ISSN 2079-6617 (Print)
ISSN 2309-9828 (Online)
Ru | En
Russian Psychological Society
The Faculty of Psychology. Lomonosov Moscow State University.
Main RSS Search

MainArticlesVolumes

Svetlana M. Churbanova. (2019). L. F. Obukhova’s ideas to the development of children creativity. National Psychological Journal. 2, 19-24.

Abstract

Background. The paper focuses upon L.F. Obukhova's ideas about creativity in children, the search for objective mechanisms for the development of child thinking in solving creative problems. The paper is prepared in connection with the conference “Scientific Readings in Memory of L.F. Obukhova (1938-2016), Professor of Moscow State Lomonosov University” on the occasion of her 80th birthday.

The Objective of the analytical and theoretical research is rethinking the basic ideas of L.F. Obukhova in the study of key aspects of child creativity and systematic study of thinking based on ‘open-end’ type problems that allow multiple solutions.    

Design. The psychological characteristics of creativity in children and its relationship with other mental processes are consistently considered. The mental processes are perception, emotions, intelligence, imagination; age peaks and declines in the development of creativity of preschoolers. The paper presents a critical analysis of measuring creativity, the impact of learning on the development of children on the basis of popular programs and trainings of creative thinking. The paper highlights the prospects of Obukhova's scientific approach to the vital issues in understanding mental development of the child, the ‘intersection of ideas’ of representatives of cultural-historical and natural-scientific paradigms.

Results. The heuristic possibilities of the analysis of the general and divergences of representatives of two main scientific paradigms in modern psychology are shown. According to L.F. Obukhova, the Torrence's Picture Construction Test shows the convergent strategies of solution, which contradicts Guilford's understanding of the phenomena of creativity. The cultural-historical paradigm highlights the artificial approach to the process of thinking though the prism of multiple factors.

Findings. The analysis showed that underestimating the role of adults in the teaching creativity brings about a partial solution to the problem articulated by E.P. Torrence: «Can we Teach Children To Think Creatively?» Building a comprehensive view of the mechanisms that induce creative processes brings closer to a deeper understanding of the issues of development and learning. 

Received: 04/19/2019
Accepted: 04/24/2019
Pages: 19-24
DOI: 10.11621/npj.2019.0204

By: ;

Sections: Scientific readings in memory of L.F. Obukhova;

PDF: /pdf/npj-no34-2019/npj_no34_2019_019-024.pdf

Keywords: natural-scientific approach; Gilford’s divergence concept; development of creativity; insight; productive decisions; cultural historical concept; child age; Galperin`s method of mental actions development; preschool age; Lyudmila Obukhova;

Available Online 30.01.2019

References:

  1. Burmenskaya G.V. (1978). Opportunities for the systematic development of the preschooler's cognitive processes: Ph.D. in Psychology. Moscow,MGU im. M.V. Lomonosova. 

  2. Cropley, A.J. (1967). Creativity. London: Longmans, Green.

  3. Cropley, A.J. (2000). Defining and measuring creativity: Are creativity tests worth using? Roeper Review,23(2), 72–79. doi: 10.1080/02783190009554069

  4. Churbanova, S.M. (2018). Developing creative thinking in children. National Psychological Journal,1, 88–97.doi: 10.11621/npj.2018.0108

  5. Galperin, P.Ya. (1969). Stages in the development of mental acts. In M. Cole & I. Maltzman (Eds.) A handbook of contemporary soviet psychology. New York: Basic Book, 249–273.

  6. Galperin P.Ya. (1966). Psychology of thinking and the doctrine of the gradual formation of mental actions. [Issledovaniya myshleniya v sovetskoy psikhologii].Moscow, Nauka.

  7.  Galperin P.Ya. (2017). Experience of studying the development of mental actions. [Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta]. Series 14. Psychology, 4, 3–20. doi: 10.11621/vsp.2017.04.03

  8. Grigorenko, E.L. & Stepanossova, O. (2006). Creativity in Soviet-Russian Psychology. In J.C. Kaufman & R.J. Sternberg (Eds). InternationalHandbook of Creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 235–269.doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511818240.009

  9. Guilford, J.P. (1950) Creativity. American Psychologist, 5 (9), 444-454.

  10. doi: 10.1037/h0063487

  11. J.C. Kaufman & R.J. Sternberg (Eds.) (2006).International Handbook of Creativity.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511818240

  12. Lytton, H. (1971). Creativity and education. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

  13. Obukhov L.F. (2016). Developmental psychology: textbook. Moscow Yurayt. 

  14.  Obukhova L.F. (2007). Unfinished Disputes. P.I. Galperin and J. Piaget on the action-producing schemas.  [Vozrastnaya psikhologiya: uchebnik dlya vuzov].Moscow, Vysshee obrazovanie; MGPPU, 392–411.

