Recieved: 01/27/2023
Accepted: 07/04/2024
Published: 09/06/2024
Keywords: attitude to global risks; superstition; belief in the paranormal; self-efficacy; student youth
Pages: 115-127
DOI: 10.11621/npj.2024.0309
Available online: 06.09.2024
Sachkova, М.Е., Semenova, L.E. (2024). Relationship Between Attitude to Global Risks, Belief in the Paranormal and Self-Efficacy among Students. National Psychological Journal, 19(3) , 115-127. https://doi.org/10.11621/npj.2024.0309
Copied to Clipboard
CopyBackground. There is a growing concern about global risks, including among young people in the modern world. At the same time, there also appears information about the wide spread of superstitions and other variants of belief in the paranormal among young people. The appeal to the paranormal occurs primarily in situations of instability and is aimed at reducing anxiety and achieving a sense of security. However, there is still an unspecified question about the nature of the relationship between the attitude to global risks and a number of personal characteristics, including belief in the paranormal and self-efficacy, which in terms of active actions can be considered as the opposite of superstition.
Objective. The goal is to identify the specifics of the relationship between attitudes to global risks and the belief in the paranormal and self-efficacy among students.
Methods. The empirical research was conducted in an online format using psychodiagnostic techniques: “The scale of belief in the paranormal” by J. Tobacyk in the adaptation of D.S. Grigoriev, “The scale of general self-efficacy” by R. Schwarzer and M. Yerusalem in the adaptation of V.G. Romek, the questionnaire “Attitude to global risks” by T.A. Nestik. Statistically significant connections between the structural components of the attitude to global risks with the variants of belief in the paranormal and the personal evaluation of self-efficacy among students were established.
Results. It is found that the attitude of students to global risks is associated with various manifestations of belief in the paranormal. The strongest positive links were found in such components of the attitude to global risks as religious authoritarianism and apocalypticism. On the contrary, negative connections are recorded between the readiness to participate in risk prevention, on the one hand, and faith in predictions and the traditional religious belief of students, on the other hand. A positive relationship between self-efficacy and the cognitive components of the attitude to global risks — optimism and religious authoritarianism — was also found.
Conclusions. The results obtained indicate the substantial proximity of religious authoritarianism and apocalypticism with a belief in the supernatural among students. At the same time, general self-efficacy is a personal characteristic associated with optimism and religious authoritarianism as a strategy for preventing global risks and threats.
Abitov, I.R., Abdulina, R.R. (2023). Features of the Relationship of Superstition with Individual Typological and Personal Characteristics of the Subject. Aktual`ny`e Problemy` Psixologicheskogo Znaniya = Actual Problems of Psychological Knowledge, (4), 34−47. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.51944/20738544_2023_4_34
Andryushkova, N.P. (2016). Psychological Factors of Superstition Among Young People. Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta. Filosofiya. Psixologiya. Sociologiya = Bulletin of the Perm University. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology, 3(27), 46−52. (In Russ.)
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.
Be’ery, G., Ben-Nun Bloom, P. (2015). God and the Welfare State — Substitutes or Complements? An Experimental Test of the Effect of Belief in God’s Control. PLoS ONE, 10(6), e0128858. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128858
Beck, U. (2011). Living in and coping with world risk society. In the Coping with Global Environmental Change, Disasters and Security: Threats, Challenges, Vulnerabilities, and Risks. In: H.G. Brauch, (ed.). (рр. 11–17). New York: Springer Publ.
Bleiler, E. (1981). Autistic thinking. In: Y.B., Gippenreiter, V.V., Petukhov, (eds.). A textbook on general psychology. Psychology of thinking. Moscow: Moscow Univ. Press. (In Russ.)
