ISSN 2079-6617
eISSN 2309-9828
Formula for the Digital Wellbeing of the Personality

Formula for the Digital Wellbeing of the Personality

PDF (Rus)

Recieved: 11/22/2024

Accepted: 11/06/2025

Published: 12/20/2025

Keywords: psychological wellbeing; digital wellbeing; digital culture; digital competence; digital socialisation

Pages: 44-53

DOI: 10.11621/npj.2026.0104

Available online: 20.12.2025

To cite this article:

Chigarkova, S.V., Soldatova, G.U. (2026). Formula for the Digital Wellbeing of the Personality. National Psychological Journal, 21(1) , 44-53. https://doi.org/10.11621/npj.2026.0104

Copied to Clipboard

Copy
Issue 1, 2026

Chigarkova, S.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University

Soldatova, G.U. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow Institute of Psychoanalysis

Abstract

Background. In the context of the digitalisation of everyday life, digital wellbeing is a concept that has recently emerged. It signifies the need to reflect on the impact of digital transformations on various spheres of human life, and is becoming the most important type of a person’s wellbeing.

Objectives
. The study is devoted to the analysis of modern approaches to psychological wellbeing in the digital world and digital wellbeing as a socio-psychological phenomenon.

Methods
. The study involved a theoretical analysis and systematisation of modern scientific approaches to digital wellbeing. The socio-cognitive concept of digital socialisation served as the methodological framework to the study.

Results
. The key areas of research on the relationship between wellbeing and different aspects of digital technology use are identified. These aspects are: digital access, digital inequality and digital competence; problematic internet use, screen time and gaming; the impact of digital technologies on cognitive development; social media use and digital practices as factors of wellbeing; the development of artificial intelligence technologies as a new challenge to wellbeing. The existing concepts of digital wellbeing have been analysed and a formula for digital wellbeing has been proposed, comprised of three components. These are firstly satisfaction with connectedness and management of mixed reality, secondly self-efficacy and management of digital extended personality, and thirdly satisfaction and management of digital sociality.

Conclusions
. The development of a formula for digital wellbeing contributes to the understanding of constructive strategies of human adaptation and pre-adaptation in the context of increasing digitalisation of everyday life. These are necessary both to maintain an optimal level of stability of society and to ensure its development in the near future in response to new socio-technological challenges.

References

Aagaard, J. (2020). Beyond the rhetoric of tech addiction: why we should be discussing tech habits instead (and how). Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 20(3), 559–572. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-020-09669-z

Aissaoui, N. (2021). The digital divide: a literature review and some directions for future research in light of COVID-19. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, 71(8/9), 686–708. https://doi.org/10.1108/gkmc-06-2020-0075

Aseeva, I.A. (2023). Digital well-being of society: an interdisciplinary approach. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofija. Sociologija. Politologija = Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political science, (71), 138–148. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17223/1998863Х/71/14

Belinskaya, E.P., Shayekhov, Z.D. (2023). Psychological well-being and adaptation to the risks of digital world at a young age. Lomonosov Psychology Journal, 46(3), 239–260. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.11621/LPJ-23-35

Belk, R. (2016). Extended self and the digital world. Current Opinion in Psychology, 10, 50–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.11.003

Boer, M., van Den Eijnden, R.J.J.M., Boniel-Nissim, M., Wong, S.-L., Inchley, J.C., Badura, P., Craig, W.M., Gobina, I., Kleszczewska, D., Klanšček, H.J., Stevens, G.W.J.M. (2020). Adolescents’ intense and problematic social media use and their well-being in 29 countries. Journal of Adolescent Health, 66(6), S89–S99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.02.014

Brubaker, R. (2022). Hyperconnectivity and its discontents. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Büchi, M. (2024). Digital well-being theory and research. New Media and Society, 26(1), 172–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211056851

Burr, C., Taddeo, M., Floridi, L. (2020). The Ethics of digital well-being: a thematic review. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26(4), 2313–2343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-020-00175-8

Children’s Wellbeing in a Digital World — 2022 Index Report. (2022). Internet Matters. URL: https://www.internetmatters.org/hub/research/childrens-wellbeing-in-a-digital-world-index-report-2022/ (accessed: 29.07.2024).

Cramarenco, R.E., Burcă-Voicu, M.I., Dabija, D.C. (2023). The impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on employees’ skills and well-being in global labor markets: A systematic review. Oeconomia Copernicana, 14(3), 731–767. https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2023.022

Danovitch, J.H. (2019). Growing up with Google: How children’s understanding and use of internet-based devices relates to cognitive development. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 1(2), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.142

Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D., Oishi, S., Biswas-Diener, R. (2010). New well-being measures: Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 97(2), 143–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9493-y

Digital Quality of Life Index (2023). Surfshark. URL: https://surfshark.com/dql2023 (accessed: 29.08.2024).

