Background. The article develops the concept of the originality of the functions, structure and genesis of empathy-identification (EI) and empathy-modeling (EM). EI is viewed as a psychological tool for organizing joint activities such as a mono-role coalition, which has developed in anthropogenesis, and consists in the ability to appropriate the emotional states of another person. In contrast, EM is a cultural technology for maintaining joint activity such as poly-role coordination, which requires the subject of activity to create and maintain in consciousness a dynamic representation of the mental state of another person while maintaining the authenticity of awareness of his own mental state. A consequence of the conceptual separation of EO and EM is the provision of two non-matching lines of their development in ontogenesis.
Objective. The aim of the article is to explicate the qualitative uniqueness of EI and EM as higher mental functions in relation to the social situation of their development and the arsenal of ideal forms, cultural means and technologies that set the content and trajectory of this development.
Design. From the standpoint of cultural-evolutionary and activity-based approaches, a conceptual analysis of literature relevant to the connotative field of the proposed constructs of EI (affective empathy, emotional contamination, emotional mimicry, imitation) and EM (theory of the mental, everyday psychology, mentalization, emotional intelligence) as well as the analysis of EI and EM constructs from the point of view of cultural determination of their development in ontogenesis was performed.
Results. It has been substantiated that EI is formed in the process of dyadic joint experience with an adult of various mental states, which an adult presents first in a visual way, and then verbally. Further development of EI takes place in play activities that include imagination. EI rarely reaches the level of complete voluntary regulation and needs to rely on external cultural means. EM is derived from the dialogical nature of human thinking. In ontogeny, EM is formed along two converging lines. On the one hand, mastering the mental vocabulary serves as the basis of “emotional literacy”, and, on the other hand, EM is the result of the interiorizationof a specific social and communicative position –the autonomization of an adult as a mental agent in the third person. The role-playing game with the subjective “animation” of the toy is of particular importance for the development of EM. At an older age, various forms of dramatization, in particular theatrical activity, act as cultural practices for the development of EM.
Conclusions. The results of the work showed that EI and EM have different sources, driving forces, ideal forms and socio-cultural technologies of formation. The originality of the lines of cultural determination of the development of EI and EM is associated with the difference in their functional role in organizing joint activities.
(2016). The main educational program of preschool education “Paths”, ed.V.T.Kudryavtsev. Moscow, Ventana-Graf, 592 p.
Asmolov A.G., Shekhter E.D., Chernorizov A.M. (2017). Pre-adaptation to uncertainty as a navigation strategy for developing systems: routes of evolution. [Voprosy psikhologii], (4) 3–26.
Berezhkovskaya E.L.Radinskaya N.G.(2006). Cultural-historical and humanistic psychology: possible convergence points (empathy as the highest mental function). VestnikRGGU, 1,126–145.
Berezovskaya T.P.(2004). Emotional development of high school students in a general education school with a theatrical specialization. [Рsihologicheskij zhurnal], 2004, 3 (3), 30–35.
Bovina I.B.(2020). Study of Empathy: Critical Analysis and New Perspectives. Cultural-Historical Psychology[Kul’turno-Istoricheskaya Psychologiya], 16 (1), 88–95.doi: 10.17759/chp.2020160109
Chapman, M. (1991). The epistemic triangle: Operative and communicative components of cognitive development. In M. Chandler, & M. Chapman (Eds.). Criteria for competence: Controversies in the conceptualization and assessment of children’s abilities(209–228). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Clark, A and Chalmers, D. (1998). ‘The Extended Mind’. Analysis, 58 (1), 7–19. doi: 10.1093/analys/58.1.7
Clark, A. (2009). Spreading the joy? Why the machinery of consciousness is (probably) still in the head. Mind, 118, 963–93.doi: 10.1093/mind/fzp110
Coplan, A. (2011). Understanding Empathy: Its Features and Effects. In Coplan A, Goldie P: Empathy. Philosophical and Psychological Perspectives. Oxford University Press, New York, 3–18. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199539956.003.0002
Cuff, B., Brown, S.J, Taylor, L., Howat, D. (2014). Empathy: a review of the concept. Emotion review, 7, 1–10.
Davis, M. (2004). Empathy. In Tiedens L., Leach C. (Eds.). The Social Life of Emotions (Studies in Emotion and Social Interaction). Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 19–42. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511819568.003
Davis, P.E., Meins, E., & Fernyhough, C. (2011). Self-knowledge in childhood: Relations with children’s imaginary companions and understanding of mind. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 29 (3), 680–686. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-835X.2011.02038.x
de Klerk, C.C., Johnson, M.H., Heyes, C.M., & Southgate, V. (2015). Baby steps: Investigating the development of perceptual-motor couplings in infancy. Developmental Science,18 (2), 270–280. doi: 10.1111/desc.12226
de Klerk, C.C., Lamy-Yang, I. and Southgate, V., (2019). The role of sensorimotor experience in the development of mimicry in infancy. Developmental Science. 22 (3), e12771.doi: 10.1111/desc.12771
Donald, M. (1991). Origins of the modern mind: Three stages in the evolution of culture and cognition. Harvard University Press.
