There are more than a dozen of personality theories in psychology currently. However, among psychologists there is no general agreement in understanding personality as a psychological reality, i.e. the agreement of phenomena opened to introspection and the facts established by observing the activity of the subject and his/her products, all together designated by the term «personality». The authors of these theories are dealing with very different phenomena and facts, sometimes not quite compatible ones, making impossible comparative analysis based on the criterion of adequacy, designed to assess the extent to which the scientific theory corresponds to the psychological reality explained by it.
Thus, it is useful to turn to the analysis of William James’s works in order to clarify the issue of the psychological reality of the person who according to the author did the most thorough job of identifying the basic phenomena and facts that need be referred to using the term «personality». The results of this study allowed to draw the following conclusions.
From James’s point of view, the psychological reality of personality must include the phenomenon of personal ego and the fact of hierarchically organized motivational sphere that has been developed as a result of individual’s self-determination. James’s representations have withstood the test of time, they were in demand by a number of renowned theorists of personality especially those that considered consciousness as a subject matter of scientific psychology. Perpetual interest in James’s concept of personality among theorists turns to be quite durable in time and is a subject matter of psychological reality.
Adler, A. (1997) Science of living. Kiev, Port-Royal.
Allport, G. (2002) Development of personality: selected works. Moscow, Smysl.
Asmolov, A.G. (2007) Personality psychology: Cultural and historical understanding of human development. Moscow, Smysl, Akademiya.
Bandura, A. (2000) Social learning theory. St. Petersburg, Eurasia.
Berne, E. (1988) Games People Play. Psychology of human relationships. People who play games. Psychology of human destiny. Moscow, Progress.
Bratus’, B.S. (1988) Anomalies of personality. Moscow, Mysl’.
Erikson, E. (1996) Identity: Youth and Crisis. Moscow, Progress.
Eysenck, H.J. (1999) Personality structure. St. Petersburg, Yuventa, Moscow: KSP +.
Frager, R., & Fadiman, D. (2001) Personality: theory, experiments, exercises. St. Petersburg, Praym.
Frankl, V. (1990) Man in search of meaning: collection of papers. Moscow, Progress.
Freud, S. (1989) Introduction to Psychoanalysis: Lectures. Moscow, Nauka.
Fromm E. Psychoanalysis and Ethics. – Moscow: Republic, 1993.
Gross, R.D. (1992) Psychology: The Science of Mind and Behaviour. L., Sidney, Auckland: Hodder and Stoughton.
Hall, K., & Lindsay, G. (1997) Personality theories. Moscow, KSP +.
Hjelle, L., & Ziegler, D. (1997) Theories of personality. St. Petersburg, Piter.
Ivannikov, V.A. (2010) Fundamentals of Psychology: a course of lectures. St. Petersburg, Piter.
James, W. (1991) Psychology. Moscow, Pedagogika.
James, W. (2003) Scientific basis of psychology. Minsk, Harvest.
Jung, K. (1994) Psychology of the Unconscious. Moscow, Kanon.
Jung, K. (1998) The Tavistock lectures. Moscow, Refl-book, Kiev, Vakler.
J. Kelly (2000) The theory of personality. Psychology of personal constructs. St. Petersburg, Rech’.
Leontiev, A.N. (1975) Activities. Consciousness. Personality. Moscow, Politizdat.
Maddi, S. (2002) Theories of personality: a comparative analysis. St. Petersburg, Rech’.
Maslow, A. (1999) Motivation and Personality. St. Petersburg, Evrazia.
Rogers K. (2007) Person-centered therapy: theory and application of modern practice. Moscow, Psikhoterapiya.
Rubinstein, S.L. (1989) Fundamentals of general psychology: In 2 vols. Vol. 2. Moscow, Pedagogika.
Rogers, C.R. (1959) A Theory of Therapy, Personality and Interpersonal Relationships as Developed in the Client-Centered Framework. [S. Koch (ed.). Psychology: a Study of a Science]. New York: McGrow Hill, Vol. 3, 184-256.
Vilyunas, V.K. (2006) Psychology of motivation. St. Petersburg, Rech’.
Kapustin S.A. (2017). The contribution of W. James to the understanding of personality as a psychological reality. National Psychological Journal. 1, 64-71.