Digital Well-Being Index. (2022). Snap Inc., February, 2023. URL: https://values.snap.com/safety/dwbi (accessed: 09.09.2024).

Elhai, J.D., Levine, J.C., Hall, B.J. (2019). The relationship between anxiety symptom severity and problematic smartphone use: A review of the literature and conceptual frameworks. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 62, 45–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2018.11.005

Firth, J.A., Torous, J., Firth, J. (2020). Exploring the impact of internet use on memory and attention processes. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(24), 9481. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33348890/ (accessed: 29.08.2024).

Gasper, D. (2007). Human well-being: concepts and conceptualizations. In: M. McGillivray, (ed.). Human well-being: concept and measurement. (pp. 23–64). London: Palgrave Macmillan Publ.

Gerasimova, A.A., Kholmogorova, A.B. (2020). Coping strategies, psychological well-being and problematic internet use during a pandemic. Psychological Science and Education, 25(6), 31–40. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/pse.2020250603

Global Digital Wellbeing Index Executive Summary. (2024). Sync. URL: https://sync.ithra.com/dwi/en/index-report (accessed: 09.09.2024).

Griffioen, N., Scholten, H., Lichtwarck-Aschoff, A., van Rooij, M., Granic, I. (2021). Everyone does it—differently: A window into emerging adults’ smartphone use. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8, 177. URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-021-00863-1 (accessed: 29.08.2024).

Horwood, S., Anglim, J. (2019). Problematic smartphone usage and subjective and psychological well-being. Computers in Human Behavior, 97, 44–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.02.028

Jæger, B. (2021). Digital Citizenship — A review of the academic literature. Der Moderne Staat. Zeitschrift für Public Policy Recht und Management, 14(1–2021), 24–42. https://doi.org/10.3224/dms.v14i1.09

Johannes, N., Vuorre, M., Przybylski, A.K. (2021). Video game play is positively correlated with well-being. Royal Society Open Science, 8(2), 202049. URL: https://royalsocietypublishing.org/rsos/article/8/2/202049/95851/Video-game-play-is-positively-correlated-with-well (accessed: 29.08.2024).

Karabanova, O.A., Tikhomandrytskaya, O.A., Molchanov, S.V. (2023). Psychological adaptation of adults with different levels of dispositional optimism to the risks of digitalization in professional activity. National Psychological Journal, 18(4), 3–15. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.11621/npj.2023.0401

Kuo-Hsun Ma, J., Cheng, S. (2022). Digital inclusion, psychological well-being, and digital competence. In: R.J. Estes, M.J. Sirgy, (eds.). Adolescent well-being and ICT use: Social and policy implications. (pp. 125–166). Cham: Springer Publ.

Lee, S., Chung, J.E., Park, N. (2018). Network environments and well-being: an examination of personal network structure, social capital, and perceived social support. Health Communication, 33(1), 22–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2016.1242032

Li, H., Zhang, R., Lee, Y.-C., Kraut, R.E., Mohr, D.C. (2023). Systematic review and meta-analysis of AI-based conversational agents for promoting mental health and well-being. npj Digital Medicine, 6, 236. URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41746-023-00979-5 (accessed: 29.08.2024).

Lippke, S., Dahmen, A., Gao, L., Guza, E., Nigg, C.R. (2021). To what extent is internet activity predictive of psychological well-being? Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 14, 207–219. https://doi.org/10.2147/prbm.s274502

Magnusson, K., Johansson, F., Przybylski, A.K. (2024). Harmful compared to what? The problem of gaming and ambiguous causal questions. Addiction, 119(8), 1478–1486. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.16516

Marsh, E.J., Rajaram, S. (2019). The digital expansion of the mind: Implications of internet usage for memory and cognition. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 8(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.11.001

Meng, S., Cheng, J., Li, Y., Yang, X., Zheng, J., Chang, X., Shi, Y., Chen, Y., Lu, L., Sun, Y., Bao, Y., Shi, J. (2022). Global prevalence of digital addiction in general population: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 92, 102128. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0272735822000137?via%3Dihub (accessed: 03.12.2025).