  15. Obukhova L.F. (1968). A system of physical concepts applied to solving problems. In eds. P.I. Galperin, & N.F. Talyzina [Zavisimost' obucheniya ot tipa orientirovochnoy deyatel'nosti]. Moscow, 153–186.

  16.  Obukhov L.F. (1972). Stages of child thinking development. Moscow, Izdatel’stvo Moskovskogo Universiteta. 

  17. Obukhova L.F., & Churbanova S.M. (1995). The development of divergent thinking in childhood. Moscow, Izdatel’stvo Moskovskogo Universiteta. 

  18. Obukhova L.F., & Churbanova S.M. (2014). Conditions for the emergence of a variety of ideas when solving divergent problems by preschool children. In Eds. N.E. Veraksa, & A.N. Veraksa [Doshkol'naya pedagogika i psikhologiya: khrestomatiya]. Moscow, Mozaik-Sintez, 405–416.

  19. Obukhova, L.F. (2012). Vygotsky and Developmental Psychology in His and Our Time. Cultural-Historical Psychology,1, 51–58.

  20. Obukhova, L.F., & Churbanova, S.M. (1992). Psychological condition for productivity in schoolchildren's divergent problem-solving. Journal of Russian & East European Psychology, 30(1), 57–76.doi: 10.2753/RPO1061-0405300157

  21. Reisman, F.K. & Torrance, E.P., (1980). Alternative procedures for assessing intellectual strengths young children. Psychological Reports, 46(1), 227–230.

  22. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1980.46.1.227

  23. Rose, L.H., & Lin, H. (1984). A meta-analysis of long-term creativity training programs. Journal of Creative Behavior, 18(1), 11–22. doi: 10.1002/j.2162-6057.1984.tb00985.x

  24. Salmina N.G., & Sokhina V.P. (1975). Teaching Mathematics in Primary School (based on an experimental program). Moscow, Pedagogika. 

  25. Semenov I.N. (2017). The contribution of L.F. Obukhova in general and pedagogical psychology of the formation of creative thinking. [Psikhologiya tret'ego tysyacheletiya». IV Mezhdunarodnaya nauchno-prakticheskaya konferentsiya pamyati professora L.F. Obukhovoy: sbornik materialov].  Dubna: Izdatel’stvo gos Universitet Dubna, 124–127.

  26. Shabelnikov V.K. (1982). quick mental response (psychological mechanisms of "direct understanding"): monograph. Alma-Ata, Mektep. 

  27. Talyzina N.F. (1998). Pedagogical psychology. Moscow, Akademiya. 

  28. Tisone, J.M., & Wismar, B.L. (1985). Microcomputers: How Can They be Used to Enhance Creative Development? Journal of Creative Behavior, 19(2), 97–103. doi: 10.1002/j.2162-6057.1985.tb00642.x

  29. Torrance, E.P. (1968). A longitudinal examination of the fourth-grade slump in creativity. Gifted Child Quarterly, 12,195–199.doi: 10.1177/001698626801200401

  30. Torrance, E.P. (1972). Can we Teach Children To Think Creatively? Journal of Creative Behavior, 6(2), 114–143. doi: 10.1002/j.2162-6057.1972.tb00923.x

  31. Torrance, E.P. (1962). Guiding creative talent. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. doi: 10.1037/13134-000

  32. Torrance, E.P. (1966) The Torrance tests of creative thinking-norms-technical manual research edition-verbal tests, forms A and B-figural tests, forms A and B. Princeton.NJ: Personnel Press.

  33. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978) Mind in society. The development of higher psychological processes. M. Cole at al. (Eds). Cambridge. MA: Harvard university press.

  34. Wenger L.A. (1969). Perception and learning (preschool age). Moscow, Prosvescvhenie.

  35. Zaporozhets A.V., & Usova A.P. (1963). Sensory education of preschool children. Moscow, Prosveschenie.

For citing this article:

Svetlana M. Churbanova. (2019). L. F. Obukhova’s ideas to the development of children creativity. National Psychological Journal. 2, 19-24.

About Editorial Board Volumes Authors For Authors Indexing Contacts
CC BY-NC

National Psychological Journal, 2006 - 2020