ISSN 2079-6617
eISSN 2309-9828
Contribution of A.V. Zaporozhets and L.A. Venger to the Solution of Methodological Issues in Child and General Psychology

Contribution of A.V. Zaporozhets and L.A. Venger to the Solution of Methodological Issues in Child and General Psychology

PDF (Rus)

Recieved: 03/12/2025

Accepted: 04/24/2025

Published: 06/23/2025

Keywords: child psychology; learning; development; perception; assimilation; mediation

Pages: 8-16

DOI: 10.11621/npj.2025.0301

Available online: 19.06.2025

To cite this article:

Veraksa, N.E. (2025). Contribution of A.V. Zaporozhets and L.A. Venger to the Solution of Methodological Issues in Child and General Psychology. National Psychological Journal, 20(3) , 8-16. https://doi.org/10.11621/npj.2025.0301

Copied to Clipboard

Copy
Issue 3, 2025

Veraksa, N.E. Lomonosov Moscow State University

Abstract

Background. The article is the analysis of methodological provisions expressed by A.V. Zaporozhets and L.A. Venger in relation to the understanding of the structure of psychological means. The publication reveals the relevance of considering the phenomenon of mediation in the context of cultural-historical theory and activity theory.

Objective
. The goal is to show the dialectical nature of the approaches of A.V. Zaporozhets and L.A. Venger in the analysis of three problems: the role of assimilation in perception, the transformation of the non-mental into the mental, and the relationship between learning and development.

Methods
. The work is of a theoretical nature. Structural-dialectical analysis was used as a research method, the main attention was paid to the analysis of the works of L.S. Vygotsky, L.A. Venger, P.Ya. Galperin, A.V. Zaporozhets and A.N. Leontiev.

Results
. The article shows that the analysis of the problems posed was carried out by A.V. Zaporozhets and L.A. Venger in the context of two theories: the cultural-historical theory by L.S. Vygotsky and the theory of activity by A.N. Leontiev. The idea of assimilation retains its relevance today. It is associated with an explanation of the mechanism of perception as the construction of an image of perception from the material that the subject has. For A.N. Leontiev, the sensory tissue was such material, which mediates the sensory image and the subject’s objective activity. The idea of assimilation as a mechanism for constructing a perceptual image was shared by both A.V. Zaporozhets and L.A. Wenger, but the material from which the image was built differed from that considered by A.N. Leontiev. A.V. Zaporozhets and L.A. Wenger studied the process of transformation of the non-mental into the mental as the interiorization of external forms of activity into the internal ones. According to P.Ya. Galperin, speech utterance plays a key role in the processes of interiorization. L.A. Wenger showed that in preschool age the process of interiorization can take place without the participation of speech. In modern preschool education, as shown in the article, the problem of the relationship between learning and development remains relevant. One of the directions for its solution is characterized by the fusion of learning and development. It is expressed in the fact that with the help of play activities an attempt is made to solve the tasks of educational activity.

Conclusions
. A.V. Zaporozhets and L.A. Wenger not only addressed the tasks of child psychology, but also analyzed the fundamental issues of psychology, based on the position that the analysis of the genesis of the child’s psyche is a way of studying the problems of general psychology.

References

Bauer, T. (1979). Mental development of the infant. Moscow: Progress Publ. (In Russ.)

Breathnach, H., Danby, S., O’Gorman, L. (2017). ‘Are you working or playing?’ Investigating young children’s perspectives of classroom activities. International Journal of Early Years Education, 25(4), 439–454. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2017.1316241

Bukhalenkova, D.A., Chichinina, E.A. (2023). Features of the development of imagination in preschoolers playing digital games of different types. Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Psikhologiya i pedagogika = Bulletin of Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia. Series: Psychology and Pedagogy, 20(3), 482–500. (In Russ.).

http://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1683-2023-20-3-482-500 Corsaro, W. (2011). The sociology of childhood (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge Press.

Gal’perin, P.Ya. (2023). Psychology: Subject and Method. Selected Psychological Works. Moscow: Moscow Univ. Press. (In Russ.)

Gavrilova, M.N., Sukhikh, V.L., Veresov, N.N. (2023). Toy Preferences among 3-to-4-Year-Old Children: The Impact of Socio-Demographic Factors and Developmental Characteristics. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 16(2), 72–84. https://doi.org/10.11621/pir.2023.0206

Gegel’, G.V.F. (1972). The Science of Logic: in 3 vols. Vol. 3. Moscow: Mysl’ Publ. (In Russ.)

Howard, J., McInnes, K. (2013). The impact of children’s perception of an activity as play rather than not play on emotional well-being. Child: Care, Health & Development, 39(5), 737–742. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2214.2012.01405.x

Lektorskii, V.A. (2023). Psychological Theory of Activity by A.N. Leontiev and Modern Cognitive Research. Lomonosov Psychology Journal, 46(2), 67–83. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.11621/LPJ-23-16

Leont’ev, A.N. (1972). Problems of Psyche Development. Moscow: Moscow Univ. Press. (In Russ.)

Leont’ev, A.N. (2004). Activity. Consciousness. Personality. Moscow: Smysl Publ.; Academy Publishing Center. (In Russ.)

Leont’ev, A.N. (2009). