ISSN 2079-6617
eISSN 2309-9828
On the plastic component of creativity

On the plastic component of creativity

PDF (Rus)

Recieved: 01/23/2023

Accepted: 06/03/2023

Published: 08/21/2023

Keywords: creativity; giftedness; anxiety; plasticity; activity; contemplation; androgyny; Zenkovsky; Plato; Jung; Anthony of Surozh

p.: 46-54

DOI: 10.11621/npj.2023.0306

Available online: 21.08.2023

To cite this article:

Melik-Pashayev A.A.. On the plastic component of creativity. // National Psychological Journal 2023. 3. p.46-54. doi: 10.11621/npj.2023.0306

Copied to Clipboard

Issue 3, 2023

Melik-Pashayev A.A. Federal Scientific Center of Psychological and Multidisciplinary Research


Background. The problem of creativity and giftedness, due to the specifics of the subject, does not lend itself well to traditional methods of scientific research. In addition, psychology is occupied almost exclusively with intellectual giftedness, and the problem of artistic giftedness remains the least developed.

Objective of the work is to outline the path to understanding personal qualities of the artist-creator as the psychological conditions for the birth and implementation of artistic ideas.

Methods. Analysis and generalization of data from psychological, philosophical, theological literature and self-reports of art masters on the problems of artistic creativity and the creative nature of human.

Results. It is shown that the essence of artistic and creative giftedness is impossible to understand by studying individual personality traits statistically associated with it. Another way, found to be promising, is the study of giftedness as a free manifestation of initiative in a particular activity. However, this activity must be supplemented and preceded by a “plastic” ability to perceive reality contemplatively. As the masters of art themselves testify, a truly artistic idea is not initially generated by the artist’s arbitrary activity, it is rather perceived as something unexpected and requiring realization by means of one or another art. In this regard, the article raises the question of the male-female, androgynous nature of a creative person. Examples are given of how this problem was comprehended at the bodily, mental and spiritual levels.

Conclusion. An artist, as well as a teacher of art disciplines, needs to overcome the one-sided “masculine” approach to creativity as an activity and pay attention to the need to educate in himself (or in his students) the ability to “creative contemplation” of life. This spiritual and practical task cannot be solved with the help of methodological recommendations of a general order, it requires individual internal work. Never the less, there are examples that show that this task is solvable and suggest possible solutions. Favorable psychological conditions that children are endowed with make it solvable in pedagogical practice.


Akhmatova, A.A. (1965). Running of time. M., L.: Sovetskii pisatel’. (In Russ.).

Antonii. (2002). Metropolitan of Surozh. Proceedings. Part one. M.: Praktika. (In Russ.).

Antonii. (2007). Metropolitan of Surozh. Proceedings. Part two. M.: Praktika. (In Russ.).

Ardalan, N., Bakhtiar, L. (1973). The Sense of Unity: The Sufi Tradition in Persian Architecture. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.

Bem, S. (2004). Gender lenses: Transformation of views on the problem of gender inequality. M.: Rossiiskaya politicheskaya entsiklopediya. (In Russ.).

Bem, S.L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42 (2), 155–162. Bogoyavlenskaya, D.B. (2021). Mechanisms of creativity: why do we discover new things? Voprosy filosofii(Questions in Philosofy), 9, 82–89. (In Russ.).

Chekhov, M.A. (1995). Diary of Quixote. Literary heritage. T. 2. M.: Iskusstvo. (In Russ.).

Chiksentmikhaii, M. (2019). Creativity. Flow and psychology of discoveries and inventions. M.: Kar’era Press. (In Russ.).

Coomarasvamy, A. (1956). The transformation of nature in art. N.Y.: Dover Publications, Inc.

Druzhinin, V.N. (2001). Cognitive abilities, diagnostics, development. M.: PER SE; SPb.: Imaton. (In Russ.).

Efroimson, V.P. (1988). Genetics of genius. M.: Izdatel’stvo AST. (In Russ.).

Galton, F. (1869). Hereditary genius. An inquiry into its laws and consequences. L.: Macmillan Publishers.

Gete, I.-V. (1976). Poetry and truth. Collected works: in 10 t. T. 3. M.: Izdatel’stvo khudozhestvennoi literatury. (In Russ.).

Ideas of aesthetic education. (1973). T. 1. M.: Iskusstvo. (In Russ.).

Kashapov, M.M., Kudryavtseva, A.A. (2001). Anxiety and anxiety as a personal resource. Yaroslavskii psikhologicheskii vestnik (Yaroslavl’ Psychology Bulletin), 1 (49), 22–26. (In Russ.).

Khazrat Inaiyat Khan. (1997). Mysticism of sound. M.: Sfera. (In Russ.).