Midgley, C., Thai, S., Lockwood, P., Kovacheff, C., Page-Gould, E. (2021). When every day is a high school reunion: Social media comparisons and self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 121(2), 285–307. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000336

Montag, C., Nakov, P., Ali, R. (2024). Considering the IMPACT framework to understand the AI-well-being-complex from an interdisciplinary perspective. Telematics and Informatics Reports, 13, 100112. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772503023000725?via%3Dihub (accessed: 03.12.2025).

Nakayama, H., Ueno, F., Mihara, S., Kitayuguchi, T., Higuchi, S. (2020). Relationship between problematic Internet use and age at initial weekly Internet use. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 9(1), 129–139. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.2020.00009

Paez, D., Delfino, G., Vargas-Salfate, S., Liu, J.H., De Zúñiga, H.G., Khan, S., Garaigordobil, M. (2020). A longitudinal study of the effects of internet use on subjective well-being. Media Psychology, 23(5), 676–710. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2019.1624177

Przybylski, A.K., Weinstein, N. (2017). A large-scale test of the Goldilocks hypothesis: Quantifying the relations between digital-screen use and the mental well-being of adolescents. Psychological Science, 28(2), 204–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616678438

Ribble, M. (2015). Digital citizenship in schools: nine elements all students should know (3rd ed.). Washington DC: International Society for Technology in Education Publ.

Ryan, R.M., Deci, E.L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68

Ryff, C.D. (1995). Psychological well-being in adult life. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4(4), 99–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10772395

Schivinski, B., Brzozowska-Woś, M., Stansbury, E., Satel, J., Montag, C., Pontes, H.M. (2020). Exploring the role of social media use motives, psychological well-being, self-esteem, and affect in problematic social media use. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 617140. URL: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.617140/full (accessed: 03.12.2025).

Seland, I. (2024). Intersecting knowledge on young people’s well-being and use of digital technology across contexts: a scoping review synthesis. In: H. Holmarsdottir, I. Seland, C. Hyggen, M. Roth, (eds.). Understanding the everyday digital lives of children and young people. (pp. 433–464). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan Publ.

Seligman, M.E.P. (2011). Flourishing: A new understanding of happiness and well-being and how to achieve them. Boston: Nicholas Brealey Publ.

Shannon, H., Bush, K., Villeneuve, P.J., Hellemans, K.G., Guimond, S. (2022). Problematic social media use in adolescents and young adults: Systematic review and meta-analysis. JMIR Mental Health, 9(4), e33450. URL: https://mental.jmir.org/2022/4/e33450 (accessed: 01.12.2025).

Soldatova, G.U., Nestik, T.A., Rasskazova, E.I., Zotova, E.Y. (2013). Digital competence of teenagers and parents: results of the All-Russian research. Moscow: Foundation for Internet Development Publ. (In Russ.)

Soldatova, G.U., Rasskazova, E.I., Vishneva, A.E., Teslovskaya, O.I., Chigarkova, S.V. (2022). Born digital: family context and cognitive development. Moscow: Akropol’ Publ. (In Russ.)

Soldatova, G.U., Voiskounsky, A.E. (2021). Social-cognitive concept of digital socialization: a new ecosystem and social evolution of the mind. Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 18(3), 431–450. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8918-2021-3-431-450

Tandon, A., Dhir, A., Almugren, I., AlNemer, G.N., Mäntymäki, M. (2021). Fear of missing out (FoMO) among social media users: a systematic literature review, synthesis and framework for future research. Internet Research, 31(3), 782–821. https://doi.org/10.1108/intr-11-2019-0455

Van Dijk, J.A.G.M. (2020). The digital divide. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Vanden Abeele, M.M.P., Nguyen, M.H. (2022). Digital well-being in an age of mobile connectivity: An introduction to the Special Issue. Mobile Media and Communication, 10(2), 174–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/20501579221080899

Vuorikari, R., Kluzer, S., Punie, Y. (2022). DigComp 2.2: The digital competence framework for citizens — with new examples of knowledge, skills and attitudes. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

Vuorre, M., Przybylski, A.K. (2024a). A multiverse analysis of the associations between internet use and well-being. Technology, Mind and Behavior, 5(2). URL: https://tmb.apaopen.org/pub/a2exdqgg/release/1 (accessed: 03.12.2025).

Vuorre, M., Przybylski, A.K. (2024b). Global well-being and mental health in the Internet age. Clinical Psychological Science, 12(5), 917–935. https://doi.org/10.1177/21677026231207791

To cite this article:

Chigarkova, S.V., Soldatova, G.U.. Formula for the Digital Wellbeing of the Personality. // National Psychological Journal 2026. 1. Pages44-53. doi: 10.11621/npj.2026.0104

Copied to Clipboard

Copy