport games |
78 |
45 |
33 |
0.130 |
Computer games, game consoles |
27 |
19 |
8 |
0.032 |
Designing using building kits and construction sets |
76 |
48 |
28 |
0.005 |
Pretend play using book, film, cartoon characters |
49 |
20 |
29 |
0.070 |
Playing various professionals |
48 |
20 |
28 |
0.100 |
Playing as ‘family’ members |
44 |
8 |
36 |
£0.001 |
Playing ‘war’ games |
10 |
10 |
0 |
£0.001 |
Table 4. Differences in performing "Inhibition" method by children who play and do not play board games
Board Games |
Do not play (n=77) |
Do play (n=80) |
Significance level |
||
М |
SD |
М |
SD |
||
Naming. Corrected mistakes |
1.22 |
1.24 |
0.82 |
1.03 |
0.028 |
Naming. Time |
49.21 |
15.23 |
44.53 |
11.06 |
0.052 |
Inhibition. Time |
66.23 |
18.25 |
57.83 |
11.75 |
0.004 |
Table 5. Differences in children performing "Inhibition" method depending on the answer to the question: “Does the child have a favorite character?”
The child has a favorite character (n=61) |
The child does not have a favorite character (n=21) |
Favorite characters often change (n=76) |
Significance level |
||||
M |
SD |
M |
SD |
M |
SD |
||
Naming. Uncorrected mistakes |
1.36 |
2.42 |
0.38 |
0.97 |
0.53 |
1.14 |
0.008 |
Inhibition. Corrected mistakes |
2.77 |
1.87 |
2.57 |
1.72 |
1.54 |
1.58 |
£0.001 |
Inhibition. Timing |
64.49 |
15.40 |
64.05 |
16.54 |
58.57 |
14.20 |
0.057 |
-
Allee-Herndon, K. A., Taylor, D.D. & Roberts, Sh.K. (2019). Putting play in its place: presenting a continuum to decrease mental health referrals and increase purposeful play in classrooms. International Journal of Play, 186-203. doi: 10.1080/21594937.2019.1643993
Chen, F. & Fleer, M. A (2016) cultural-historical reading of how play is used in families as a tool for supporting children’s emotional development in everyday life. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 24, 305–319.
Coelho, L. A., Amatto, A. N., Gonzalez, C. L. R. & Gibb, R. L. (2020). Building executive function in pre-school children through play: a curriculum. International Journal of Play, 15, 128-142.doi:10.1080/21594937.2020.1720127
Diamond, A., & Daphne, S.L. (2016). Conclusions about interventions, programs, and approaches for improving executive functions that appear justified and those that, despite much hype, do not. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience,18, 34-48
Elias, C.L., & Berk, L.E. (2002). Self-regulation in young children: Is there a role for sociodramatic play? Early childhood research quarterly,17, 216–238.doi: 10.1016/S0885-2006(02)00146-1
El'konin, D.B. Psikhologiya igry. — M.: Kniga po trebovaniyu, 2019. – 228 s.
Friedman, N. P. & Miyake, A. (2017).Unity and diversity of executive functions. Individual differences as a window on cognitive structure. Corte,186-204. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2016.04.023
Goldstein, T. R. & Lerner, M. D. (2017) Dramatic pretend play games uniquely improve emotional control in young children. Developmental Science, 21,1-19.
Howard, J., Miles, G.E., Rees-Davies, L., & Bertenshaw, E.J. (2017). Play in Middle Childhood: Everyday Play Behaviour and Associated Emotions. Children and Society, 31, 378–389. doi: 10.1111/chso.12208
Jaggy, A.-K., Mainhard, T., Sticca, F. & Perren, S. The emergence of dyadic pretend play quality during peer play: the role of child competence play partner competence and dyadic constellation.// Social Development. –2020.
Korkman, M., Kirk, U., & Kemp, S. L. (2007). NEPSY II. Administrative manual. San Antonio. TX: Psychological Corporation.
Koffka, K. (2017). Fundamentals of mental development. Moscow: Akademicheskiy proekt, 356.
