ISSN 2079-6617 (Print)
ISSN 2309-9828 (Online)
Ru | En
Russian Psychological Society
The Faculty of Psychology. Lomonosov Moscow State University.
Main RSS Search

MainArticlesVolumes

Grigoryev D.S. (2020). From patriotism to political totalitarianism: the role of collective narcissism. National Psychological Journal, [Natsional’nyy psikhologicheskiy zhurnal], (40) 4, 48–60. doi: 10.11621/npj.2020.0404

Abstract

Background. Patriotic education is carried out in many countries, being an integral part of the process of socialization of the younger generation. At the same time, patriotism is often used by autocracies to maintain power and total state control over all aspects of public and private life. What is the socio-psychological aspect of this possible transformation?

Objective. The aim of the study was to test the model of the relationship between patriotism, nationalism, right-wing authoritarianism and political totalitarianism, as well as to examine the role of collective narcissism in these relationships. We hypothesized that patriotism is not directly related to totalitarianism, this connection is mediated by nationalism and right-wing authoritarianism, while patriotism and nationalism are connected only under the condition of a high level of collective narcissism (i.e., collective narcissism demonstrates the effect of moderation).

Design. The study of the role of collective narcissism in the relationship between patriotism, nationalism, right-wing authoritarianism and political totalitarianism was carried out in 2018 on a gender-balanced sample of residents of Russia (N –232) aged 16 to 61 (M –28.5; SD –10.2). Reliable and valid tools were used for measurements: cultural patriotism and nationalism (Grigoryan 2013; Grigoryan, Lepshokova, 2012), collective narcissism (Golec de Zavala et al., 2009), right-wing authoritarianism (Bizumic, Duckitt, 2018). A cross-sectional single-sample correlation design was applied using data from a socio-psychological survey. The data was collected in 2018 through an online survey conducted by an independent commercial research company as a result of a survey of their own panel of respondents.

The survey was conducted using various Likert scales. All scales that had not previously been translated into Russian were adapted by double translation and cognitive interviews using the “think-aloud” technique (Batkhina, Grigoryev, 2019).

Results. The hypotheses that were put forward were confirmed. It was found that (1) patriotism is not directly related to totalitarianism: nationalism and authoritarianism mediated the relationship between patriotism and totalitarianism, and nationalism mediated the relationship between patriotism and authoritarianism; (2) patriotism is positively associated with nationalism only if the level of collective narcissism is high; (3) nationalism is positively associated with authoritarianism and totalitarianism, and authoritarianism with totalitarianism.

Conclusions. Collective narcissism may reflect the process of compensating for low self-esteem and lack of control over their lives in people, and generate belief in an exalted image of the in-group and its right to special recognition. Subsequently, this helps to use patriotism as a basis for supporting political totalitarianism. Nationalism and authoritarianism can carry an instrumental function in this process acting as certain strategies for the implementation of the motivational orientation set by collective narcissism.

Received: 09/15/2020
Accepted: 10/09/2020
Pages: 48-60
DOI: 10.11621/npj.2020.0404

Sections: Social Psychology;

PDF:

Keywords: political totalitarianism; patriotism; collective narcissism; nationalism; right-wing authoritarianism; political ideology; socio-functional approach

Available Online 30.10.2020

  1. Altemeyer B. (1996). The Authoritarian Specter.Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press, 374 p.

  2. Angraini Y., Toharudin T., Folmer H., & Oud J.H.L. (2014). The relationships between individualism, nationalism, ethnocentrism, and authoritarianism in Flanders: A continuous time-structural equation modeling approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research,49 (1), 41–53. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2013.836621

  3. Batkhina A. (2020). Values and communication apprehension as antecedents of conflict styles in intercultural conflicts: A study in Germany and Russia. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 26 (1), 22–34. doi: 10.1037/pac0000429

  4. Batkhina A., & Grigoryev D. (2019). Authoritarianism in modern Russia. In Poster session presented at the Fifth Annual American Political Science Association Political Psychology Conference, Georgetown University, Washington, DC. 

  5. Bizumic B., & Duckitt J. (2018). Investigating right-wing authoritarianism with a very short authoritarianism scale. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 6 (1), 129–150. doi: 10.5964/jspp.v6i1.835 

  6. Cichocka A., & Cislak A. (2020). Nationalism as collective narcissism. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences,34,69–74. doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2019.12.013

  7. Costa M.V. (2020). Education for civic virtue or patriotism? Journal of Social Philosophy, (in press). doi: 10.1111/josp.12364

  8. Duckitt J., & Sibley C.G. (2010). Personality, ideology, prejudice, and politics: A Dual-Process Motivational Model. Journal of Personality, 78 (6), 1861–1894.doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00672.x

  9. Duriez B., van Hiel A., & Kossowska M. (2005). Authoritarianism and social dominance in Western and Eastern Europe: The importance of the sociopolitical context and of political interest and involvement. Political Psychology, 26 (2), 299–320. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2005.00419.x

  10. European Social Survey (ESS). (2016). ESS 1-7, European Social Survey cumulative file, study description.Bergen, Norwey: NSD – Norwegian Centre for Research Data for ESS ERIC. 

