ISSN 2079-6617 (Print)
ISSN 2309-9828 (Online)
Ru | En
Russian Psychological Society
The Faculty of Psychology. Lomonosov Moscow State University.
Main RSS Search

MainArticlesVolumes

Alaguev M.V. (2021). Entry into intercultural marriage: factors of spouse choice. National Psychological Journal, [Natsional’nyy psikhologicheskiy zhurnal], 2021, (41)1, 63-75. doi: 10.11621/npj.2021.0106

Abstract

Background. Intercultural marriages are micro-level models of intercultural relations and can help to understand the changing society of the globalization era.

The objective. Revealing attitudes towards entry into intercultural marriage and factors influencing the choice of a foreign cultural marriage partner among Russians and Buryats in the Republic of Buryatia.

Design. The study was conducted in 2020 in the Republic of Buryatia using a socio-psychological survey on online platform. The convenience sample was used (the “snowball” method). The sample included representatives of 2 groups: Russians (N = 111) and Buryats (N = 102).

Results. The analysis showed that the attitude towards entry into intercultural marriage in these groups is above average, while no significant differences were found between the groups. The negative attitude towards intercultural marriages among Buryats to a greater extent than among Russians was determined by factors reflecting the acceptance of intercultural marriages by relatives, loved ones and society in general, which was more significant for the Buryats. Among the Russians, more than among the Buryats, negative attitudes were interconnected with factors reflecting personal characteristics of the future spouse (values, norms of behavior) and interpersonal communication. For both the Russians and the Buryats, negative attitude towards entering into intercultural marriages is associated with the importance of proximity of cooking traditions, naming, raising children and their identity, as well as religious beliefs.

Conclusion. The general favorable “Zeitgeist” in Buryatia towards intercultural marriages contributes to the tolerant attitude towards the creation of such married couples among both the Russians and the Buryats.

Received: 02/07/2021
Accepted: 03/10/2021
Pages: 63-75
DOI: 10.11621/npj.2021.0106

Sections: Social Psychology;

PDF:

Keywords: intercultural marriage; attitudes towards intercultural marriage; factors of choosing spouse of a different culture

