ISSN 2079-6617
eISSN 2309-9828
Assessing Auditory-Verbal Processing Functions in Primary School Children Using a Pseudowords Repetition Method

Assessing Auditory-Verbal Processing Functions in Primary School Children Using a Pseudowords Repetition Method

PDF (Rus)

Recieved: 02/08/2026

Accepted: 05/26/2026

Published: 06/06/2026

Keywords: pseudoword repetition; neuropsychological diagnosis; auditory-verbal functions; auditory-verbal memory; primary school students

Pages: 85-99

DOI: 10.11621/npj.2026.0307

Available online: 06.06.2026

To cite this article:

Karmen, O.R. , Korneev, A.A., Matveeva, E.Yu. , Akhutina, T.V. (2026). Assessing Auditory-Verbal Processing Functions in Primary School Children Using a Pseudowords Repetition Method. National Psychological Journal, 21(3) , 85-99. https://doi.org/10.11621/npj.2026.0307

Copied to Clipboard

Copy
Issue 3, 2026

Karmen, O.R. Clinical and Research Institute of Emergency Pediatric Surgery and Traumatology

Korneev, A.A. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Institute of Child Development, Health and Adaptation

Matveeva, E.Yu. Lomonosov Moscow State University

Akhutina, T.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University

Abstract

Background. The assessment of auditory-verbal functions in children is important for understanding the general patterns of their development. It is also necessary for identifying children with weaknesses in this area and providing them with appropriate correction and development. Despite the existence of numerous diagnostic methods for evaluating these functions, the development of novel tools and the estimation of their sensitivity persist as significant and pertinent endeavours.

Objective. The objective of this study is to assess the effectiveness of a developed procedure for reproducing pseudo-words (PW) in evaluating the state of auditory-verbal functions in primary school children.

Study Participants. The study involved 129 elementary school students, including 54 second graders and 32 third graders without learning disabilities (LD) and 23 second graders and 20 third graders with LD.

Methods. All children completed the "Pseudowords" methodology developed by the authors. This method included two sets of PW with varying degrees of similarity to real words, varying in length (two- and three-syllable PW) and number (presented individually or in pairs). The auditory stimuli were presented to the subjects, who were instructed to reproduce them with the maximum degree of accuracy. The responses of the subjects were recorded and subsequently analysed. The children also underwent a neuropsychological assessment including evaluation of their auditory-verbal information processing and executive functions.

Results. An analysis of the data demonstrated that, in general, children with learning disabilities tend to reproduce PW less accurately. In addition, the success of reproduction decreased with increasing length of the stimuli and their number in both groups. However, this effect was more pronounced in the LD group. A comparison of the two types of PW — those similar to real words and those dissimilar to real words — revealed that PW close to real words are reproduced better than those far from real words. Furthermore, the effects of PW length and number are more pronounced when reproducing PW that are dissimilar to real words. The expected correlations between the results of the method and neuropsychological indicators of auditory-verbal information processing and executive functions were also identified.

Conclusion. The proposed method demonstrates sensitivity to the evaluation of auditory-verbal information processing functions in children with developmental disorders. Due to the variety of stimuli (pseudowords of different types and lengths), it can be utilized to study the patterns of development and conduct a detailed assessment of the state of auditory-verbal information processing functions in primary school children with normal and abnormal development.

References

Balthazar, C.H. (2003). The word length effect in children with language impairment. Journal of Communication Disorders, 36(6), 487–505.

Baron, I.S. (2018). Neuropsychological evaluation of the child: Domains, methods, & case studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Best, J.R., Miller, P.H. (2010). A developmental perspective on executive function. Child Development, 81(6), 1641–1660.

Bezrukikh, M.M., Sonkin, V.D., Farber, D.A. (2009). Developmental Physiology (Child Development Physiology). Moscow: URSS Publ. (In Russ.)

Bishop, D.V., North, T., Donlan, C. (1996). Nonword repetition as a behavioural marker for inherited language impairment: Evidence from a twin study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 37(4), 391–403.

Chandran, M., Neelamegarajan, D. (2024). Auditory working memory measures in children with hearing impairment: a systematic review. The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology, 40(1), 35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43163-024-00593-6

Charles, C.M., MacLeod, A.A., Sutton, A. (2024). Developmental patterns of non-word repetition by monolingual and bilingual school-aged children. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 26(4), 505–517.