  11. Fornell C., & Lacker D. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (1), 39–50.doi:10.1177/002224378101800104

  12. Golec de Zavala A., & Lantos D. (2020). Collective narcissism and its social consequences: The bad and the ugly. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 29 (3), 273–278. doi: 10.1177/0963721420917703

  13. Golec de Zavala A., Cichocka A., Eidelson R., & Jayawickreme N. (2009). Collective narcissism and its social consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97 (6), 1074–1096. doi: 10.1037/a0016904

  14. Golec de Zavala A., Dyduch-Hazar K., & Lantos D. (2019). Collective narcissism: Political consequences of investing self-worth in the ingroup’s image. Political Psychology, 40 (S1), 37–74. doi: 10.1111/pops.12569

  15. Golec de Zavala A., Federico C.M., Sedikides C., Guerra R., Lantos D., Mroziński B., … & Baran T. (2020). Low self-esteem predicts out-group derogation via collective narcissism, but this relationship is obscured by in-group satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,119 (3), 741–764. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000260

  16. Grigoryan L.K. (2013). Patriotism and nationalism in Russia: Influence on economic independence. Kul'turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya – Cultural-Historical Psychology, 9 (3), 22–31. (In Russ.).

  17. Grigoryan L.K., & Lepshokova Z.K. (2012). The role of national identity and attitudes towards immigrants in economic beliefs of Russians: An empirical model. Sotsial'naya psikhologiya i obshchestvo – Social Psychology and Society, 3 (2), 5–20. (In Russ.).

  18. Grigoryan L.K., & Ponizovskiy V. (2018). The three facets of national identity: Identity dynamics and attitudes toward immigrants in Russia.International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 59 (5–6), 403–427. doi: 10.1177/0020715218806037

  19. Grigoryev D., Batkhina A., van de Vijver F., & Berry J.W. (2020). Towards an integration of models of discrimination of immigrants: From ultimate (functional) to proximate (sociofunctional) explanations. Journal of International Migration and Integration,21 (3), 667–691. doi: 10.1007/s12134-019-00677-w 

  20. Hanson K., & O’Dwyer E. (2018). Patriotism and nationalism, left and right: A Q-methodology study of American national identity. Political Psychology, 40 (4), 777–795. doi: 10.1111/pops.12561

  21. Hayes A.F. (2018). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press. 692. p.

  22. Iliassov F.N. (2018). Electoral behavior in authoritarian and democratic society. Sotsial'nye issledovaniya – Social studies, 1, 1–23. 

  23. Jost J.T., Federico C.M., & Napier J.L. (2009). Political ideology: Its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annual Review of Psychology,60 (1), 307–337. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163600

  24. Jost J.T., Langer M., Badaan V., Azevedo F., Etchezahar E., Ungaretti J., & Hennes E.P. (2017). Ideology and the limits of self-interest: System justification motivation and conservative advantages in mass politics. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 3 (3), 1–26. doi: 10.1037/tps0000127

  25. Khukhlaev O.E. (2012). Psychology of nationalism in foreign research. Sotsial'naya psikhologiya i obshchestvo – Social Psychology and Society, 3 (4), 15–29. (In Russ.).

  26. Kunst J.R., & Obaidi M. (2020). Understanding violent extremism in the 21st century: The (re)emerging role of relative deprivation. Current Opinion in Psychology, 35, 55–59. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.03.010

  27. Mashuri A., Akhrani L.A., & Zaduqisti E. (2016). You are the real terrorist and we are just your puppet: Using individual and group factors to explain Indonesian Muslims’ attributions of causes of terrorism. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 12 (1), 68–98. doi: 10.5964/ejop.v12i1.1001

  28. Osborne D., Milojev P., & Sibley C.G. (2017). Authoritarianism and national identity: Examining the longitudinal effects of SDO and RWA on nationalism and patriotism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,43 (8), 1086–1099. doi: 10.1177/0146167217704196

  29. Salfate S.V., & Ayala R.M. (2020). Nationalism, patriotism, and legitimation of the national social systems. Revista de Psicología, 38 (2), 423–450. doi: 10.18800/psico.202002.003

  30. Satherley N., Yogeeswaran K., Osborne D., & Sibley C.G. (2019). Differentiating between pure patriots and nationalistic patriots: A model of national attachment profiles and their socio-political attitudes. InternationalJournal of Intercultural Relations, 72,13–24. doi: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2019.06.005

  31. Šram Z., & Dulić J. (2015). National threat perception, dominance-submissive authoritarian syndrome and totalitarian socialist ideology. The International Journal of Humanities and Social Science,5 (9–1), 37–51.

  32. Wolak J., & Dawkins R. (2016). The roots of patriotism across political contexts. Political Psychology, 38 (3), 391–408. doi: 10.1111/pops.12363

For citing this article:

Grigoryev D.S. (2020). From patriotism to political totalitarianism: the role of collective narcissism. National Psychological Journal, [Natsional’nyy psikhologicheskiy zhurnal], (40) 4, 48–60. doi: 10.11621/npj.2020.0404

About Editorial Board Volumes Authors For Authors Indexing Contacts
CC BY-NC

National Psychological Journal, 2006 - 2022