Recieved: 10/03/2023
Accepted: 11/13/2023
Published: 12/07/2023
Keywords: psychology of art; actor psychology; virtual reality; visual attention; working memory
p.: 38-52
DOI: 10.11621/npj.2023.0404
Available online: 07.12.2023
Mashkov Vladimir L., Nefeld Ekaterina E., Kovalev, A. I., Dolgikh Alexandra G., Smirnova Ekaterina A., Samuseva Marina V. , Strelnikov Stepan V., Rogacheva Daria A., Vakhantseva Olga V.. Manifestations of Higher Mental Functions in Actors in Virtual Reality. // National Psychological Journal 2023. 4. p.38-52. doi: 10.11621/npj.2023.0404
Copied to Clipboard
CopyBackground. The study of the professional activities of actors from the standpoint of modern psychological theories is an urgent task for psychology of art. In particular, the question of whether there is a significant difference in the functioning of cognitive processes in actors as a result of training in acting techniques is considered. The answer can be revealed not only by classical measurements of the development of higher mental functions using standardized methods, but also, to a large extent, by the assessment of cognitive abilities in special conditions of virtual reality.
Objectives. The study is aimed at measuring success parameters for actors performing tasks to assess the level of cognitive functioning in virtual reality in comparison with a group of students who are not actors.
Methods. During the experiment, the control (students who are not actors) and experimental (novice actors) groups were asked to complete tasks to assess the level of cognitive functioning in two-dimensional and virtual reality formats. In order to do this, the experiment participants first performed two-dimensional tests to assess visual attention and working memory, and then did tasks to assess attention and memory in the HTC Vive Pro virtual reality helmet in a special virtual environment “Upgrade VR”.
Sample. Two groups of subjects took part in the experiment. The experimental group consisted of 10 students of the O. Tabakov School (average age 17 years). The control group included 20 subjects (18 women, 2 men, average age 18 years) — students of the Faculty of Psychology at Lomonosov Moscow State University.
Results. Comparing the performance of actors before and after immersion in virtual reality on two-dimensional computerized task assessing working memory, no significant differences were found (t = –1.35, df = 9, p = 0.209). Also, no significant differences were found when comparing the results of actors performing tasks to assess attention parameters (t = –0.070, df = 9, p = 0.946). When comparing the results of actors and students in performing tasks in virtual reality, significant differences were revealed in the success of completing a spatial orientation task (t = –4.44, df = 28, p < 0.001) and a task assessing working memory (t = –2.34, df = 28, p = 0.027). In addition, significant differences were identified in the average success rates in completing two-dimensional tasks between actors and students before immersion in VR according to the results of the N-back technique (t = 2.4, df = 28, p < 0.023) and the SART technique (t = –3.95, df = 28, p < 0.001).
Conclusions. The study revealed differences in parameters of cognitive functioning between actors and students, especially noticeable when performing tasks in virtual reality related to spatial orientation and working memory. The use of virtual reality allows you to simulate a stage situation and create training conditions for the development of cognitive skills, reactions to unexpected events and emotional expression of actors. The results of the study showed that the use of digital technologies in art opens up new opportunities for the creative process and for the construction of unique artistic images.
Abich, IV, J., Parker, J., Murphy, J.S., and Yudi, M. (2021). Review of the evidence on the effectiveness of training using virtual reality technology. Virtual Reality, 25(4), 919–933.
Arrigi, G., Sm., Z.S., & Jones, D. (2021). Virtual Reality of the Victoria Theater: a case study of digital heritage and user experience design. Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage, 21, e00176.
Barbulescu, A., Ronfard, R., Bailly, G., Gagneré, G., & Cakmak, H. (2014). Beyond basic emotions: expressive virtual actors with social attitudes. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Motion in Games (pp. 39–47). Los Angeles: US.
Brown, S., Coquette, P., Yuan, Yu. (2019). The Neurology of Romeo and Juliet: A study of acting using MRI. Royal Society for Open Science, 6(3), 181–908.
Davis, Charles (1998). “Osmose: Notes on Staying in an immersive Virtual Space”, Digital Creativity, 9(2), 65–74.
Dunn, K., Luckett, S. D., and Seacre, D. (2020). Teaches colored theater students in the United States. Teaching Theater, Dance and Performing Arts, 11(3), 274–282.
de Gelder, B., Kacyri, J., de Borst, A.V. (2018). Virtual reality and new psychophysics. British Journal of Psychology, 109(3), 421–426.
Genet, A., Lecuyer, A., Hachet, M. (2021). Being an avatar “for real”: a survey about virtual incarnation in augmented reality. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 28 (12), 5071–5090.
