ISSN 2079-6617 (Print)
ISSN 2309-9828 (Online)
Ru | En
Russian Psychological Society
The Faculty of Psychology. Lomonosov Moscow State University.
Main RSS Search

MainArticlesVolumes

Dmitriy A. Khoroshilov, Ekaterina A. Hilger. Paramonova, Tatyana I. Aliyeva, Inna A. Volodarskaya. (2019). Collective experience of precarity and civil movements. National Psychological Journal. 2, 48-54.

Abstract

Background. Thestudy explores the potential predictors of the collective action in the context of contemporary social and civil movements. Classical socio-psychological models of social movements focus on the concept of social identity, i.e. collective identity and have difficulty explaining a sudden upsurge of popular demonstrations in the world (from mass demonstrations in Russia till “Yellow vests” movement in France). 

Objective. The research aims to identify a latent criterion of the identification with the protest movement which can be situated within the social space only at the moment of people assemblies. 

Design. According to the literature review, the authors suggest that the collective experience of precariousness, representing the people’s vulnerability in existing social and political order can be a latent identification criterion of social and civil movements. In the research, we subjected the data of semi-structured interviews with the activists of Russian civil movements to the Jonathan A. Smith's method of interpretative phenomenological analysis. 

Findings. As a result of the qualitative analysis of the interviews, the main features that manifest the collective experience of precariousness were identified. The collective experience is performed through the views of the civil movements activists in Russia in the 2010s: 1) Participation in demonstrations s identified with the particular state; 2) Experience of injustice as stepping out the comfort zone; 3) Intention to change social order; 4) Handling the fear of punishment; 5) Deception and lost illusions. 

Conclusion. Precarity becomes a predictor of collective action only in the case if it becomes a collective experience of a community, a formal assigning to the precariat class is not enough for collective mobilization. The understanding of how the collective experience of precariousness is identified with new social movements uncovers perspectives for further research.

Received: 03/04/2019
Accepted: 04/16/2019
Pages: 48-54
DOI: 10.11621/ npj.2019.0209

By: ; Hilger, Ekaterina A.;

Sections: Social Psychology;

PDF: /pdf/npj-no34-2019/npj_no34_2019_048-054.pdf

Keywords: civil movement; collective behaviour; social identity; collective experience; precarity;

Available Online 30.01.2019

References

  1. Agadullina E.R. (2013). Collective actions: predictors and models. Social psychology and society, 3, 42–51.
  2. Andreeva G.M. (20090. Social Psychology. Moscow, Aspekt Press. 
  3. Busygina N.P. (2015). Qualitative and quantitative research methods in psychology. Moscow, Yurayt, 
  4. Guseltseva M.S. (2018). The study of identity in the context of culture: methodology of latent changes. [Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya], 11(58). Retrieved from: http://psystudy.ru/index.php/num/2018v11n58/1547-guseltseva58.html - (appeal date 04.21.2019).
  5. Emelyanova, T.P. (2016). The phenomenon of collective feelings in the psychology of large social groups. Social and economic psychology, 1(1), 3–22.
  6. Stefanenko T.G., & Lipatov S.A. (eds.) (2015). Collective experiences of social problems. Moscow, Smysl.
  7. Levinson A. (2012). Spaces of protest: Moscow meetings and community of citizens. Moscow, Strelka Press. 
  8. Martsinkovskaya T.D. (2016). Culture and subculture in the space of a psychological chronotope. Moscow, Smysl.
  9. Melnikova O.T. (2017). Respondents do not tell the truth? [Rossiyskaya gazeta].162 (7328). Retrieved from: https://rg.ru/2017/07/24/olga-melnikova-massovye-socoprosy-imeiut-svoi-izderzhki.html - (appeal date: 21.04.2019).
  10. Erpylevoi S.V. & Magun A.V. (eds.) (2014). Politics apolitical: civil movements in Russia 2011–2013. Moscow, NLO. 
  11. Krasin Yu.A., Weber A.B., & Galkina A.A. (eds.). (2017). The human reason at the crossroads: public consciousness between the past and the future. Moscow, Aspekt Press.
  12. Toshchenko ZH.T. Prekariat: from protoclass to a new class. Moscow, Science, 2018.
  13. Khoroshilov D.A. (2018). Collective experiences of precarity in modern culture (in the memory of T. Stefanenko) [Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya], 11(58). Retrieved from: http://psystudy.ru/index.php/num/2018v11n58/1548-khoroshilov58.html - (appeal date: 04.21.2019).
  14. Shpet G. (1989). Works. Moscow, Pravda. 
  15. Anderson B. (2006). Imagined Communities. London, New York: Verso.
  16. Agamben G. (1998) Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  17. Butler J. (2015). Notes Toward a Performing Theory of Assembly. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. doi: 10.4159/9780674495548
  18. Kelly C., Breinlinger S. (2012). The Social Psychology of Collective Action: Identity, Injustice and Gender. L., NY: Routledge.
  19. Klandermans, P. G. (2014). Identity Politics and Politicized Identities: Identity Processes and Dynamics of Protest. Political Psychology,  35(1), 1–22. doi:  10.1111/pops.12167
  20. Lyer A., & ​​Leach C.W. (2009). Emotion in Inter-group Relations.  European Review of Social Psychology, 19, 86–125. doi:  10.1080/10463280802079738
  21. Neveu E. (2015). Sociologie des Mouvements Sociaux. Paris: La Découverte. doi: 10.4074/S0336150015012090
  22. Melucci A. (1980). The New Social Movements: A Theoretical Approach. Social Science Information, 19(2), 199–226. doi: 10.1177/053901848001900201
  23. Mouffe, S. (2005). On the Political. London, New York: Routledge.
  24. Smelser N.J. (2011). Theory of Collective Behavior. New Orleans, Louisiana: Quid Pro Books.
  25. Smith J.A., Flowers P., & Larkin M. (2009). Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis Theory, Method and Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  26. Snow, D. & Moss, D. (2014). Protest on the Fly, 79(6), 1122–1143. doi: 10.1177/0003122414554081
  27. Standing G. (2011). The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
  28. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J.C. (1986) The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Chicago, IL: Nelson, 7–24.
  29. Van Zomeren M., Postmes T., & Spears R. (2008). Toward An Integrative Social Identity Model of Collective Action: A Quantitative Research Synthesis of Socio-Psychological Perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 504–535. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.504
  30. Von Scheve C., Salmela M. (Eds). (2014). Collective Emotions: Perspectives from Psychology, Philosophy, and Sociology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199659180.001.0001

For citing this article:

Dmitriy A. Khoroshilov, Ekaterina A. Hilger. Paramonova, Tatyana I. Aliyeva, Inna A. Volodarskaya. (2019). Collective experience of precarity and civil movements. National Psychological Journal. 2, 48-54.

About Editorial Board Volumes Authors For Authors Indexing Contacts
CC BY-NC

National Psychological Journal, 2006 - 2020