Boden, M. (2015). Supernatural Beliefs: Considered Adaptive and Associated with Psychological Benefits. Personality and Individual Differences, 86, 227–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.06.023
Boustras, G., Waring, A. (2020). Towards a Reconceptualization of Safety and Security, Their Interactions, and Policy Requirements in a 21st Century Context. Safety Science, 132, 104942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104942
Emelyanova, T.P., Belykh, T.V. (2019). Attitude to Global Risks of Students of Orthodox and Secular Universities. Social’naya Psihologiya i Obshchestvo = Social Psychology and Society, 10(3), 40–50. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2019100303
Grau, R., Martínez, I., Salanova, S. (2002). Safety Attitudes and Their Relationship to Safety Training and Generalised Self-Efficacy.International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics (Jose), 8(1), 23–35.
Grigoriev, D.S. (2015). Adaptation and Validation of the Scale of Belief in the Paranormal In: J. Tobasika, (ed.). Social’naya Psihologiya i Obshchestvo = Social Psychology and Society, 6(2), 132–145. (In Russ.)
Grosheva, L.N. (2004). Social fears among believers and atheists. Diss. Cand. Sci. (Psychol.). Moscow. (In Russ.)
Guseva, E.S. (2014). Gender Aspects of Individual Religiosity. Izvestiya Samarskogo Nauchnogo Centra Rossijskoj Akademii Nauk = Proceedings of the Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 16(2-2), 329–332. (In Russ.)
Izmodenova, N.N. (2013). Superstitions as a Way of Life of Educated Groups of the Population. Trudy Kol’skogo Nauchnogo Centra RAN = Proceedings of the Kola Scientific Center of the RAS, 6(19), 20–35. (In Russ.)
Karaeva, V.Y. (2015). Psychological study of the manifestation of irrational attitudes in specialists of various professions. In the Psychological culture in modern Russian society. All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference. Volgograd: Volgograd branch of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration Publ. (In Russ.)
Katz-Navon, T., Naveh, E., Stern, Z. (2007). Safety Self-efficacy and Safety Performance: Potential Antecedents and the Moderation Effect of Standardization. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, 20(7), 572–584.
Korotkova, M.N., Troshin, I.S. (2017). The attitude of medical personnel to the use of magical rituals, conspiracies and signs in hrofessional activity. In the History and Archeology. Fourth International Scientific Conference. St. Petersburg: Svoe izdatel’stvo Publ. (In Russ.)
Kryukova, T.L. (2010). Psychology of coping behavior in different years of life: а monograph. Kostroma: KSU named after N.A. Nekrasov Publ. (In Russ.)
Lebedev, V.I. (1987). Spirits in the mirror of psychology. Moscow: Sovetskaya Rossiya Publ. (In Russ.)
Leontiev, D.A. (2016). Self-regulation, Resources and Personal Potential. Sibirskij Psiрologicheskij Zhurnal = Siberian Psychological Journal, (62), 18-37. (In Russ.)
Leontiev, D.A., Osin, E.N. (2007). Personal Potential as an Object of Psychodiagnostics. Psihologicheskaya Diagnostika = Psychological Diagnostics, (1), 4–7. (In Russ.)
Levi-Bruhl, L. (1994). Supernatural in primitive thinking. Moscow: Pedagogika-Press. (In Russ.)
Nestik, T.A. (2016). Global Risks as a Psychological Phenomenon. Puti k Miru i Bezopasnosti = Paths to Peace and Security, 1(50), 24–38 (In Russ.)
Nestik, T.A., Nikolaev, E.L. (2020). The Relationship of the Individual’s Attitude to Global Risks with the Fear of Death and Proactive Coping: an Empirical Study. Psihologiya. Zhurnal Vysshej Shkoly Ekonomiki = Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 17(4), 812–821. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8918-2020-4-812-821
Nestik, T.A., Zhuravlev, A.L. (2018). Psychology of global risks. Moscow: Institute of Psychology of the RAS Publ. (In Russ.)
Nestik, T.A., Zhuravlev, A.L. (eds.). (2020). Man in conditions of global risks: socio-psychological analysis. Moscow: Institute of Psychology of the RAS Publ. (In Russ.)
Olshansky, D.V. (2002). Psychology of the masses. St. Petersburg: Piter Publ. (In Russ.)
Pocheptsov, G.G. (2000). Psychological wars. Moscow: Refl-buk Publ. (In Russ.)