Available Online 30.03.2021

  1. Abela, A., & Walker, J. (2014). Contemporary issues in family studies: Global perspectives on partnerships, parenting and support in a changing world. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. doi: 10.1002/9781118320990
  2. Alagueva V.P. (2006). The golden book on Buryats. Ulan-Udje, pp. 35–37. (inRuss.)
  3. Albarracin, D., & Shavitt, S. (2018). Attitudes and Attitude Change. Annual review of psychology, 69, 299-327. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011911
  4. Bhugra, D., & De Silva, P. (2000). Couple therapy across cultures. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 15 (2), 183–192. doi: 10.1080/14681990050010763
  5. Bin-Tahir, S., Bugis, R., & Tasiana, R. (2017). Intercultural Communication Of A Multicultural Family In Buru Regency. Lingual: Journal Of Language And Culture, 4 (2), 8. doi: 10.24843/LJLC.2017.v04.i02.p02
  6. Bokova T.L. (2007). Main tendencies in the development of multiethnic family in Russian society. Bulletin of Tomsk polytechnic university. [Izvestija Tomskogo politehnicheskogo universiteta], 7 (11), 101–114. (inRuss.)
  7. Bramlett, Matthew & Mosher, William. (2002). Cohabitation, Marriage, Divorce, and Remarriage in the United States. Vital and health statistics. Series 23, Data from the National Survey of Family Growth. 23. 1–93
  8. Buss, D.M. & Schmitt, D.P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: A contextual evolutionary analysis of human mating. Psychological Review, 100:204–32. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.100.2.204
  9. Campbell, Kelly & Silva, Luciana & Wright, David. (2012). Intercultural Relationships: Entry, Adjustment, and Cultural Negotiations. Journal of Comparative Family Studies. 43. 857–870. doi: 10.2307/41756274
  10. Centers, R. (1975). Sexual attraction and love: An instrumental theory. Springfield, IL: C.C. Thomas
  11. Chang, H.-C. (2016). Marital Power Dynamics and Well-Being of Marriage Migrants. Journal of Family Issues, 37 (14), 1994–2020. doi: 10.1177/0192513X15570317
  12. Chebotareva, E.Y., & Volk, M.I. (2020). Life and Family Values Similarity in Inter-Ethnic and Inter-Faith Couples. Behavioral Sciences(2076-328X), 10 (1), 38. doi: 10.3390/bs10010038
  13. Dugarova T.C. (2010). Peculiarities of ethnic identity of modern Russian Buryats. Summary of DrHabil in Psychology. Moscow, MPGU, 45 p. (inRuss.)
  14. Dyrheeva G.A. (2018). Language situation in the Republic of Buryatia. The World of Greater Altai. [Mir Bol'shogo Altaja], 4 (2), 302–320. doi: 10.31551/2410-2725-2018-4-2-302-320. (inRuss.)
  15. Federal State Statictics Service. Results of the 2010 All-Russian census with respect to demographic and social-economic characteristics of particular ethnic groups. Moscow: IIC “Statistika Rossii”. (inRuss.)
  16. Fletcher, Courtney & Nakazawa, Masato & Chen, Yea-Wen & Oetzel, John & Ting-Toomey, Stella & Chang, Shau-Ju & Zhang, Qin. (2014). Establishing Cross-Cultural Measurement Equivalence of Scales Associated with Face-Negotiation Theory: A Critical Issue in Cross-Cultural Comparisons. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 7, 148–169. doi: 10.1080/17513057.2014.898364
  17. Fu, X.(2006). Impact of socioeconomic status on inter-racial mate selection and divorce,The Social Science Journal, 43:2, 239–258, doi: 10.1016/j.soscij.2006.02.004
  18. Fu, X., Tora, J., & Kendall, H. (2001). Marital happiness and inter-racial marriage: A study in a multi-ethnic community in Hawaii. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 32 (1), 47. doi: 10.3138/jcfs.32.1.47
  19. Galchenko, Irina & Van de Vijver, Fons. (2007). The role of perceived cultural distance in the acculturation of exchange students in Russia. International Journal of Intercultural Relations.31, 181–197. doi: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2006.03.004
  20. Galjapina V.N. (2002). Influence of ethnic differences between wife and husband on dissatisfaction with marriage relationship. PhD dissertation in Psychology. Moscow, 230 p.(inRuss.)
  21. Gaspar, S., Ferreira, A. C., & Ramos, M. (2017). European bi-national marriages in Portugal and EU social integration. Portuguese Journal of Social Science, 16 (3), 393–410. doi: 10.1386/pjss.16.3.393_1
  22. Gorenburg, D. (2006). Rethinking Interethnic Marriage in the Soviet Union. Post-Soviet Affairs, 22:2, 145–165. doi: 10.2747/1060-586X.22.2.145
  23. Gricenko V.V. (1991). Social-psychological climate surrounding multiethnic families. Ethnical factors in the life of society. [Jetnicheskie faktory v zhizni obshhestva], Moscow: Institut jetnologii i antropologii AN SSSR, pp. 53–62. (inRuss.)
  24. Hamayon, R.N. (1998). Shamanism, Buddhism and epic heroism: Which supports the identity of the post‐Soviet Buryats? Central Asian Survey, 17:1, 51–67, doi: 10.1080/02634939808401023
  25. Hayford, S.R., Guzzo, K.B., & Smock, P.T. (2014). The decoupling of marriage and parenthood? Trends in the timing of marital first births, 1945–2002.Family Relation, 76 (3), 520–538. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12114
  26. Heikkilä, E., & Rauhut, D. (Eds.) (2015). Marriage Migration and Multicultural Relationships. Institute of Migration, Migration Studies C 25. Turku: Siirtolaisuusinstituuti
  27. Henrich, Joseph & Boyd, Robert & Richerson, Peter. (2012). The Puzzle of Mmonogamous Marriage. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 367, 657–69. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0290
  28. Holland, E.C. (2014). Religious practice and belief in the Republic of Buryatia: comparing across faiths and national groups. Nationalities Papers, 42:1, 165–180, doi: 10.1080/00905992.2013.853032