Lopatin, L.M. (1889). The question of free will. M.: Tipografiya A. Gattsuka. (In Russ.).

Maksimova, S.V. (2010). Influence of interaction between parents and children on the manifestation of creative activity of children. Vneshkol’nik, 4, 35–40. (In Russ.).

Mei, R. (2001). Sense of anxiety. M.: Klass. (In Russ.).

Melik-Pashaev, A.A. (2000). The artist’s world. M.: Progress-traditsiya. (In Russ.).

Melik-Pashaev, A.A. (2020). Dominant and creativity. Voprosy psikhologii (Issues of Psychology), 3, 80–91. (In Russ.).

Melik-Pashaev, A.A., Novlyanskaya, Z.N. (2014). The origins and specifics of children’s artistic creativity. M.: Navigator. (In Russ.).

Melik-Pashaev, A.A., Novlyanskaya, Z.N. (2022a). The artist in the child. Natsional’nyi psikhologicheskii zhurnal (National psychological journal), 3 (47), 26–34. (In Russ.).

Melik-Pashaev, A.A., Novlyanskaya, Z.N. (2022b). Psychology of Artistic creativity. M.: Izdatel’stvo Moskovskogo universiteta. (In Russ.).

Merton, T. (2011). Internal experience. Notes on contemplation. M.: Obshchedostupnyi pravoslavnyi universitet, osnovannyi protoiereem Aleksandrom Menem. (In Russ.).

Nikonenko, N.V. (2017). The relationship of creativity and anxiety in older preschool children. Education and training: theory, methodology and practice. Cheboksary.: TsNS “Interaktiv plyus”. (In Russ.).

Novlyanskaya, Z.N. (2010). Teaching and creativity. M.: PI RAO. (In Russ.).

Novlyanskaya, Z.N. (2016). The formation of the author’s position in children’s literary creativity. M.: Author’ Club. (In Russ.).

Novlyanskaya, Z.N. (2022). Is it possible to teach creativity? About the manifestations of children’s initiative in the process of developing learning literature. Voprosy psikhologii (Issues of Psychology), 68, 2, 111–123. (In Russ.).

Platon (1965). Selected dialogues. Edited by V. Asmus. M.: Izdatel’stvo khudozhestvennoi literatury. (In Russ.).

Prikhozhan, A.M. (2009). Psychology of anxiety. Preschool and school age. SPb.: Piter. (In Russ.).

Prishvin, M.M. (1996). By the power of kindred attention. M.: Iskusstvo v shkole. (In Russ.).

Pushkin, A.S. (1949). Complete works in one volume. M.: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel’stvo khudozhestvennoi literatury. (In Russ.).

Renzulli, J.S. (2012). Reexamining the Role of Gifted Education and Talent Development for the 21st Century: A Four-Part Theoretical Approach. Gifted Child Quarterly, 56 (3), 150–159.

Rinn, A.N., Majority, K.L. (2018). The social and emotional word of the gifted. In S.I. Pfeiffer (Eds.), Handbook of Giftedness in Children (pp. 49–63). Cham: Springer.

Shcheblanova, E.I., Petrova, S.O. (2021). Modern foreign studies of anxiety of intellectually gifted schoolchildren. Sovremennaya zarubezhnaya psikhologiya (Modern Foreign Psychology), T. 10, 4. 97–106. (In Russ.).

Sobkin, V.S., Lykova, T.A., Sobkina, A.V. (2021). Psychology of an actor: the beginning of a professional path. M.: FGBNU “IUO RAO”. (In Russ.).

Tolstoi, A.K. (1907). Complete works. T. 1. S.-Peterburg.: Izdanie A.F. Marksa. (In Russ.).

Tsukerman, G.A. (2019). About the criteria of activity pedagogy. Kul’turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya (Cultural-historical Psychology), T. 15, 3, 105–116. (In Russ.).

Tsvetaeva, M.I. (1991). About art. M.: Iskusstvo. (In Russ.).

Tyutchev, F.I. (1965). Lyrica. M.: Nauka. (In Russ.).

Yung, K. (1991). About the archetypes of the collective unconscious. Archetype and symbol. М.: Renaissance. (In Russ.).

Yung, K. (2003). Psychological problems of marriage. The spirit is in man, art, literature. Minsk: Kharvest. (In Russ.).

Zen’kovskii, V.V. (1914). The problem of mental causality. Kiev: Tip. Imp. un-ta sv. Vladimira. (In Russ.).
To cite this article:

Melik-Pashayev A.A.. On the plastic component of creativity. // National Psychological Journal 2023. 3. p.46-54. doi: 10.11621/npj.2023.0306

Copied to Clipboard