Kravtsov, G.G., & Kravtsova, E.E. (2017). Psikhologiya igry: kul'turno-istoricheskii podkhod – M.: Lev", 344.
Littman, R. & Takács, Á. (2017). Do all inhibitions act alike? A study of go/no-go and stop-signal paradigms. PLoS ONE, 12., e0186774.
Nilsson, M., Ferholt, B. &Lecusay, R. (2017).The playing-exploring child’: Reconceptualizing the relationship between play and learning in early childhood education.Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 1-15.
Sezgin, E. & Demiriz, S. (2017). Effect of play-based educational programme on behavioral self-regulation skills of 48-60 month-old children. Early Child Development and Care,1, 14, 1100-1113.
Singer, E. (2015). Play and playfulness in early childhood education and care. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 82, 27-35.
Shorer, M., Swissa, O., Levavi, P. & Swissa, A. (2019).Parental playfulness and children’s emotional regulation: the mediating role of parents’ emotional regulation and the parent–child relationship. Early Child Development and Care,1–11.
Slot, P., Mulder, H., Verhagen, J., & Leseman, P. (2017). Preschoolers' cognitive and emotional self‐regulation in pretend play: Relations with executive functions and quality of play. Infant Child Development, e2038. doi: 10.1002/icd.2038
Smirnova, E.O., & Sobkin, V.S. (2017). Research of the game: difficulties and opportunities. [Kul'turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya], 13(3), 83–86.doi: 10.17759/chp.2017130310
Smirnova, E. O., Veraksa, A. N., Bukhalenkova, D. A. & Ryabkova, I. A. (2018). Relationship between play activity and cognitive development in preschool children. [Kul'turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya],14, 4–14.
Sobkin, V.S., & Kaznacheeva, K.N. (2009). Game of a preschool child through the eyes of parents. [Vestnik prakticheskoy psikhologii obrazovaniya],2, 45–54.
Troller-Renfree, S.V., Buzzell, G.A., Bowers, M.E., Salo, V.C., Forman-Alberti, A., Smith, E., & Fox, N.A. (2019). Development of inhibitory control during childhood and its relations to early temperament and later social anxiety: unique insights provided by latent growth modeling and signal detection theory. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 51, 36–51. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13025
Thibodeau, R., Gilpin, A., Brown, M., & Meyer, B. (2016). The effects of fantastical pretend-play on the development of executive functions: An intervention study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 145, 120–138.
Veraksa, A.N., Almazova, O.V., Bukhalenkova, D.A. & Gavrilova, M.N. (2020). The possibility of using role-play to train executive functions in preschoolers. [Kul'turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya],16, 111–121.
Viejo, С., Ortega-Ruiz, R. & Romera, E.M. (2018). Children's play and development. Early Childhood Education, 16-21. doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-5167-6.ch009
Vygotskii, L.S. Voobrazhenie i tvorchestvo v detskom vozraste.––M.: Perspektiva. 2020. – 125.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1966). The game and its role in the mental development of the child. [Voprosy psikhologii], 6, 62–68.
White, R., & Carlson, S. (2016). What would Batman do? Self-distancing improves executive function in young children. Developmental Science, 19, 419–426. doi: 10.1111/desc.12314
Yogman, M., Garner, A, Hutchinson, J., Hirsh-Pasek, K. & Golinkoff, R.M. (2018).The power of play: a pediatric role in enhancing development in young children. Pediatrics,142, e20182058. doi:10.1542/peds.2018-2058
Zelazo P.D. The Dimensional Change Card Sort (DCCS): a method of assessing executive function in children. Nature Protocols, 2006, 1, 297—301.
Zelazo, P.D. (2020). Executive Function and Psychopathology: A Neurodevelopmental Perspective. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology,19, 431-454. doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-072319-024242
Bukhalenkova, D.A. , Gavrilova, M.N., Airapetyan, Z. V., Tarasova K. S., Semenov Yuri I.. Relation between play preferences at home and self-regulation in preschool children. // National Psychological Journal 2020. 2. Pages99-108. doi: 10.11621/npj.2020.0209
Copied to Clipboard
Copy