Background. Like evidence-based medicine, clinical psychology is interested in obtaining results that can be extrapolated to many areas of studying the human psyche. Meta-analysis is the method of obtaining results that can be used in other areas of psychological research. The study of meta-analysis in relation to clinical psychology is of particular importance.
The Objective of this research is to analyze the features of using meta-analysis in clinical psychology, to show its limitations and procedure. Design. At the initial stage of our theoretical research, the main directions and tasks of using meta-analysis in clinical psychology were analyzed. The next step was the description of the meta-analytical clinical and psychological research procedure. The solution of tasks identified in this work are the basis of meta-analytical research in clinical psychology.
Results. In clinical and psychological research, meta-analysis was found to be used in evaluating the effectiveness of behavioural, cognitive, and cognitive-behavioural therapy, psycho-pharmacological interventions in schizophrenia, anxiety and depressive disorders, chronic fatigue, personality pathology, and autistic spectrum disorders.
A separate part of the research embraces the assessment results of the influence of various factors on the psychopathology. The difficulties of using meta-analysis in clinical psychology were described.
Conclusion. Meta-analysis is a powerful tool for obtaining data in clinical psychology; thanks to him, it becomes possible to generalize the results of a multitude of clinical and psychological studies and to evaluate the effectiveness of various types of psychosocial interventions.
Sections: Methods, Technologies, Tools;
PDF: Download
Keywords: meta-analysis; clinical psychology; psychotherapy; meta-analysis procedure;
Available Online 31.12.2019
Åhlén, J., Lenhard, F. & Ghaderi, A. (2015). Universal Prevention for Anxiety and Depressive Symptoms in Children: A Meta-analysis of Randomized and Cluster-Randomized Trials. Journal of Primary Prevention, 36(6), 387–403. doi: 10.1007/s10935-015-0405-4
Barber, J. P., & Milrod, B. (2004). Pitfalls of meta-analyses. American Journal of Psychiatry, 161, 1131. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.161.6.1131
Bardone-Cone, A.M., Sturm, K., Lawson, M.A., Robinson, D.P., & Smith, R. (2010). Perfectionism across stages of recovery from eating disorders. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 43, 139–148. doi: 10.1002/eat.20674
Bezeau, S. & Graves, R. (2001). Statistical power and effect sizes of clinical neuropsychological research. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 23, 399–406. doi: 10.1076/jcen.23.3.399.1181
Cheung, S.F., & Chan, D.K.S. (2004). Dependent effect sizes in meta-analysis: Incorporating the degree of interdependence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 780–791. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.780
Christoph Flückiger, A.C. Del Re, Jürgen Barth, William T. Hoyt, Heidi Levitt, Thomas Munder, Glen I. Spielmans, Joshua K. Swift, Andreea Vîslă & Bruce E. Wampold (2018). Considerations of how to conduct meta-analyses in psychological interventions, Psychotherapy Research, 28(3), 329–332. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2018.1430390
Cooper, H. (1998). Synthesyzing research: A guide for literature reviews (3ª ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Cooper, H. (2008). The search for meaningful ways to express the effects of interventions. Child Development Perspectives, 2, 181–186. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-8606.2008.00063.x
Durlak, J. A. (2003). Basic principles of meta-analysis. In Roberts, M., & Ilardi, S. S. (Eds.), Methods ofresearch in clinical psychology: A Handbook, 196–209. doi: 10.1002/9780470756980.ch10
Durlak, J.A., & Wells, A M. (1997). Primary prevention mental health programs for children and adolescents: A meta-analytic review. American Journal of Community Psychology, 25, 114–152. doi: 10.1023/A:1024654026646
Feinstein, A R. (1995). Meta-analysis: Statistical alchemy for the 21st century. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 48, 71–79. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(94)00110-C
Field A P. (2013). Meta-analysis in clinical psychology research. In J.S. Comer & P.C. Kendall (Eds.), Oxford library of psychology. The Oxford handbook of research strategies for clinical psychology. New York, NY, US: Oxford University Press, 317–335. doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199793549.013.0017
Galvan, J.L. (2004). Writing literature reviews. Glendale, CA: Pyczak.
