Anufrieva, A.A.
National Research University Higher School of Economics
Belyaeva, E.Y.
National Research University Higher School of Economics
Nasman, A.I.
National Research University Higher School of Economics
Gorbunova, E.S.
National Research University Higher School of Economics
Abstract
Background. Knowledge about how to interact with an object can influence the speed of its identification and categorization. This phenomenon is known as the compatibility effect (CE). Despite extensive research, views on the underlying mechanisms of CE remain inconsistent. A key research question concerns the specific object features that can activate a motor programme, as well as the range of tasks within which CE can emerge.
Objectives. The study is aimed at examining the possibility of CE occurrence in a visual search task under controlled conditions, including movement differentiation, distractor congruency, and a limited set of target stimuli (1–2 objects). An additional objective was to explore the role of object shape, orientation, and texture in the selection of a congruent motor programme and the emergence of CE during visual search.
Study Participants. Fifty-nine participants aged 18 to 30 years (M = 21.7; SD = 2.52; 44 females) took part in Experiment 1. In Experiment 2, 63 individuals aged 18 to 30 years (M = 20.3; SD = 1.77; 51 females).
Methods. In two experiments, participants performed a visual search task while executing a hand movement. It was hypothesised that the texture of the target object could influence the congruent motor programme: grasping a fresh cucumber or tomato would involve a full-hand grip (engaging all fingers), whereas interacting with pickled vegetables would be more compatible with a pinch grip (involving only two fingers). Both experiments followed a mixed design: the type of movement (grasp or pinch) was the between-subjects factor, and the combinations of texture and shape (Experiment 1), and texture and orientation (Experiment 2) were the within-subject factors. Realistic images were used as stimuli.
Results. No CE or influence of object texture (“pickling effect”) was found in the visual search task. Search performance was determined by target-distractor colour and heterogeneity, rather than by motor programme congruency. It is assumed that affordance activation requires conditions that are not achievable in a visual search context—such as the presence of a formed intention to act upon the object.
Conclusions. Knowledge about how to interact with an object does not affect attentional guidance during visual search. The role of shape, orientation, and texture in selecting a congruent motor programme is more appropriately studied in identification and categorisation tasks that involve an intention to act.
References
Andries, M., Dehban, A., Santos-Victor, J. (2020). Automatic generation of object shapes with desired affordances using VoxelGrid representation. Frontiers in Neurorobotics, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbot.2020.00022
Anufrieva, A.A., Gorbunova, E.S. (2022). Affordances as part of the process of object identification in visual search. Rossiiskii psikhologicheskii zhurnal = Russian Psychological Journal, 19(2), 188–200. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21702/rpj.2022.2.14
Anufrieva, A.A., Gorbunova, E.S. (2024a). And yet there isn't one: exploring the compatibility effect in visual search. In the Psychology of Cognition. In: I.Yu. Vladimirov, S.Yu. Korovkin, (eds.). All-Russian Scientific Conference in memory of J.S. Bruner "Psychology of Cognition" (December 6–8, 2024). (pp. 22–25). Yaroslavl: Yaroslavl State University named after P.G. Demidov Publ. (In Russ.)
Anufrieva, A.A., Gorbunova, E.S. (2024b). Ways of acting with an object as part of its representation. Sovremennaya zarubezhnaya psikhologiya = Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology, 13(1), 118–127. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/jmfp.2024130111
Azaad, S., Laham, S.M., Shields, P. (2019). A meta-analysis of the object-based compatibility effect. Cognition, 190, 105–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.04.028
Bamford, L.E., Klassen, N.R., Karl, J.M. (2020). Faster recognition of graspable targets defined by orientation in a visual search task. Experimental Brain Research, 238(4), 905–916. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-020-05769-z
Borghi, A.M., Bonfiglioli, C., Lugli, L., Ricciardelli, P., Rubichi, S., Nicoletti, R. (2007). Are visual stimuli sufficient to evoke motor information? Studies with hand primes. Neuroscience Letters, 411(1), 17–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2006.10.003
Borghi, A.M., Riggio, L. (2015). Stable and variable affordances are both automatic and flexible. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00351
Bub, D.N., Masson, M.E.J., Lin, T. (2013). Features of planned hand actions influence identification of graspable objects. Psychological Science, 24(7), 1269–1276. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612472909
Caligiore, D., Borghi, A.M., Parisi, D., Ellis, R., Cangelosi, A., Baldassarre, G. (2012). How affordances associated with a distractor object affect compatibility effects: A study with the computational model TRoPICALS. Psychological Research, 77(1), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-012-0424-1
Caravà, M., Benenti, M. (2024). Not so blue to be sad: affective affordances and expressive properties in affective regulation. Topoi, (3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-024-10037-8
Dagaev, N., Shtyrov, Y., Myachykov, A. (2016). The role of executive control in the activation of manual affordances. Psychological Research, 81(6), 1110–1124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-016-0807-9
Ellis, R., Tucker, M., Symes, E., Vainio, L. (2007). Does selecting one visual object from several require inhibition of the actions associated with nonselected objects? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(3), 670–691. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.33.3.670
Garofalo, G., Marino, B.F.M., Bellelli, S., Riggio, L. (2021). Adjectives modulate sensorimotor activation driven by nouns. Cognitive Science, 45(3), e12953. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12953
Gibson, J.J. (1988). The ecological approach to visual perception. Moscow: Progress Publ. (In Russ.)