Elkonin D.B. (1978).On the historical origin of role-playing games.Moscow,Pedagogika, 304 p.
Fernyhough, C. (2008). Getting Vygotskian about theory of mind: Mediation, dialogue, and the development of social understanding. Developmental review, 28 (2), 225–262.doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2007.03.001
Fernyhough, C., & Meins, E. (2009). Private speech and theory of mind: Evidence for developing interfunctional relations. In A. Winsler, C. Fernyhough, & I. Montero (Eds.), Private speech, executive functioning, and the development of verbal self regulation.New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 95–104. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511581533.008
Finlay, L. (2005). “Reflexive embodied empathy”: A phenomenology of participant-researcher intersubjectivity.The Humanistic Psychologist,33 (4), 271–292. doi: 10.1207/s15473333thp3304_4
GavrilovaT.P. (1975). Theconceptofempathyinforeignpsychology. [Voprosy psikhologii],2, 147–158.
Giudice, M.D., Manera, V., Keysers, C. (2009). Programmed to learn? The ontogeny of mirror neurons. Developmental Science, 12, 350–363. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00783.x
Goldman, A. & Vignemont, F.D. (2009). Is social cognition embodied? Trends Cognitive Science, 13, 154–159. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2009.01.007
Goldman, A.I. (2011). Two routes to empathy: Insights from cognitive neuroscience. In Coplan A, Goldie P: Empathy. Philosophical and Psychological Perspectives. Oxford University Press, New York.
Harris, P.L. (1992). From simulation to folk psychology: the case for development. Mind & Language. 7 (1–2), 120–144.doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0017.1992.tb00201.x
Heyes C. (2018). Cognitive Gadgets: The cultural evolution of thinking. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard Univ. Press. doi: 0.4159/9780674985155
Heyes, C. (2016). Homo imitans? Seven reasons why imitation couldn't possibly be associative. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 371 (1686), 20150069. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0069
Heyes, C. (2018). Empathy is not in our genes. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 95, 499–507. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.11.001
Hoffman, M.L. (2000). Empathy and moral development: Implications for caring and justice. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511805851
Kanske P., Bockler A., Trautwein F.-M. et al. (2016). Are strong empathizers better mentalizers? Evidence for independence and interaction between the routes of social cognition.Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 11 (9), 1–10. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsw052
Karyagina T.D. (2010). The problem of the formation of empathy. [Konsultativnaya psychologiya i psychoterapiya], 1, 38–54.
Karyagina T.D.(2013). Evolution of the concept of “empathy” in psychology: thesis for psychol.PHD. Moscow City Psychological and Pedagogical University[Moscovskii Gorodskoi Psychologo-Pedagogicheskii Universitet].
Kavanaugh, R.D. (2006). Pretend Play and Theory of Mind. In L. Balter & C. S. Tamis-LeMonda (Eds.),Child psychology: A handbook of contemporary issues, 153–166. Psychology Press.
Keysers, C., & Gazzola, V. (2014). Hebbian learning and predictive mirror neurons for actions, sensations and emotions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences,369 (1644), 20130175. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0175
Kholmogorova A.B.(2015). The role of L.S.Vygotsky ideas for the formation of the paradigm of social cognition in modern psychology: a review of foreign research and discussion of prospects. Cultural-Historical Psychology[Kul’turno-Istoricheskaya Psychologiya], 1 (3), 25–43.doi: 10.17759/chp.2015110304
Kholmogorova A.B. (2016).The value of the L.S.Vygotsky cultural-historical theory of the development of the psyche for the development of modern models of social cognition and methods of psychotherapy. Cultural-Historical Psychology[Kul’turno-Istoricheskaya Psychologiya], 12 (3), 58–92.doi: 10.17759/chp.2016120305
Klimenkova E.N.(2016). The development of mentalization and empathy in ontogenesis: a review of empirical research. Consultative psychology and psychotherapy[Konsultativnaya psychologiya i psychoterapiya],24 (4),126–137.doi: 10.17759 / cpp20162404006
Kohler, E., Keysers, C., Umilta, M. A., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., & Rizzolatti, G. (2002). Hearing sounds, understanding actions: action representation in mirror neurons. Science, 297 (5582), 846–848. doi: 10.1126/science.1070311
Kondrashova N.V., Turbaeva A.A. (2014). Development of empathy in older preschool children through fairy tales. [Concept], 3,1–5.
Krasavtseva Yu.V., Kornilova T.V. (2018). Emotional and academic intelligence as predictors of strategies in the Iowa game problem (igt). [PsychologicheskiZhurnal], 39 (3), 29–43.
Kudryavtsev V.T., Fattakhova D.I. (2015). A child on the threshold of pupillage: imagination as a condition for the development of communication among older preschoolers. [VestnikRGGU], Series “Psychology.Pedagogy.Education”, 2,87–97.
Leontiev A.N.(1981). Mental development problems.Moscow, Publishing house of Moscow State University. 584 p.
