ISSN 2079-6617
eISSN 2309-9828
Relationship of identity with family image in graduates of closed institutions

Relationship of identity with family image in graduates of closed institutions

PDF (Rus)

Recieved: 04/15/2020

Accepted: 05/08/2020

Published: 10/06/2020

Keywords: identity; family image; family roles; adolescents; closed institution

p.: 85-98

DOI: 10.11621/npj.2020.0208

Available online: 06.10.2020

To cite this article:

Fufaeva Ekaterina V.. Relationship of identity with family image in graduates of closed institutions. // National Psychological Journal 2020. 2. p.85-98. doi: 10.11621/npj.2020.0208

Copied to Clipboard

Copy
Issue 2, 2020

Fufaeva Ekaterina V. Belgorod National Research University, Belgorod, Russia

Abstract

Background. The results of the contemporary research on the psychological characteristics of graduates of closed institutions indicate that adolescents who are brought up in closed institutions have distorted ideas about the family and range from idealized to supernegative. After their graduating from closed institutions, the ideas about the family lie in the basis for establishing their own family, resulting in graduates creating reliable family relationships, leading an asocial lifestyle, sending their children to the same institutions that they have graduated from. The study of the causes of family image distortions in adolescents left without parental care will allow us to work with the causes and,  render aid help graduates of closed institutions to shape a complete, structured family image and thus help them socialize in the human community.

The Objective. Research on the relationship between identity and family image among graduates of closed institutions. We assumed that there is a connection between identity, in terms of its components, and the family image of graduates of closed institutions.

Design. The paper analyzes personal identity and the family image in closed institution graduates, as well as the relationship between the components of identity and the family image of graduates of closed institutions.

Results. The hypothesis was confirmed. The personal identity in terms of structural components (the communicative ‘self’ and the material ‘self’) is associated with the image of the family in closed institution graduates.

Conclusions.The study revealed the need to study the relationship between the components of personal identity and family image.

Illustration 1. Distribution of respondents according to components of identity, (%)

Fig. 1. Distribution of respondents according to components of identity, (%)

social Self

communicative Self

material Self

physical Self

activity Self

perspective Self

reflexive Self

Table 1. Factor analysis of family image assessment inn adolescents

Factor

scale

Factor Load, F

1

jovial

0.669

open

0.687

active

0.62

energetic

0.65

fussy

0.686

sociable

0.709

irritable

0.779

communication

0.69

Table2. Correlation analysis of the relationship between the components of identity and family image

 

Correlation 

Social Self

Communicative Self

Material Self

Physical Self

Spearmen correlation coefficient (R)

Charming

-0.008

-.295*

-0.107

0.21

Irresponsible

-0.18

0.101

0.12

0.095

Good

-0.011

-0.221

-0.181

0.041

Responsive

.248*

0.217

.308*

-0.066

Weak

-0.195

.309*

-0.116

0.12

Dependent

-0.129

0.07

-0.226

-0.184

Sure

-0.087

-.344**

-0.181

-0.011

Open

0.069

.254*

.239*

0.069

Communication

0.042

-0.056

.331**

-0.146

Samrai

-0.167

0.002

0.025

.261*

Symbols

0.086

-0.048

0.088

0.143


* Correlation is significant at the level of 0.05 (two-tailed) 

** Correlation is significant at the level of 0.01 (two-tailed) 

C– list value N = 68

References

  1. Barnhill, L.R. (1979). Healthy family system - Family coordinator, London: Academic Press. doi: 10.2307/583274

  2. Bozhovich, L.I. (1997). Issues of personality development. Moscow, Institut Practicheskoy Psikhologii. Voronezh, NPO Modek.

  3. Cooley, C.H. (1992). Human Nature and the Social Order. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.

  4. Cooley, C.H. (1990). Social Organization: A study of the larger mind. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.

  5. Erikson E.H. (1982). The life cycle completed. New York: Norton.

  6. Erikson E.H., Erikson J. M. (1981) On Generativity and Identity: From a Conversation with Erik and Joan Erikson. Harvard Educational Review, 5 (2), 249–269.doi: 10.17763/haer.51.2.g211757u27732p67

  7. Demidova, N.I. (2003) Shaping the ‘image of the family’ in senior preschoolers: Ph.D. in psychology, thesis. Moscow.

  8. Dubrovina, I.V., & Lisina M.I. (1998). Features of children's mental development in the family and outside the family. Moscow: AST. 

  9. Eidemiller, E.G., & Justitskis V.V. (1987). Clinical and psychological diagnostics of relationships in families of teenagers with psychopathies, character accentuations, neuroses and neurosis-like states: Methodological recommendations. Leningrad: Prosveshchenie.

  10. Erikson, E.H. (1982). The life cycle completed. New York: Norton.

  11. Erikson, E.H. & Erikson J.M. (1981). On Generativity and Identity: From a Conversation with Erik and Joan Erikson. Harvard Educational Review, 5 (2),249–269. doi: 0.17763/haer.51.2.g211757u27732p67

  12. Evdokimova Y.B. Idealized image of the parents as a factor of deviant behaviour in adolescents outside the family: Ph.D. in psychology, thesis. Kaluga.