Davidson, M.C., Amso, D., Anderson, L.C., Diamond, A. (2006). Development of cognitive control and executive functions from 4 to 13 years: Evidence from manipulations of memory, inhibition, and task switching. Neuropsychologia, 44(11), 2037–2078.

Dehaene, S., Pegado, F., Braga, L.W., Ventura, P., Filho, G.N., Jobert, A., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., Kolinsky, R., Morais, J., Cohen, L. (2010). How learning to read changes the cortical networks for vision and language. Science, 330(6009), 1359–1364.

Dorofeeva, S.V., Dragoy, O.V. (2021). Methodological Guide to the ZARYA Test Battery for Assessing Phonological Processing Skills (Sound Analysis of the Russian Language). Higher School of Economics: Official Website. (In Russ.). URL: https://www.hse.ru/data/2021/08/25/1414837805/RuToPP_manual.pdf (accessed: 05.02.2026).

Dorofeeva, S.V., Grinko, I.Yu., Perevoshchikova, T.D., Dragoy, O.V. (2021). Development of word and pseudoword reading tests for assessing reading skills in Russian-speaking children. In: E.V. Pechenkova, M.V. Falikman, A.Ya. Koifman, (eds.). Cognitive Science in Moscow: New Research. Conference Proceedings (June 23–24, 2021). (pp. 502–507). Moscow: Buki Vedi LLC Publ. (In Russ.)

Dorofeeva, S.V., Reshetnikova, V.A., Iskra, E.V., Goranskaya, D.N., Zyryanov, A.S., Gordeeva, E.A., Serebryakova, M.N., Akhutina, T.V., Dragoy, O.V. (2021). Investigation of phonological deficits in Russian-speaking children with dyslexia. In: First National Congress on Cognitive Research, Artificial Intelligence, and Neuroinformatics; Ninth International Conference on Cognitive Science: Proceedings, Vol. 2. (October 10–16, 2020). (pp. 158–160). Moscow: NRNU MEPhI Publ. (In Russ.)

Dorofeeva, S.V., Reshetnikova, V.A., Zyryanov, A.S., Goranskaya, D.N., Gordeeva, E.A., Serebryakova, M.N., Akhutina, T.V., Dragoy, O.V. (2018). A test battery for identifying characteristics of phonological processing in Russian-speaking children: Normative data and data from a group of children with dyslexia. In: A.K. Krylov, V.D. Solovyev, (eds.). Eighth International Conference on Cognitive Science: Abstracts, Svetlogorsk (October 18–21, 2018). (pp. 331–333). Moscow: Institute of Psychology of Russian Academy of Sciences Publ. (In Russ.)

Edwards, J., Beckman, M.E., Munson, B. (2004). The interaction between vocabulary size and phonotactic probability effects on children's production accuracy and fluency in nonword repetition. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47(2), 421–436.

Farquharson, K., Centanni, T.M., Franzluebbers, C.E., Hogan, T.P. (2014). Phonological and lexical influences on phonological awareness in children with specific language impairment and dyslexia. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 838.

Fletcher, J.M., Lyon, G.R., Fuchs, L.S., Barnes, M.A. (2018). Learning disabilities: From identification to intervention. New York: Guilford Publications.

Gathercole, S.E. (1998). The development of memory. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 39(1), 3–27.

Gathercole, S.E., Willis, C.S., Baddeley, A.D., Emslie, H. (1994). The children's test of nonword repetition: A test of phonological working memory. Memory, 2(2), 103–127.

Glozman, Zh.M., Soboleva, A.E., Titova, Yu.O. (2008). Neuropsychological Assessment of Preschool Children. St. Petersburg: Piter Publ. (In Russ.)

Grigoryeva, I.A., Kornev, A.N., Oganov, S.R. (2018). Recording of eye movements during the copying of quasi-words in children with dysgraphia (ages 8–9) and their healthy peers. Detskaya meditsina Severo-Zapada = Pediatric Medicine of the North-West, 7(1), 93–94. (In Russ.)

Isaacs, E.B., Vargha-Khadem, F. (1989). Differential course of development of spatial and verbal memory span: A normative study. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 7(4), 377–380.

Juul, H., Petersen, D.K. (2017). Length effects in pseudo-word spelling: stronger in dyslexic than in non-dyslexic students. Annals of Dyslexia, 67(3), 369–382.

