ISSN 2079-6617 (Print)
ISSN 2309-9828 (Online)
Cyberbullying:features, role structure, parent-child relationships and coping strategies

Cyberbullying:features, role structure, parent-child relationships and coping strategies

PDF (Rus)

Recieved: 07/25/2019

Accepted: 08/14/2019

Published: 10/20/2019

p.: 17-31

DOI: 10.11621/npj.2019.0303

Keywords: cyber aggression; cyberbullying; child-parent relations; role pattern; coping strategies

Available online: 20.10.2019

To cite this article:

Soldatova, Galina U. . Cyberbullying:features, role structure, parent-child relationships and coping strategies. // National Psychological Journal 2019. 3. p.17-31. doi: 10.11621/npj.2019.0303

Copied to Clipboard

Issue 3, 2019

Soldatova, Galina U. Lomonosov Moscow State University


Background. The research data indicate the magnitude and significance of the problem of cyberbullying (CB) that cannot be ignored, since a large enough number of children are aggressively targeted online and are often at significant risk if both school bullying and CB take place simultaneously. The novelty of the research consists in an integrated approach to the CB analysis, as one of the cyber aggression types, taking into account its differences from real-life bullying, based on large-scale foreign national and intercultural studies, which can be compared both at the theoretical and methodological level and on the basis of empirical data.

Objective. The analysis of the existing theoretical and practical studies of the CB features and mechanisms in the child-adolescent environment has been carried out within the framework of developmental psychology and social psychology over the recent two decades.

Design. The paper analyzes the features and transformations of the CB role structure in comparison with the bullying in real life, personal characteristics and behavioural strategies of participants (the aggressor, the victim, the chameleon, the observer/witness), considers child-parent relationship in the CB situation and coping strategy with CB.

Findings. The results presented in this review can be used as a basis for further theoretical and empirical research, and also for developing practical programs aimed at supporting victims of CB, reducing the probability of such situations, for timely prevention of CBs, for diagnosing risk groups, and to prepare recommendations for psychologists, teachers and parents in schools and other educational institutions.

Conclusion The CB research topic is acute in connection with the constant development of information and communication technologies (ICT) and requires further study in terms of process in terms of dynamics and development. In order to develop effective prevention and intervention programs it is necessary to develop a common theoretical and methodological framework that will support terminological consensus among researchers and international research. This will allow for reliable comparisons and systematization of empirical data, as well as the development of online risk management and safe use of ICTs.


Allison, K.R., & Bussey, K. (2016). Cyber-bystanding in context: A review of the literature on witnesses' responses to cyberbullying. Children and Youth Services Review, 65, 183–194. 10.1016/j.childyouth.2016.03.026

Appel M., Stiglbauer B., Batinic B., & Holtz P. (2014). Internet use and verbal aggression: The moderating role of parents and peers. Computers in Human Behavior, 33, 235–241. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.007.

Baldry A.C., Farrington D.F., Sorrentino A. (2015). «Am I at risk of cyberbullying»? A narrative review and conceptual framework for research on risk of cyberbullying and cybervictimization: The risk and needs assessment approach. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 23, 36–51. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2015.05.014

Baldry, A. C., & Farrington, D. P. (2000). Bullies and delinquents: Personal characteristics and parental styles. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 10, 17–31. doi:10.1002/ (SICI)1099-1298(200001/02)10:1\17:AID-CASP526[3.0. CO;2-M.

Bandura A. (1985). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliff s, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc, 544.

Barlinska, J., Szuster, A., & Winiewski, M. (2013). Cyberbullying among adolescent bystanders: Role of the communication medium, form of violence, and empathy. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 23, 37–51. Retrieved from: (accessed 02.06.2019).

Bauman S. (2015). Types of Cyberbullying. Cyberbullying: What Counselors Need to Know, 53–58. 10.1002/9781119221685.ch4

Bauman S., Underwood M. K., Card, N. (2013). Definitions: Another perspective and a proposal for beginning with cyberaggression. In S. Bauman, J. Walker & D. Cross (Eds.), Principles of cyberbullying research: Definitions, measures, and methodology. New York, NY: Routledge, 41–46. 10.4324/9780203084601

Bochaver A.A., & Khlomov K.D. (2014). Cyberbullying: bullying in the space of modern technology. [Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki], 11(3), 177–191.