Pogorelov, A.A. (2012). Self-efficacy as a Predictor of Effective and Safe Behavior of a Person. Izvestiya Yuzhnogo Federal’nogo Universiteta. Tekhnicheskie Nauki = Proceedings of the Southern Federal University. Technical Sciences, 129(4), 140–145. (In Russ.)
Rogers, P., Qualter, P., Phelps, G., Gardner, K. (2006). Belief in the Paranormal, Coping and Emotional Intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 41(6), 1089–1105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.04.014
Saenko, Y.V. (2004). Superstitions of Modern Students. Voprosy Psikhologii, (4), 122–130. (In Russ.)
Saenko Y.V. (2006). Psychological Aspects of the Study of Superstitions. Voprosy Psikhologii, (6), 85–97. (In Russ.)
Saucier, D. (2010). Insight Offered into Superstitious Behavior. Kansas State University. Science Daily. URL: www.sciencedaily. com/releases/2010/09/100902131736.html (accessed: 19.05.2024).
Schimmel, S. (2000). Vices, Virtues and Sources of Human Strength in Historical Perspective. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19(1), 137–150.
Schwarzer, R., Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale. Windsor: Nfer-Nelson Publ.
Schwarzer, R., Yerusalem, M., Romek, V.G. (1996). Russian Version of the Scale of General Self-efficacy. Inostrannaya Psihologiya = Foreign Psychology, (7), 71–77. (In Russ.)
Seligman, M.E. (1975). Helplessnes: On depression, development, and death. San Francisco: Freeman Publ.
Semenova, L.E., Chevachina, A.V., Semenova, V.E. (2015). Gender Specificity of the Ideas of Modern Russian Youth about Religion and the Motives for Turning to it. Sovremennye Problemy Nauki i Obrazovaniya = Modern Problems of Science and Education, 2(3). URL: https://science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=23343 (accessed: 21.01.2023). (In Russ.)
Strogalshchikova, M.Y. (2012). Socio-psychological features of the phenomenon of superstition. Diss. Cand. Sci. (Psychol.). Moscow. (In Russ.)
Tkachuk, G.S., Bespalova, T.M. (2022). The Influence of Age and Gender Characteristics on the Propensity to Superstition. Koncept = Concept. URL: http://e-koncept.ru/2022/0.htm (accessed: 21.01.2023). (In Russ.)
Tobacyk, J., Milford, G. (1983). Belief in Paranormal Phenomena: Assessment Instrument Development and Implications for Personality Functioning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(5), 648–655.
Tobalov, Y.P. (2004). Coping with difficult life situations for believers: based on the material of Orthodox Christians and Muslims. Diss. Cand. Sci. (Psychol.). Moscow. (In Russ.)
Tolochek, V.A. (2013). About the Possibility of New Approaches to the Professional Development of the Subject. Psikhologiya. Ekonomika. Pravo = Psychology. Economics. Law, (1), 6–15. (In Russ.)
Voronezhsky, I.S., Zinchenko, Y.G. (2016). The Place of Superstitions in the Student Environment. Elektronnyj Vestnik Rostovskogo Social’no-ekonomicheskogo Instituta = Electronic Bulletin of the Rostov Socio-Economic Institute, (2), 16–18. (In Russ.)
Vyse, S. (2020). The Psychology of Superstition. Superstition: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford Academic: Online Edn. URL: https://oceanofpdf.com/authors/stuart-vyse/pdf-epub-superstition-a-very-short-introduction-download-70197564409/ (accessed: 19.05.2024).
Yurevich, A.V., Yurevich, M.A. (2013). Credulity and Skepticism in the Student Environment. Sociologiya Nauki i Tekhnologij = Sociology of Science and Technology, (3), 127–137. (In Russ.)
Sachkova, М.Е., Semenova, L.E.. Relationship Between Attitude to Global Risks, Belief in the Paranormal and Self-Efficacy among Students. // National Psychological Journal 2024. 3. Pages115-127. doi: 10.11621/npj.2024.0309
Copied to Clipboard
Copy