Grasso, E.N., Strappini, F., Borghi, A.M., Scorolli, C. (2024). Affordances, aesthetics, and sustainability: on the relationship between materials, language and space in everyday object perception. Research Square, Preprint. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4143401/v2
Haddad, L., Wamain, Y., Kalenine, S. (2023). Stimulus-response compatibility effects during object semantic categorisation: Evocation of grasp affordances or abstract coding of object size? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77(1), 29–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218231161310
Harrak, M.H., Heurley, L.P., Morgado, N., Mennella, R., Dru, V. (2022). The visual size of graspable objects is needed to induce the potentiation of grasping behaviors even with verbal stimuli. Psychological Research, 86(7), 2067–2082. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-021-01635-x
Kotov, A.A., Nosov, A.V. (2017). Affordances and categories: is the compatibility effect the same with respect for objects with different categorical status? Rossiiskii zhurnal kognitivnoi nauki = The Russian Journal of Cognitive Science, 4(2–3), 39–48. (In Russ.)
Kozuch, B. (2022). Conscious vision guides motor action—rarely. Philosophical Psychology, 36(3), 443–476. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2022.2044461
Kriegel, U. (2013). Two notions of mental representation. In: U. Kriegel, (ed.). Current controversies in philosophy of mind. (pp. 161–179). New York: Routledge Publ.
Lopresti-Goodman, S.M., Frank, T.D. (2011). Negative hysteresis in affordance experiments. In the Studies in Perception and Action XI. In: E.P. Charles, L.J. Smart, (eds.). Sixteenth International Conference on Perception and Action. (pp. 152–157). Hove: Psychology Press.
Martin, A. (2015). GRAPES — Grounding representations in action, perception, and emotion systems: How object properties and categories are represented in the human brain. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 23(4), 979–990. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0842-3
Moise, N. (2022). Getting a handle on meaning: planned hand actions' influence on the identification of handled objects. Diss. M. Sci. (Psychol.). Victoria, BC.
Nako, R., Smith, T.J., Eimer, M. (2015). Activation of new attentional templates for real-world objects in visual search. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 27(5), 902–912. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00747
Osiurak, F., Rossetti, Y., Badets, A. (2017). What is an affordance? 40 years later. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 77, 403–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.04.014
Pappas, Z. (2014). Dissociating Simon and affordance compatibility effects: Silhouettes and photographs. Cognition, 133(3), 716–728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.08.018
Peirce, J.W., Gray, J., Simpson, S., MacAskill, M.R., Höchenberger, R., Sogo, H., Kastman, E.K., Lindeløv, J.K. (2019). PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy. Behavior Research Methods, 51(1), 195–203. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-01193-y
Popp, M., Trumpp, N.M., Sim, E.J., Kiefer, M. (2019). Brain activation during conceptual processing of action and sound verbs. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 15(4), 236–255. https://doi.org/10.5709/acp-0272-4
Rowe, P.J., Haenschel, C., Kosilo, M., Yarrow, K. (2017). Objects rapidly prime the motor system when located near the dominant hand. Brain and Cognition, 113, 102–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2016.11.005
Volkoff, O., Strong, D.M. (2017). Affordance theory and how to use it in IS research. In: R.D. Galliers, M.-K. Stein, (eds.). The Routledge companion to management information systems. (pp. 232–245). London: Routledge Publ.
Wolfe, J.M. (2001). Asymmetries in visual search: An introduction. Perception and Psychophysics, 63, 381–389. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194406
Wühr, P., Ansorge, U. (2004). Exploring trial-by-trial modulations of the Simon effect. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 58(4), 705–731. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724980443000269
Xenakis, I., Arnellos, A. (2012). The relation between interaction aesthetics and affordances. Design Studies, 34(1), 57–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2012.05.004
Xu, Z.J., Lleras, A., Buetti, S. (2021). Predicting how surface texture and shape combine in the human visual system to direct attention. Scientific Reports, 11, 6170. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85605-8
Yamani, Y., Ariga, A., Yamada, Y. (2016). Object affordances potentiate responses but do not guide attentional prioritization. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2015.00074
Zhuang, X., Papathomas, T.V. (2011). Cue relevance effects in conjunctive visual search: Cueing for location, color, and orientation. Journal of Vision, 11(7), 6. https://doi.org/10.1167/11.7.6
To cite this article:
Anufrieva, A.A., Belyaeva, E.Y., Nasman, A.I., Gorbunova, E.S..
The Role of Texture, Shape and Orientation of an Object in the Context of the “Compatibility Effect” of Action Performance and Target Stimuli in Visual Search. // National Psychological Journal
2025. 4. Pages142-158. doi: 10.11621/npj.2025.0411
Copied to Clipboard
Copy
