ISSN 2079-6617 (Print)
ISSN 2309-9828 (Online)
Lev Vygotsky between two revolutions: on the political self-determination of the scientist

Lev Vygotsky between two revolutions: on the political self-determination of the scientist

PDF (Rus)

Recieved: 09/08/2016

Accepted: 09/20/2016

Published: 10/30/2016

p.: 20-31

DOI: 10.11621/npj.2016.0303

Keywords: cultural-historical psychology; socio-cultural context; L. Vygotsky; Vygotsky L.S.; political self-determination of the scientist; text stylistics

Available online: 30.10.2016

To cite this article:

Vladimir S. Sobkin, Klimova Tatiana A.. Lev Vygotsky between two revolutions: on the political self-determination of the scientist. // National Psychological Journal 2016. 3. p.20-31. doi: 10.11621/npj.2016.0303

Copied to Clipboard

Copy
Issue 3, 2016

Vladimir S. Sobkin Federal Scientific Center of Psychological and Multidisciplinary Research

Klimova Tatiana A. Federal Scientific Center of Psychological and Multidisciplinary Research, Moscow City Pedagogical University

Abstract

The paper presented texts of the three previously unknown Lvygotsky’s journal notes and comments on them. These texts were published in mid-July and early September 1917 in the Jewish weekly «New Path» under the pseudonym «L.S.» and «W». In these texts, Lev Vygotsky describes the features of the political behaviour of the Jewish population in connection with the revolutionary events in Russia. On the one hand, a clear discrepancy between the activation of party work and political rhetoric is mentioned, and on the other hand, reduction of the significance of Jewish communal life is highlighted. As a key characteristic of social and psychological wellbeing of the Jewish population Vygotsky singles out absenteeism, i.e. the lack of interest in politics. Eventually the scientist captures the increase in uncertainty in the Jewish environment and fear of the future political, social and economic reforms in Russia. In the comments on Vygotsky notes, there are definitions relating to the various features of the activities of the Jewish political parties and public organizations, information about various policy documents and staff characterized by social and political situation before the elections in the Consituent Assembly (Uchreditel’noe Sobranie). Particular attention is paid to the analysis of stylistic and structural features of the commented text construction. By implicit quoting the relationship between Vygotsky’s texts and the works of other authors is identified.

Particular attention is paid to the author’s attitude to religious texts, which allows to select a characteristic feature of the «double vision» of real events of the revolution against the background of the Jewish history. The comments help to single out features of the political identity of the young Lev Vygotsky in the period between the two revolutions, which is important to study his biography and understanding of his world view.

References:

(2012) The Bible. Books of the Holy Scriptures, Old and New Testament (canonical). Moscow, Rossiyskoe bibliograficheskoe obschestvo, 1248.

Chekhov, A.P. (1975) Words, words and words Chehov A.P. [Polnoe sobranie sochineniy i pisem]. In 30 Vols. Vol. 2. Moscow, Nauka.

Leontiev, D.A., & Sobkin, V.S. (1994) Psychology of art and psychological methodology in the early works of L.S. Vygotsky. [Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta]. Series 14. Psychology. 4, 35–44.

Sobkin, V.S. (2015) Introductory article. L.S. Vygotsky: the outline of the socio-cultural context. [Vygotsky L.S. Polnoe sobranie sochineniy] in 16 Vols. Vol. 1. Drama and Theatre. Moscow, LEV, 10–75.

Sobkin, V.S. (1981) On the study of the poetics of Vygotsky texts. [Nauchnoe tvorchestvo L.S. Vygotskogo i sovremennaya psikhologiya]. Moscow. 143–145.

Sobkin, V.S. (2015) Comments on the theater reviews of Lev Vygotsky. [L.S. Vygotsky. Theatrical reviews]. Moscow, Institut Sotsiologii Obrazovaniya RAO, 568.

Sobkin, V.S. (2016) Comments on the unknown reportage of L.S. Vygotsky: impressions of the February Revolution. [Voprosy psikhologii]. 5, 88–101.

Sobkin, V.S., & Klimova, T.A. (2016) Unknown Vygotsky: on the experience of translation from the Hebrew. [Voprosy psikhologii]. 4, 1–20.

Sobkin, V.S., & Leontiev, D.A. (1994) Psychology of art and psychological methodology in the early works of L.S. Vygotsky. [Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta]. Series 14. Psychology. 4, 35–44.

Sobkin, V.S., & Mazanova, V.S. (2015) Comments on «Theater and Revolution», the article by L.S. Vygotsky [Kul’turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya]. 1, 91–113.

Sobkin, V.S., & Mazanova, V.S. (2014) Comments on theatrical reviews “Solovtsovskiy troupe tour” of L.S. Vygotsky. [Dialog]. 9, 39–48.

Sobkin, V.S., & Mazanova, V.S. (2014) Comments on the «Theatrical Notes» of L.S. Vygotsky [Kul’turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya]. 3, 82–96.

Sobkin, V.S., & Mazanova, V.S. (2014) What did Homel «Heather» of Lev Vygotsky say: the experience of reconstructing the sociocultural context. [Voprosy psikhologii]. 6, 89–106.

Sobkin, V.S., & Mazanova, V.S. (2014) Previous comments on the theatrical review of L.S. Vygotsky. [National’nyy psikhologicheskiy zhurnal]. 1, 37–48. DOI: 10.11621/npj.2014.0104

Sobkin V.S., Lykova T.A., Kolomiets Y.O. (2016) Dynamics of drama students’ personality features at theatre college. Procedia – social and behavioral sciences, 233, 42–45. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.10.125

Sobkin V.S. (2016) L.S. Vygotsky and the Theater. Journal of Russian & East European Psychology, 53(3), 1–92. doi: 10.1080/10610405.2016.1230996

Vygodskaya, G.L., & Lifanova, T.M. (1996) Lev Vygotsky. A life. Activities. Strokes to the portrait. Moscow, Smysl.

Vygotsky, L.S. (1999) Thinking and speech. Edition 5. Moscow, Labirint, 352.

Vygotsky, L.S. (1987) Psychology of Art. Moscow, Pedagogika, 344.

Zinchenko, V.P. (1997) Mandelstam’s sheperd’s crook and Mamardashvili’s smoking pipe. By the beginning of organic psychology. Moscow, Novaya Shkola, 334.

To cite this article:

Vladimir S. Sobkin, Klimova Tatiana A.. Lev Vygotsky between two revolutions: on the political self-determination of the scientist. // National Psychological Journal 2016. 3. p.20-31. doi: 10.11621/npj.2016.0303

Copied to Clipboard

Copy