Calvete E., Orue I., Estévez A., Villardón L., & Padilla P. (2010). Cyberbullying in adolescents: Modalities and aggressors’ profile. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1128–1135. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.017

Caravita S., Colombo B., Stefanelli S., & Zigliani R. (2016). Emotional, psychophysiological and behavioral responses elicited by the exposition to cyberbullying situations: Two experimental studies. PsicologíaEducativa, 22(1), 49–59. doi: 10.1016/j.pse.2016.02.003

Cooper, J., Kapur, N., Webb, R., Lawlor, M., Guthrie, E., Mackway-Jones, K., & Appleby, L. (2005). Suicide After Deliberate Self-Harm: A 4-Year Cohort Study. American Journal of Psychiatry, 162(2), 297–303.doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.162.2.297

Coping with Cyberbullying: Final Report. S. Perren&COSTWG5 group, 05.09.2012. Retrieved from: (accessed 02.06.2019).

CyberbullyingResearchCenter, Report 2007-2016 Retrieved from:  (accessed: 03.04.2019).

DeSmet, A., Bastiaensens, S., Van Cleemput, K., Poels, K., Vandebosch, H., Cardon, G., & De Bourdeaudhuij, I. (2016). Deciding whether to look after them, to like it, or leave it: A multidimensional analysis of predictors of positive and negative bystander behavior in cyberbullying among adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 57, 398–415. doi. 10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.051.

DeSmet, A., Bastiaensens, S., Van Cleemput, K., Poels, K., Vandebosch, H., & De Bourdeaudhuij, I. (2012). Mobilizing bystanders of cyberbullying: An exploratory study into behavioural determinants of defending the victim. In B. K. Wiederhold& G. Riva (Eds.), Annual review of cybertherapy and telemedicine 2012: Advanced technologies in the behavioral, social and neurosciences, 58–63. Amsterdam: IOS Press BV. doi: 10.3233/978-1-61499-121-2-58.

Elsaesser, C., Russell, B., Ohannessian, C. M., & Patton, D. (2017). Parenting in a digital age: A review of parents’ role in preventing adolescent cyberbullying. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 35, 62–72. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2017.06.004

Fousiani, K., Dimitropoulou, P., Michaelides, M. P., & Van Petegem, S. (2016). Perceived Parenting and Adolescent Cyber-Bullying: Examining the Intervening Role of Autonomy and Relatedness Need Satisfaction, Empathic Concern and Recognition of Humanness. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 25(7), 2120–2129. doi:10.1007/s10826-016-0401-1.

Grigg D.W. (2010) Cyber-Aggression: Definition and Concept of Cyberbullying. Journal of Psychologists and Counsellors in Schools, 20(2), 143–156.

Haw, C., Hawton, K., Houston, K., & Townsend, E. (2001). Psychiatric and personality disorders in deliberate self-harm patients. British Journal of Psychiatry, 178(01), 48–54. doi:10.1192/bjp.178.1.48.

Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2008). Cyberbullying: An exploratory analysis of factors related to offending and victimization. Deviant behavior, 29(2), 129–156. 10.1080/01639620701457816

Iranzo, B., Buelga, S., Cava, M.J., & Ortega-Barón, J. (2019). Cyberbullying, psychosocial adjustment, and suicidal ideation in adolescence. Psychosocial Intervention, 28, 75–81. doi:10.5093/pi2019a5.

Juvonen, J., & Gross, E.F. (2008). Extending the school grounds?—Bullying experiences in cyberspace. Journal of School health, 78(9), 496–505. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2008.00335.x

Kon I.S. (2006). What is bullying and how to deal with it. [Sem’ya i shkola]. 11, 15–18.

Kowalski, R.M., Giumetti, G.W., Schroeder, A.N., & Lattanner, M.R. (2014). Bullying in the digital age: A critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychological bulletin, 140(4), 1073. doi:10.1037/a0035618.

Kraft, E., & Wang, J. (2010). An exploratory study of the cyberbullying and cyberstalking experiences and factors related to victimization of students at a public liberal arts college. International Journal of Technoethics (IJT), 1(4), 74–91. doi: 10.4018/jte.2010100106

Lagerspetz, K.M., Björkqvist, K., Berts, M., & King, E. (1982). Group aggression among school children in three schools. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 23(1), 45–52. 10.1111/j.1467-9450.1982.tb00412.x

Latane, B., & Darley, J.M. (1968). Group inhibition of bystander intervention in emergencies. Journal of personality and social psychology, 10(3), 215. 10.1037/h0026570

Lessne, D., &Yanez, C. (2017). Student Reports of Bullying: Results from the 2015 School Crime Supplement to the National Crime Victimization Survey (NCES 2017-015). National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, US Department of Education. Washington, DC. RetrievedJanuary. Retrieved from: (accessed: 03.04.2019).

