The paper proves the assumption that being a worldview of the information society postmodernism simultaneously reverberates its problems, among which is blurring personal identity. The most vulnerable part of the postmodern ideology is the implicit inability to construct steady architecture of identification. This is hampered by specific ideas related to the fundamental principle of postmodernism, i.e. pluralism leading to relativism and the loss of sustainable landmarks. Applying the pluralism principle to the full may result in unlimited choice production, which should not be considered the achievement of the information society and postmodern culture, but its main problem. The social political consequences of tolerance issues and the equivalence of opinions, attitudes and values are discussed. Lack of preferred self-identification vectors reduces the motivation for the individual to develop a stable personal identity. If no paradigm in terms of the truth can claim a given status disputes over claims of significance turn into controversies over power, thereby generating social Darwinism. The principle of pluralism actually legitimizes radical ideologies, whose extreme form is terrorism put in the mosaic and multicultural postmodern world occurs to be one of many sociocultural paradigms. Exactly the identity crisis in the conditions of mass distribution of both military and information technologies is considered the main cause of radicalism as the result of finding pathological forms of cognitive personal identity. Social cultural and worldview crises of the information society are becoming the main cause for producing endurable and irregular forms of personal identity architecture.
Available Online 28.06.2017
Baudrillard, J. (2012) Transparency of Evil. Moscow.
Emelin, V.A. (2010) Labyrinths of postmodernism: identification of elusive meaning. [Nauchnyy informatsionno-analiticheskiy, kul’turno-prosvetitel’skiy zhurnal Gosudarstvo, religiya, tserkov’ v Rossii i za rubezhom], 3, 65–75.
Emelin, V.A. (2010) Terrorism as a radical reaction to the identity crisis. National Psychological Journal, 2, 47–51.
Epstein, M.N. (1996) Proto-or the end of postmodernism. [Znamya], 3, 196–209.
Five animals that ran for the post of mayor ... and won! [Moya kopilka interesnogo interneta]. Retrieved from: http://www.kukharski.net/interesting/pyaterka-zhivotnyx-merov.html (Accessed: August 31, 2016)
Frank, M. (1994) Political aspects of the new French thinking. [Logos], 6, 323–326.
Freud, S. (2005) Totem and the Taboo. St. Petersburg.
Foucault, M. (1998) The history of sexuality-3: Taking care of oneself. Kiev, Dukh i litera, Grunt; Moscow, Refl-buk, 288.
Galkin, D.V. (2002) Jean Baudrillard. [Istoriya filosofii. Entsiklopediya], Minsk, 121.
Gorzhalkan, E. The technology of destruction. (January 14, 2014). Retrieved from: http://zuhel.livejournal.com/465630.html (accessed: October 18, 2016).
Gubman, B.L. (1997) Western philosophy of culture of the twentieth century. Tver’, Lean.
Dostoevsky F.M. (1990) The Possessed. Collected Works in 15 vols. Vol. 7. Leningrad.
Is incest the social tradition of Norway? [Rus’-front: informatsionnyy pravoslavnyy vestnik] Retrieved from: http://www.rusfront.ru/5676-incest-socialnaya-tradiciya-norvegii.html (accessed: 18.10.2016).
Karasev, L.V. (1997) Today and tomorrow. Postmodernism and culture. Proceedings of the «round table». [Vopsosy filosofii], 12, 1527.
Kozlowski, P. (1997) Culture of postmodernity. Moscow, Respublika.
Kudryashov, N.N. And others. «We love – we do not love ...» (A few notes in defense of postmodernism). [Korpus 3]. Retrieved form: http:// www.33plus1.ru/Decor/Fine_Monumental_Art/ARTICLE/KORPUS3.htm (Accessed: August 31, 2016)
Kuritsyn, V.N. (1997) Time to multiply the console. To the concept of post-postmodernism. [Oktyabr’], 7, 179–183.
Kusainov, A.A. (2003) «New French Philosophy» and the culture of postmodernity. Volgograd, Izdatel’stvo VolGU.
Levi, B. H. (1979) Le testament de Dieu. P., Grasset.
Lyotard, J.-F. (1982) Reponse a la question: Qu’est ce que le postmoderne? Critique. Para, 357–367.
Man’kovskaya, N.B. (1999) From modernism to post-postmodernism: via postmodernism. [Kollazh-2: sotsial’no-filosofskiy i filosofsko-antropologicheskiy al’manakh]. Moscow, IF RAN, 18–25.
Penn, J.M., & Zalesn, E.K. (2009) Microtension. Small changes that lead to big changes. Moscow.
Rozanov, V.V. (1990) Fallen leaves. The second and last box. Moscow, 338.
Rousseau, J.J. (1961) Discourse on the arts and sciences. Selected works. In 3 vols. Vol. 1. Moscow, 47–48.
(2003) Sex in Australia: The Australian study of health and relationships, Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society. Published as the Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, Vol. 27, 2.
Soloviev, A.V. (2009) Dynamics of culture of the information age. Ryazan’.
Taleb, N. The dictatorship of the minority (translation of the excerpt from the draft of a new book by Nassim Taleb). [«Sputnik i pogrom»]. Retrieved from: http://sputNikipogrom.com/society/59789/minority-wins/#.WAdPNmckqUk (Accessed: 18.10.2016)
Turbina E.G. (1993) Post-totalitarian culture: «everything is allowed» or «nothing is guaranteed»? [Voprosy filosofii], 3, 23–28.
Yurasovskaya, N.M. (1993) Is it Postmodernism? [Natsional’nye traditsii i postmodernizm: zhivopis’ i skul’ptura 1960–1980-kh godov v SSSR]. Moscow, GTG, 14–33.
Welsch, W. (1998) Die Postmoderne in Kunst und Philosophie und ihr Verhältnis zum technologischen Zeitalter. Technologisches Zeitalter order Postmoderne. München, Fink, 36–72.
Welsch, W. (1995) Postmodern art and philosophy and its relation to the technological epoch. [Na putyakh postmodernizma]. Moscow, INION RAS, 168–184.
Emelin V.A. (2017). The postmodern crisis and the loss of stable identity. National Psychological Journal. 2, 5-15.