  29. Il'in E.P. (2012). Psychology of adultness: handbook. Saint Petersburg: Piter, 544 p. ISBN 978-5-459-00762-6 (inRuss.)
  30. Kroeger, R.A., & Williams, K. (2007). Interracial relationships and psychological well-being among young adults in contemporary society. Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association
  31. Maharova G.S. (2003). Mixed-ethnicity marriages in the Republic of Buryatia nowadays. Summary of PhD dissertation in History. Ulan-Udje: BGU. (inRuss.)
  32. Markus, H.R., & Kitayama, S. (1998). The cultural psychology of personality. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29 (1), 63–87. doi: 10.1177/0022022198291004
  33. Matysiak, A., Styrc, M. & Vignoli, D. (2012). The educational gradient in marital disruption: A meta-analysis of European research findings. Population Studies, 68 (2), 197–215. doi: 10.1080/00324728.2013.856459
  34. McDoom, O.S. (2019). Ethnic inequality, cultural distance, and social integration: evidence from a native-settler conflict in the Philippines. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 45:9, 1532–1552. doi: 10.1080/1369183X.2018.1427566
  35. Mcfadden, J., & Moore, J.L. (2001). Intercultural marriage and intimacy: Beyond the continental divide. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling23261–268. doi: 10.1023/A:1014420107362
  36. Novara, C., Serio, C., Lavanco, G., Schirinzi, M. and Moscato, G. (2020). Identity, Couple and Intergroup Dynamics in Intercultural Families: Implications on Life Satisfaction of Partners. Fam. Proc., 59: 709–724. doi: 10.1111/famp.12437
  37. Puohiniemi, M., & Verkasalo, M. (2020). Zeitgeist Effects, Fragmentation of Media Use, and Value Consensus. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 8 (1), 300–332. doi: 10.5964/jspp.v8i1.1117
  38. Quisumbing, A.R., & Hallman, K. (2003). Marriage in transition: Evidence on age, education, and assets from six developing countries. New York: Population Council, Policy Research Division Working Papers No. 183.doi: 10.31899/pgy6.1089
  39. Rahnu, Leen & Puur, Allan & Kleinepier, Tom & Tammaru, Tiit. (2020). The Role of Neighbourhood and Workplace Ethnic Contexts in the Formation of Inter-ethnic Partnerships: A Native Majority Perspective. European Journal of Population. 36. doi: 10.1007/s10680-019-09528-x
  40. Rezadost, K., & Mombeni, I. (2011). The relationship between late marriage, income, the level of education, and other factors in employed women.Journal of Applied Counseling, 1 (1), 105–122
  41. Roof, W.C. (1998). “Religious Borderlands: Challenges for Future Study.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 37 (1): 1–14. doi: 10.2307/1388025
  42. Sikevich Z.V., Possel' Ju.A. (2019). Structure and typology of ethnic identities in members of single-ethnic and multiethnic families (comparative analysis). Journal of Sociology.[Sociologicheskij zhurnal], 25 (1), 121–136. doi: 10.19181/socjour.2018.25.1.6282. (inRuss.)
  43. Skowronski, Dariusz & Cherie, Toh & Fernandez, Tricia & Danx, Daniel & Wan, Michelle & Waszyńska, Katarzyna. (2014). Introductory Analysis of Factors Affecting Intercultural Couples in the Context of Singapore. Educational Studies. 263–268. doi: 10.14746/se.2014.30.15
  44. Sobolevskaja O.V. Multiethnic maggiages measure distance between ethnic communities [Electronic resourse] // National Research University Higher School of Economics: [site]: URL: https://iq.hse.ru/news/177665069.html — (accessed 02.05.2020). (inRuss.)
  45. Stepanova A.A. (2016). Ethnic identity and language identity in Buryat-speaking people: social and psycholinguistic studies. Issues of psycholinguistics. [Voprosy psiholingvistiki],4 (30), 206–215.(inRuss.)
  46. TashhevaA.I., GridnevaS.V., StefanenkoT.G., TihomandrickajaO.A. (2016). Mixed-ethnicity marriages through the lens of satisfaction with marriage. Russian psychological journal. [Rossijskij psihologicheskij zhurnal], 3, 39–52. doi: 10.21702/rpj.2016.3.3 (inRuss.)
  47. Trifonova A.T. (2014). Modern multicultural families: value orientation. Ulan-Udje: Burjatskij gosuniversitet, 128 p. (inRuss.)
  48. Troy, A.B., Lewis-Smith, J., & Laurenceau, J.-P. (2006). Interracial and intraracial romantic relationships: The search for differences in satisfaction, conflict, and attachment style. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 23 (1), 65–80. doi: 10.1177/0265407506060178
  49. Vrublevskaja O.V. (2017). Language trends in Russian onomastics. Volgograd: Peremena, 329 p.(inRuss.)
  50. Walker RS, Hill KR, Flinn MV, Ellsworth RM (2011). Evolutionary History of Hunter-Gatherer Marriage Practices. PLoS ONE, 6 (4): e19066. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019066
  51. Yang, W.S., & Yen, P.C. (2014). Single and happier? A comparative study of marital status, socioeconomic security and wellbeing of women in Hong Kong and Taiwan. The Springer Series on Demographic Methods and Population Analysis, 35, 81–97. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-7445-2_5
  52. Zhukovskaya, N.L. (1992). Buddhism and problems of national and cultural resurrection of the Buryat nation, Central Asian Survey, 11:2, 27–41, doi: 10.1080/02634939208400770

For citing this article:

Alaguev M.V. (2021). Entry into intercultural marriage: factors of spouse choice. National Psychological Journal, [Natsional’nyy psikhologicheskiy zhurnal], 2021, (41)1, 63-75. doi: 10.11621/npj.2021.0106

About Editorial Board Volumes Authors For Authors Indexing Contacts
CC BY-NC

National Psychological Journal, 2006 - 2022