ISSN 2079-6617
eISSN 2309-9828
Articles

Article

MainArticlesVolumes

Dorontsova Olga A. (2015). The potential of the system of interpersonal interaction in the formation of adolescent autonomy. National Psychological Journal. 4, 111-118.

Abstract

The paper discusses a significant and actual issue of developing autonomy of the individual. Special attention is paid to adolescent age having high potential for developing autonomy in view of certain changes in the psychological and social sphere of the adolescents. The value of interpersonal interaction in the course of developing adolescent autonomy is shown.

The approaches to the concept of interaction are analyzed, four main directions of explaining the essence of interaction are allocated: symbolical interactionism (J. Mid), social exchange (J. Homans, G. Blumer), sociodramatic touch (E. Goffman) transaction analysis (E. Berne). Types of interaction, efficiency of interaction development are considered.

The analysis of interpersonal interaction issues shows its communication with the categories of «relation», «communication» and «joint activity» (B.G. Ananyev, G.M. Andreyeva, S.V. Dukhnovsky, Ya.L. Kolominsky V.N. Kunitsyna, V.N. Myasishchev, B.D. Parygin, etc.). The concept of interpersonal interaction system of the autonomy causing development of adolescence in the paradigm of psychologist-teacher interaction, and also child-parent interaction is described. The advantage of psychological assistance and pedagogical support within the system of interpersonal interaction for further development of adolescent autonomy is proved.

The value of cooperation as one of the types of interpersonal interaction in the course of adolescent autonomy development is shown. Mechanisms of interpersonal interaction, nature of contact in interpersonal interaction, components of a social situation are described.

Received: 09/28/2015
Accepted: 11/17/2015
Pages: 111-118
DOI: 10.11621/npj.2015.0411

PDF: Download

Keywords: system of interpersonal interaction; autonomy; adolescent age; relationships; interaction; activity; psychological assistance and pedagogical support;

Available Online 31.12.2015

References:

Abulkhanova-Slavskaya, K.A. (2009) Philosophical and psychological concept of S.L. Rubinstein. Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal [Psychological magazine]. Vol. 30, 5, 26-45.

Andreeva, G.M. (2002) Social psychology. Moscow, Aspekt Press, 364.

Asmolov, A.G. (2013). Strategy and methodology for the sociocultural reform of education. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 6(1), 3-20. doi: 10.11621/pir.2013.0101

Belikov, V.A. (2010) Education. Activities. Personality: monograph: manual for students in higher education. Moscow, Akademiya Estestvoznaniya, 339.

Berne, E. (1995) Games People Play. Psychology of human relations. St. Petersburg, Spetsial’naya literatura, 397.

Dergacheva, O.E. (2011) Personal autonomy as a component of personal potential. Dergacheva, O.E., & Leontiev, D.A. Lichnostnyy potentsial: struktura i diagnostika [Personal potential: Structure and diagnostics]. Moscow, Smysl. 210-240.

Dotsenko, E.L. (1997) Psychology of manipulation: phenomena and mechanisms of protection. Moscow, CheRo; Izdatel’stvo MGU, 344.

Dukhnovsky, S.V. (2014) Personality Psychology relations: Monograph. Kurgan, Izdatel’stvo Kurganskogo gos. universisteta, 380.

Dyachenko, M.I. (2007) Psychological Dictionary Directory. Dyachenko, M.I., Kandybovich, L.A. Minsk, Harvest, 576.

(comp.) Golovin, S.Y. (2007) Dictionary of Practical Psychology. Minsk, Harvest, 976.

Goryanina, V.A. (2002) Psychology of communication: Textbook. Moscow, Akademiya, 416.

Kant, I. (1965) Fundamentals of the Metaphysics of Morals Kant. Sochineniya v 4 tomakh [Works In 4 volumes] Volume 4. Moscow, Mysl’.

Korotaeva, E.V. (2007) Pedagogical communication and technology: Monograph. Moscow, Akademiya, 256.

Kunitsyn, V. (2001) Interpersonal communication: the textbook for high schools. Kunitsyn, V.N., Kazarinova, N.V., & Pogolsha, V.M. St. Petersburg, Piter, 544.

Leontiev, D.A. (2002) From adaptation to symbiosis and autonomy and transcendence. (Ed.) E.I. Yatsuta. Lichnost’ v sovremennom mire: ot strategii vyzhivaniya k strategii zhiznetvorchestva [Personality in the modern world: from survival strategy to creative life]. Kemerovo, Graphics, 3-34.

Leontiev, D.A. (2007) Psychology of Meaning: nature, structure and dynamics of the sense of reality. Moscow, Smysl, 511.

Lomov, B.F. (1984) The problem of communication in psychology. Metodologicheskie i teoreticheskie problemy v psikhologii [Methodological and theoretical problems of psychology]. Moscow, Nauka, 242 -288.

Mitina, O.V., & Sorokina, V.V. (2015) The values of senior pupils: the development of computer diagnostic tools. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta [Bulletin of Moscow University]. Series 14. Psychology, 1, 42-59.

Molchanov S. V. (2014). Conditions and factors of solving moral dilemmas in adolescence. National psychological journal [Natsional’nyy psikhologicheskiy zhurnal], 4, 42-51.

Mudrik, A.V. (1997) Introduction to social pedagogy. Moscow, Institut prakticheskoy psikhologii.

Mukhina, V.S. (2006) Psychology: phenomenology development, childhood, adolescence: textbook for universities. Moscow, Akademiya, 680 p.

Parygin, B.D. (1971) Fundamentals of socio-psychological. Moscow Mysl’, 351.

Poskrebysheva N.N.,Karabanova O.A. (2014).Developmental approach to the study of adolescent personal autonomy. National psychological journal [Natsional’nyy psikhologicheskiy zhurnal], 1, 74-85.

Poskrebysheva N. N., Karabanova O. A. (2014). The research of individual adolescent autonomy in the context of social situation of development. National psychological journal, [Natsional’nyy psikhologicheskiy zhurnal, 4, 34-41.

Rubinstein, S.L. (2010) Basics of general psychology. St. Petersburg, Piter, 713.

Szczepanski, J. (1969) Elementary concepts of sociology. Moscow, Progress, 240.

Ushakov, D.N. (2013) Explanatory Dictionary of Modern Russian. Moscow, Adelant, 800.

Zimnyaya, I.A. (2004) Educational Psychology. Moscow, Logos, 384.

Zuckerman, G.A. (1997) Psychology of self-development: a challenge for teenagers and their teachers. Riga, Experiment, 276.

For citing this article:

Dorontsova Olga A. (2015). The potential of the system of interpersonal interaction in the formation of adolescent autonomy. National Psychological Journal. 4, 111-118.