Li, Q. (2007). New bottle but old wine: A research of cyberbullying in schools. Computers in human behavior, 23(4), 1777–1791. 10.1016/j.chb.2005.10.005

Livingstone, S., Haddon, L., Görzig, A., &Ólafsson, K. (2011). EU kids online II: final report 2011. Retrieved from: (accessed: 02.06.2019).

Machackova, H., Dedkova, L., & Mezulanikova, K. (2015). Brief report: The bystander effect in cyberbullying incidents. Journal of adolescence, 43, 96–99. 10.1016/j.adolescence.2015.05.010

Macháčková, H., Dedkova, L., Sevcikova, A., & Cerna, A. (2013). Bystanders' support of cyberbullied schoolmates. Journal of community & applied social psychology, 23(1), 25–36. 10.1002/casp.2135

Makri-Botsari, E., &Karagianni, G. (2014). Cyberbullying in Greek adolescents: The role of parents. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 3241–3253. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.742

Menesini E., Nocentini A., Palladino B. E., Frisén A., Berne S., Ortega-Ruiz R., Calmaestra J., Scheithauer H., Schultze-Krumbholz A., Luik P., Naruskov K., Blaya C., Berthaud J.and Smith P. (2012). Cyberbullying definition among adolescents: A comparison across six European countries. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(9), 455–463. 10.1089/cyber.2012.0040

Modecki, K. L., Minchin, J., Harbaugh, A. G., Guerra, N. G., &Runions, K. C. (2014). Bullying prevalence across contexts: A meta-analysis measuring cyber and traditional bullying. Journal of Adolescent Health, 55(5), 602–611. 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.06.007

Olenik-Shemesh, D., Heiman, T., & Eden, S. (2015). Bystanders’ behavior in cyberbullying episodes: Active and passive patterns in the context of personal-socio-emotional factors. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32, 23–48. doi: 10.1177/0886260515585531.

Olweus, D. (1974). Hakkekyllingerogskoleboller. Forskingomskolemobbing, Oslo: Cappelen.

Olweus, D. (1991). Bully/Victim Problems Among Schoolchildren: Basic Facts and Effects of a School Based Intervention Program (From Development and Treatment of Childhood Aggression, 411–448, DJ Pepler and KH Rubin, eds.).

Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 140.

Olweus, D., & Limber, S. P. (2018). Some problems with cyberbullying research. Current opinion in psychology, 19, 139–143. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.04.012

Orel, A., Campbell, M., Wozencroft, K., Leong, E., & Kimpton, M. (2017). Exploring university students’ coping strategy intentions for cyberbullying. Journal of interpersonal violence, 32(3), 446–462. doi: 10.1177/0886260515586363.

Owens, D., Horrocks, J., & House, A. (2002). Fatal and non-fatal repetition of self-harm: systematic review. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 181(3), 193–199. 10.1192/bjp.181.3.193

PatchinJ. W. (2016). Retrieved from: (accessed: 02.06.2019).

Patchin, J.W., & Hinduja, S. (2006). Bullies move beyond the schoolyard: A preliminary look at cyberbullying. Youth violence and juvenile justice, 4(2), 148–169. 10.1177/1541204006286288

Patchin, J.W., &Hinduja, S. (2017). Digital self-harm among adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 61(6), 761–766. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.06.012.

Pikas, A. (1975). Sa stopparvimobbning [So do we stop bullying]. Stockholm: Prisma.

Pikas, A. (1975). Treatment of Mobbing in School: Principles for and the Results of the Work of an AntiMobbing Group. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 19(1), 1–12. 10.1080/0031383750190101

Rivers, I., &Noret, N. (2010). ‘I h8 u’: findings from a five-year study of text and email bullying. British Educational Research Journal, 36, 643–671. 10.1080/01411920903071918

Runions, K.C., Bak, M., & Cross, D. (2016). Cyber aggression. Encyclopedia of adolescence, 1–10. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-32132-5_780-1.

Sari, S.V. (2016). Was it just joke? Cyberbullying perpetrations and their styles of humor. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 555–559.doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.08.053

Sari, S. V., &Camadan, F. (2016). The new face of violence tendency: Cyber bullying perpetrators and their victims. Computers in human behavior, 59, 317–326. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.027

Slonje, R., & Smith, P. K. (2008). Cyberbullying: Another main type of bullying? Scandinavian journal of psychology, 49(2), 147–154.