Kavitskaya, D., Babyonyshev, M., Walls, T., Grigorenko, E. (2011). Investigating the effects of syllable complexity in Russian-speaking children with SLI. Journal of Child Language, 38(5), 979–998.

Khodakovskaya, G.F. (2014). Comparative Neuropsychological Analysis of Auditory-Verbal Memory Characteristics in First-Graders with Varying Academic Success. Acta Biomedica Scientifica, 99(5), 24–26. (In Russ.)

Luria, A.R. (1969). Higher Cortical Functions in Man and Their Impairment in Local Brain Lesions. Moscow: Moscow Univ. Press. (In Russ.)

Martínez-Tomás, C., Baciero, A., Lázaro, M., Hinojosa, J.A. (2025). What do pseudowords tell us about word processing? An overview. Frontiers in Language Sciences, 4, 1504770.

Methods of Neuropsychological Assessment for Children Aged 6–9. (2016). In: T.V. Akhutina, A.A. Korneev, E.Yu. Matveeva, et al. (eds.). Moscow: V. Sekachev Publ. (In Russ.)

Mikadze, Yu.V. (1999). Differential neuropsychology of memory formation in early school age. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie = Psychological Science and Education, 4(2), 87–98. (In Russ.)

Munson, B., Swenson, C.L., Manthei, S.C. (2005). Lexical and phonological organization in children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 48(1), 108–124.

Newman, S.D., Twieg, D. (2001). Differences in auditory processing of words and pseudowords: An fMRI study. Human Brain Mapping, 14(1), 39–47.

Ramus, F., Marshall, C.R., Rosen, S., van der Lely, H.K. (2013). Phonological deficits in specific language impairment and developmental dyslexia: Towards a multidimensional model. Brain, 136(2), 630–645.

Rul', N.N., Gorobets, E.A., Rezvina, I.A. (2018). Pseudoword repetition by Russian-speaking children: Materials for neurolinguistic analysis. Filologiya i kul'tura = Philology and Culture, 52(2), 121–127. (In Russ.)

Semenova, O.A., Koshelkov, D.A., Machinskaya, R.I. (2007). Age-related changes in the voluntary regulation of activity during late preschool and early school age. Kul'turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya = Cultural-Historical Psychology, 3(4), 39–49. (In Russ.)

Souza, C.A.D., Escarce, A.G., Lemos, S.M.A. (2019). Reading competence of words and pseudo words, school performance and listening skills in primary schools. Audiology-Communication Research, 24, e2018.

Swanson, H.L., Siegel, L. (2011). Learning disabilities as a working memory deficit. Experimental Psychology, 49(1), 5–28.

Velichenkova, O.A., Belousova, K.V., Khakimullina, R.R. (2022). Age-related indicators of phonological working memory in primary school students with learning difficulties (based on online diagnostic data). Vestnik Moskovskogo gorodskogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Seriya: Pedagogika i psikhologiya = Bulletin of the Moscow City University. Series: Pedagogy and Psychology, 16(3), 195–214. (In Russ.)

Velichenkova, O.A., Guseva, V.G. (2022). Performance on auditory-verbal tasks by schoolchildren with learning difficulties. Uchenye zapiski Kazanskogo universiteta. Seriya Gumanitarnye nauki = Scientific Notes of Kazan University. Series: Humanities, 164(1–2), 28–40. (In Russ.)

Velichenkova, O.A., Rusetskaya, M.N. (2015). Speech Therapy Interventions for Overcoming Reading and Writing Disorders in Primary School Students. Moscow: National Book Center. (In Russ.)

Yuzawa, M. (2001). Effects of word length on young children's memory performance. Memory & Cognition, 29(4), 557–564.

Zhang, Z., Peng, P. (2022). Reading real words versus pseudowords: A meta-analysis of research in developmental dyslexia. Developmental Psychology, 58(6), 1035.
To cite this article:

Karmen, O.R. , Korneev, A.A., Matveeva, E.Yu. , Akhutina, T.V. . Assessing Auditory-Verbal Processing Functions in Primary School Children Using a Pseudowords Repetition Method. // National Psychological Journal 2026. 3. Pages85-99. doi: 10.11621/npj.2026.0307

Copied to Clipboard

Copy