ISSN 2079-6617
eISSN 2309-9828
Psychology of art in a transitive world: the aesthetics of change

Psychology of art in a transitive world: the aesthetics of change

PDF (Rus)

Recieved: 01/18/2023

Accepted: 07/05/2023

Published: 08/17/2023

Keywords: art; transitive world; external and internal form of a work of art; abstract art; languages of art

p.: 16-24

DOI: 10.11621/npj.2023.0303

Available online: 17.08.2023

To cite this article:

Martsinkovskaya, T. D.. Psychology of art in a transitive world: the aesthetics of change. // National Psychological Journal 2023. 3. p.16-24. doi: 10.11621/npj.2023.0303

Copied to Clipboard

Copy
Issue 3, 2023

Martsinkovskaya, T. D. Russian State University For The Humanities , Federal Scientific Center of Psychological and Multidisciplinary Research

Abstract

Background. The modern changeable and uncertain situation actualizes the problem of art, which is able to reflect the emotional experiences of people, harmonize their ideas about themselves and the world, and also play the role of a certain coping strategy that helps to overcome uncertainty and variability.

Objective. The study aims to work out the theoretical and methodological analysis of trends that have existed in the art of the XX–XXI centuries.

Methods. Comparative analysis of the concepts of the psychology of art in the XX–XXI centuries and the new aesthetic concepts of the last decades of the XXI century is carried out.

Results. The results obtained showed that contemporary art combines the aesthetics of everyday life and the “torn” aesthetics of abrupt changes. Crystallization of artists and viewers’ experiences connects them with a commonality of emotions and attitudes to the situation. The mechanism of both creativity and catharsis is the mutual “spots of time”, leading from disharmony to harmony between the human and the world.

Conclusion. The changed situation throughout the world leads to change in the “language” of art, which obtains new mechanisms of emotional impact. Aesthetics of transitivity connects aesthetic transformations with everyday life, making new images familiar. This leads to the fact that these images become a new type of aesthetics and help to get used to the transformations.

References

Arnheim, R. (1974). Art and visual perception. M.: Progress. (In Russ.).

Chelpanov, G.I. (2012). Essays in psychology. M.: PI RAO. (In Russ.).

Eisenstein, S.M. (2002). Psychological questions of art. M.: Smysl. (In Russ.).

Gabrichevsky, A.G. (2002). Morphology of art. M.: Agraf. (In Russ.).

Gibson, J. (1988). Ecological approach to visual perception. M.: Progress. (In Russ.).

Martsinkovskaya, T.D. (2015). Aesthetic paradigm in modern psychology: harmonization of experiences of time and space. Psychological Questions, 6, 1–11. (In Russ.).

Martsinkovskaya, T.D. (2016). Culture and subculture in the space of the psychological chronotope. M.: Smysl. (In Russ.).

Martsinkovskaya, T.D. (2008). Psychology of perception of abstract art. Psychological Questions, 6, 83–91. (In Russ.).

Shpet, G.G. (2007). Philosophy and psychology of culture. M.: Nauka. (In Russ.).

Teplov, B.M. (2009). Selected psychological works. Moscow; Voronezh: NPO “MODEK”. (In Russ.).

Wordsworth, W. (1979). The Prelude, Authoritative Texts. N.Y. and London: A Norton Critical Edition.
To cite this article:

Martsinkovskaya, T. D.. Psychology of art in a transitive world: the aesthetics of change. // National Psychological Journal 2023. 3. p.16-24. doi: 10.11621/npj.2023.0303

Copied to Clipboard

Copy