Smith, P. K. (2016). Bullying: Definition, types, causes, consequences and intervention. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10(9), 519–532. 10.1111/spc3.12266

Smith, P. K., Mahdavi, J., Carvalho, M., Fisher, S., Russell, S., &Tippett, N. (2008). Cyberbullying: Its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, 49(4), 376–385. 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01846.x

Soldatova G., Zotova E., Lebesheva M., Gir M., & Roggendorf P. (2012). Children of Russia Online. Results of an international project. Moscow, Fond Razvitiya Internet, 213. Retrieved from:  (accessed 02.06.2019).

Soldatova G.U., & Zotova E.Yu. (2011). Cyberbullying in the school environment: a difficult online situation and coping methods. [Obrazovatel'naya politika], 5(55), 11–22.

Soldatova G.U., Lvova E.N., & Permyakova I.D. (2018). The phenomena of traditional bullying and cyberbullying: similarities and differences. In ed. R.V. Ershova [Tsifrovoe obshchestvo kak kul'turno-istoricheskiy kontekst razvitiya cheloveka : sbornik nauchnykh statey i materialov mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii, 14–17 fevralya 2018, Kolomna]. Kolomna, Gosudarstvennyy sotsial'no-gumanitarnyy universitet Kolomna, 380–384.

Soldatova G.U., & Rasskazova E.I. (2014). The safety of adolescents on the Internet: risks, coping and parental mediation. National Psychological Journal, 3(15), 39–51. doi: 10.11621/npj.2014.0305

Soldatova, G., & Zotova, E. (2013). Coping with online risks: The experience of Russian schoolchildren. Journal of Children and Media, 7(1), 44–59. 10.1080/17482798.2012.739766

The Annual Bullying Survey (2017). DitchTheLabel, UnitedKingdom.  Retrieved from:  (accessed: 26.06.2019).

 Thomas, L., Falconer, S., Cross, D., Monks, H., & Brown, D. (2012). Cyberbullying and the Bystander (Report prepared for the Australian Human Rights Commission). Perth, Australia: Child Health Promotion Research Centre, Edith Cowan University. Retrieved from : . (accessed 02.06.2019).

Tokunaga, R. S. (2010). Following you home from school: A critical review and synthesis of research on cyberbullying victimization. Computers in human behavior, 26(3), 277–287.doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2009.11.014

UNESCO, U. (2017). School violence and bullying: Global status report.

 Van Cleemput, K., Vandebosch, H., & Pabian, S. (2014). Personal characteristics and contextual factors that determine “Helping,” “Joining In,” and “Doing Nothing” when witnessing cyberbullying. Aggressive Behavior, 40, 383–396. doi:1 0.1002/ab.21534

Vandoninck, S., & d'Haenens, L. (2015). Children's online coping strategies: Rethinking coping typologies in a risk-specific approach. Journal of adolescence, 45, 225–236. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2015.10.007.

Wang, J., Iannotti, R. J., &Luk, J. W. (2012). Patterns of adolescent bullying behaviors: Physical, verbal, exclusion, rumor, and cyber. Journal of school psychology, 50(4), 521–534. 10.1016/j.jsp.2012.03.004

Whitlock, J., Muehlenkamp, J., Eckenrode, J., Purington, A., Abrams, G. B., Barreira, P., & Kress, V. (2013). Nonsuicidal self-injury as a gateway to suicide in young adults. Journal of Adolescent Health, 52(4), 486–492. 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.09.010

Willard, N.E. (2007). Cyberbullying and cyberthreats: Responding to the challenge of online social aggression, threats, and distress. Research press.

World Health Organization (2016). Health behaviour in school-aged children (HBSC) study: international report from the 2013/2014 survey, Copenhagen, Denmark. Retrieved from:  (accessed: 02.06.2019).

Wright, M.F. (2017). Adolescents' emotional distress and attributions for face-to-face and cyber victimization: Longitudinal linkages to later aggression. Journal of applied developmental psychology, 48, 1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2016.11.002.

Ybarra, M.L., & Mitchell, K.J. (2004). Online aggressor/targets, aggressors, and targets: A comparison of associated youth characteristics. Journal of child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45(7), 1308–1316. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00328.x

Zych, I., Ortega-Ruiz, R., &Marín-López, I. (2016). Cyberbullying: a systematic review of research, its prevalence and assessment issues in Spanish studies. PsicologíaEducativa, 22(1), 5–18. doi: 10.1016/j.pse.2016.03.002.
To cite this article:

Soldatova, Galina U. . Cyberbullying:features, role structure, parent-child relationships and coping strategies. // National Psychological Journal 2019. 3. p.17-31. doi: 10.11621/npj.2019.0303

Copied to Clipboard