  13. Freud, A. (2002). A Life Dedicated to Children, New York: Schocken Books.

  14. Freud, А. (1998). The Dream of Psychoanalysis, New York: Addison-Wesley.

  15. Freud, S. (2004). Das Ich und das Es. London: Academic Press. 

  16. Fromm, Е. (1978). The Anatomy of Human Destructiveness, New York: Guilford Publications.

  17. Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. New York: Prentice-Hall.

  18. Kelly, G.A. (1991). The psychology of personal constructs. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  19. Kelly, G.A. (1991). The psychology of personal constructs. 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  20. Kuznetsova, T.V. (2009). Modern approaches to career development in the personality: statement of the problem. Education and society, 5, 26–30.

  21. Levandovskaya, E.A. (2015). Development of the inner world of orphaned teenagers raised in residential institutions: on the example of the Republic of Crimea: Ph.D. in Psychology, thesis. St. Petersburg.

  22. Lisinа, M.I. (1997). Communication, identity and mentality of the child. Voronezh: Rech’, 260.

  23. Locke, J. (1985). Works. In 3 vols. 1. Moscow: Mysl'. 

  24. Mead, H (1934). Mind, Self and Society from the points of a Social Behaviorist. Washington DC: Pew Research Center.

  25. Mukhina, V.S. (1989). Psychological assistance to children raised in residential institutions. [Voprosy psikhologii],1, 32–39.

  26. Moscovici, S. (1981). Оn social representation. London: Academic Press.

  27. Nazarova, I.B. (2000). Adaptation and possible models of mobility of orphans. Moscow: Prosveschenir, 239.

  28. Nedozhogina, N.V. (2005). Developing a positive image of the family in social adolescent orphans in a social shelter. Actual problems of linguistics and methods of teaching foreign languages, 2, 18–25.

  29. Osipova, I.I. (2009). System of prevention of social orphanhood: Ph.D. in Psychology, thesis. Nizhny Novgorod.

  30. Oslon, V.N. (2006). Living arrangements of children-orphans: professional foster family. Moscow: Genezis.

  31. Panyusheva, T.A. & Kapilina, T.D. (2012). Foster child. Way of life, assistance and support. Moscow: Mitpress.

  32. Prikhozhan, A.M. & Tolstykh, N.N. (2003). The psychology of abandonment: Scientific context, history, experimental research of the problem. Moscow: Akademiya, 402.

  33. Putilova, L.M. The essence of self-knowledge in the experience of mental identification (in the context of philosophical anthropology): Ph.D. in Psychology, thesis. Moscow.

  34. Rice, F. (2008). The Adolescent. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

  35. Rogers, C. (1990). Communication: Its Blocking and Its Facilitation. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

  36. Ryzhkova, A.V. (2014). Тhe Image of a family. Moscow: Litpress. 

  37. Savchenko, D. D. Socio-psychological features of adolescents who do not have experience of life in the family: Ph.D. in Psychology, thesis. Moscow.

  38. Seywert, F. (1990). L’évaluation système de la famille. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. 

  39. Simmel, G. (2006). Group Expansion and the Development of Individuality. Classical Sociological Theory. Blackwell Publishing.

  40. Schützenberger, A.A. (1998). The Ancestor Syndrome, Routledge. New York: Arkana.

  41. Snigireva, E.V., Development of intelligence structures in primary school children in various learning conditions: Ph.D. in psychology, thesis. Moscow.

  42. Strokova S.S. (2016). Structural and functional characteristics of the family and features of family identity in adolescents. Counseling psychology and psychotherapy,2,29–46.doi: 10.17759/cpp.2016240203

  43. Shubina, A.S. the Image of the family in the picture of the world of children left without parental care: Ph.D. in Psychology, thesis. Moscow

  44. Shulga, T.I., & Tatarenko D.D. (2005). Psychological features of adolescent orphans who do not have experience of socialization in the family. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie, 5, 90–94.

  45. Tatarintseva, M.S. (2006). The Image of the parent and future family in adolescents from families of different types. [Sovremennaya psikhologiya], 1, 6–8.

  46. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J.C. (2003). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. New York: BrunnerRoutledge.

  47. Tajfel, H. (1981), Human Groups and Social Categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  48. Varga, A.J. Тypes and Structure of the parental relations: Ph.D. in psychology, thesis. Moscow

  49. Vodopyanova L.N., Klimova I.V. & Salkova N. I. (2005). Psycho-emotional features of a child's personality development in an orphanage. [Tezisy vtoroy vserossiyskoy nauchnoy konferentsii «Psikhologicheskie problemy sovremennoy rossiyskoy sem'i»],3, 125–129.

  50. Yabbarova, R.A. (2011). Shaping the image of the family through folk pedagogy in younger schoolers of boarding schools: Ph.D. in Psychology, thesis. Kirov.

  51. Zakovorotnaya, M.V. (1999). Human Identity. Socio-philosophical aspects. Rostov on Don: SKNTs VSh.

To cite this article:

Fufaeva Ekaterina V.. Relationship of identity with family image in graduates of closed institutions. // National Psychological Journal 2020. 2. p.85-98. doi: 10.11621/npj.2020.0208

Copied to Clipboard

Copy