Greenwald, A.G. (1975) Consequences of Prejudice against the Null Hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 82, 1–20. doi: 10.1037/h0076157
Hakulinen, C., Elovainio, M., Pulkki‐Råback, L., Virtanen, M., Kivimäki, M., & Jokela, M. (2015). Personality and depressive symptoms: Individual participant meta‐analysis of 10 cohort studies. Depression and Anxiety, 32(7), 461–470. doi: 10.1002/da.22376
Hedges, L. V. & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods of meta-analysis. Orlando: Academic Press.
Higgins, J.P., Thompson, S.G., Deeks, J.J., & Altman, D.G. (2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. British Medical Journal, 327, 557–560. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557
Hunter, J.E. & Schmidt, F.L. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. doi: 10.4135/9781412985031
Lipsey, M.W. & Wilson, D.B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
McLeod, B.D., & Weisz, J.R. (2004). Using dissertations to examine potential bias in child and adolescent clinical trials. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72, 235–251. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.72.2.235
Medway, F.J., & Updyke, J.F. (1985). Meta-analysis of consultation outcome studies. American Journal of Community Psychology, 13, 489–505. doi: 10.1007/BF00923263
Morris, S.B. & DeShon, R.P. (2002). Combining effect sizes estimates in meta-analysis with repeated measures and independent-group designs. Psychological Methods, 7, 105–125. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.105
Kornilov S.A., & Kornilova T.V. (2010). Meta-analytical studies in psychology. [Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal], 6, 5–17.
Novokhatsky A.V. (2010). The principles of evidence-based medicine in clinical psychology: a modern approach to making objective clinical decisions. [Vestnik Yuzhno-Ural’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta]. Series: Psychology, 17, 85–88.
Oliveras, I., Losilla, J.M., & Vives, J. (2017) Methodological quality is underrated in systematic reviews and meta-analyses in health psychology. J Clin Epidemiol, Jun; 86, 59–70. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.05.002
Oxman A.D., & Guyatt, G.H. (1991). Validation of an index of the quality of review articles. J Clin Epidemiol, 44, 1271–1278. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(91)90160-B
Rosenthal, R. (1979). The “file-drawer problem” and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 638–641. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638
Rosenthal, R. (1995). Writing meta-analytic reviews. Psychological Bulletin, 18, 183–192. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.118.2.183
Sterling, T.D. (1959). Publication decisions and their possible effects on inferences drawn from tests of significance – or vice versa. J Am Stat Assoc; 54, 30–34. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1959.10501497
Weisz, J.R., Jensen-Doss, A., & Hawley, K.M. (2006). Evidence-based youth psychotherapies versus usual clinical care: A meta-analysis of direct comparisons. American Psychologist, 61(7), 671– 689. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.61.7.671
Weisz, J.R., Weiss, B., Alicke, M.D., & Klotz, M.L. (1987). Effectiveness of psychotherapy with children and adolescents: A meta-analysis for clinicians. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 542–549. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.55.4.542
Wilson, D.B., & Lipsey, M.W. (2001). The role of method in treatment effectiveness research: Evidence from meta-analysis. Psychological Methods, 6, 413–429. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.6.4.413
Zakzanis, K.K. (2001). Statistics to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth: formulae, illustrative numerical examples, and heuristic interpretation of effect size analyses for neuropsychological researchers. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 16, 653–66. doi: 10.1093/arclin/16.7.653
Zinchenko Yu.P. (2011). Methodological problems of fundamental and applied psychological research. National Psychological Journal. 1(5), 42–49.
Lifintsev D.V., Serykh A.B., Lifintseva A.А., Novikova J.Yu. (2018) Meta-analysis in clinical psychology. National Psychological Journal, [Natsional’nyy psikhologicheskiy zhurnal], 11(1), 46–52.