Gruzelier, J., Inoue, A., Smart, R., Steed, A., and Steffert, T. (2010). Acting and flow state are improved thanks to neurofeedback with sensory-motor rhythm, comparing environmentally sound scenarios of immersion in virtual reality and a training screen. Letters on Neurology, 480(2), 112–116.
Horn, J.F., Konijn, E.A., Van der Veer, G.S. (2003). Virtual Reality: Don’t enhance realism, increase relevance. Human-Computer Interaction: Overcoming Barriers, 4(1), 18–26.
ieVR (1995), “Arithmometer: Virtual Reality Project”, database entry, Digital Performance Archive, http://art.ntu.ac.uk/dpa; and an extended version at. http://kuhttp.cc.ukans.edu /~mreaney/reaney/ (accessed October 2003).
Jaggi, S.M., Bushkul, M., Perrig, W.J., and Meyer, B. (2010). Parallel validity of the N-back task as an indicator of working memory. Memory, 18, 394–412.
Hagen, W. (1991). A challenge for an actor. Simon and Schuster. New York, NY: Scribner
Laurel, B., & Strickland, R. (1996). Placeholder. In Immersed in Technology: Art and Virtual Environments (pp. 297–298). MA: MIT Press
Lusta, M., Seals, S., Tubner-Rhodes, S., Akula, S.S. and Richardson, A. (2023). The use of virtual reality to assess the impact of the degree of presence on the performance of a person’s working memory. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 120–130). Cham: Springer nature of Switzerland.
Mashkov, V.L. et al. (2022). Methodological foundations of the psychology of theatrical activity. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Seriya 14. Psikhologiya (Moscow University Psychology Bulletin), 4, 179–199. (In Russ.).
Mori, J.F. (2007). Performing in (virtual) spaces: embodiment and being in virtual environments. International Journal of Performing Arts and Digital Media, 3(2–3), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1386/padm .3.2–3.123_1 Pavlov, I.P. (1950). Selected works on the physiology of higher nervous activity. Moscow: Uchpedgiz. (In Russ.).
Paul, C. (2023). Digital art. London: Thames & Hudson.
Rini, M. (1999). Virtual Reality and theater: immersion in virtual worlds. Digital Creativity, 10(3), 183–188.
Reeve, K. (2000). Presence in a virtual cinema. Presence, 9(2), 209–213.
Robertson, I.H., Manley, T., Andrade, J., Baddeley, B.T., Yend, J. (1997). “Oops!”: indicators correlating with everyday attention disorders in patients with traumatic brain injury and normal subjects. Neuropsychology, 35(6), 747–758.
Sanchez-Vives M.V., Slater M. (2005). From presence to consciousness through virtual reality. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6(4), 332–339.
Slater, M., Howell, J., Steed, A., Pertaub, D.P., & Garau, M. (2000). Acting in virtual reality. Proceedings of the third international conference on Collaborative virtual environments (pp. 103–110). San Francisco: California.
Slater, M. (2009). The illusion of place and verisimilitude can lead to realistic behavior in immersive virtual environments. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1535), 3549–3557.
Stanislavsky, K.S. (2010). The actor’s work on the role. Moscow: AST. (In Russ.).
Song, Yu., Liu, Yu., Lin, P.H., and Lin, R. (2022). Comparison of cognitive differences of works of art between artists and the transfer of artistic style. Applied Sciences, 12(11), 5525.
Sun, R., Wu, Y.J., Tsai, K. (2019). The influence of the virtual reality learning environment on the spatial abilities of students. Virtual Reality, 23, 385–398.
Varmakhani, S., Abbasi, Z., Hiv, S., and Rusty, J. (2022). Spatial and attentive consequences of virtual reality and attitude to cyberbullying. Virtual Reality, 26(2), 659–668.
Velichkovsky, B.B. (2014). Psychological factors of the emergence of a sense of presence in virtual environments. Natsional’nyi psikhologicheskii zhurnal (National Psychological Journal), 3(15), 28–35. (In Russ.).
Vinogradskaya, I.N. (1976). The life and work of K.S. Stanislavsky, 4. Moscow: WTO. (In Russ.).
Waddell, G., and Williamon, A. (2019). The use of technology and attitude to music education. Boundaries in the field of ICT, 6, 11.
Mashkov Vladimir L., Nefeld Ekaterina E., Kovalev, A. I., Dolgikh Alexandra G., Smirnova Ekaterina A., Samuseva Marina V. , Strelnikov Stepan V., Rogacheva Daria A., Vakhantseva Olga V.. Manifestations of Higher Mental Functions in Actors in Virtual Reality. // National Psychological Journal 2023. 4. p.38-52. doi: 10.11621/npj.2023.0404
Copied to Clipboard
Copy