Liebal, K., Behne, T., Carpenter, M., & Tomasello, M. (2009). Infants use shared experience to interpret pointing gestures. Developmental science, 12 (2), 264–271. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00758.x
McFarland, D.C., Malone, A.K., Roth, А. (2017). Acute empathy decline among resident physician trainees on a hematology-oncology ward: an exploratory analysis of house staff empathy, distress, and patient death exposure. Psychooncology, 2, 698–703. doi: 10.1002/pon.4069
Meins, E., Fernyhough, C., Wainwright, R., Clark‐Carter, D., Das Gupta, M., Fradley, E., & Tuckey, M. (2003). Pathways to understanding mind: Construct validity and predictive validity of maternal mind‐mindedness. Child development, 74 (4), 1194–1211.doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00601
Nakahashi, W. & Ohtsuki, H. (2015). When is emotional contagion adaptive? Journal of Theoretical Biology, 380, 480–488. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2015.06.014
Nelson, K. (2005). Language pathways into the community of minds. In J. W. Astington & J.A. Baird (Eds.), Why language matters for theory of mind, 26–49. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195159912.003.0002
Nurkova V.V. (2019). The evolutionary turn of cultural-historical psychology and the theory of cognitive gadgets: analogs or homologues? [Voprosypsychologii], 4, 29–40.
Nurkova V.V.(2020). Empathy-identification and empathy-modeling: on the cultural construction of two modes of joint activity. [Voprosypsychologii], 3, 313.
Petrovsky V.A.(2011). Activity-based mediation of interpersonal relations: phenomena, essence. Social psychology and society [Sotsial’naya psychologiya i obshestvo],2 (1), 5–16.
Ponomarev I.V. (2013). Research of private (egocentric) speech in children with typical development.Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology, 3, 71–80.
Preston, S.D. & de Waal, F.B.M. (2002). Empathy: Its ultimate and proximate bases. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25, 1–20. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X02000018
Rizzolatti, G. (2005). The mirror neuron system and its function in humans. Anatomy and embryology, 210 (5–6), 419–421. doi: 10.1007/s00429-005-0039-z
Ruffman, T., Slade, L., & Crowe, E. (2002). The Relation between Children’s and Mothers? Mental State Language and Theory-of-Mind Understanding. Child Development, 73 (3), 734–751. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00435
Searle J.R. (1990). Collective intentions and actions. In: Cohen PR, Morgan J, Pollack M (eds), Intentions in Communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 401–415.
Simner, M.L. (1971). Newborn's response to the cry of another infant. Developmental Psychology, 5 (1), 136–150.doi: 10.1037/h0031066
Singer, T., & Steinbeis, N. (2009). Differential roles of fairness- and compassion-based motivations for cooperation, defection, and punishment. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1167, 41–50. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04733.x
Sloman, R., Rosen, G., Rom, M., & Shir, Y. (2005). Nurses’ assessment of pain in surgical patients. Journal of advanced nursing, 52 (2), 125–132. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03573.x
Smirnova E.O., Kholmogorova V.M.(2005). Interpersonal relations of preschoolers: diagnostics, problems, correction. Moscow, Humanitarian.ed.center VLADOS, 158 p.
Southgate, V., Senju, A., & Csibra, G. (2007). Action anticipation through attribution of false belief by 2-year-olds. Psychological science, 18 (7), 587–592. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01944.x
Taylor, M., & Carlson, S.M. (1997). The relation between individual differences in fantasy and theory of mind. Child development, 68 (3), 436–455.doi: 10.2307/1131670
Tomasello M. (2011). Origins of human communication.Moscow, Languages of Slavic Cultures, 323 p.
Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., Call, J., Behne, T., & Moll, H. (2005). Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 675–691. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X05000129
Tomasello, M., Kruger, A.C., & Ratner, H.H. (1993). Cultural learning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16, 495–552. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X0003123X
Vaish, A., Carpenter, M., & Tomasello, M. (2009). Sympathy through affective perspective taking and its relation to prosocial behavior in toddlers. Developmental psychology, 45 (2), 534. doi: 10.1037/a0014322
Veresov, N. (2014). Method, methodology and methodological thinking. In M. Fleer & A. Ridgway (Eds.). Visual Methodologies and Digital Tools for Researching with Young Children. Springer, 215–228.doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-01469-2_12
Vygotsky L.S.(1983). Collected works: in 6 volumes (Ch.ed.A.V. Zaporozhets),V. 3: Problems of the development of the psyche (ed.A.M. Matyushkin). Moscow: Pedagogika, 369 p.
Wispé, L. (1986). The distinction between sympathy and empathy: To call forth a concept, a word is needed. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50 (2), 314–321. doi: 10.1037/0022-3518.104.22.1684
Youngblade, L.M., & Dunn, J. (1995). Individual differences in young children's pretend play with mother and sibling: Links to relationships and understanding of other people's feelings and beliefs. Child Development, 66 (5), 1472–1492. doi: 10.2307/1131658
Nourkova V.V. (2020). Cultural development of Empathy-identication and Empathy-modeling. National Psychological Journal, [Natsional’nyy psikhologicheskiy zhurnal], 13(3), 3–17. doi: 10.11621/npj.2020.0401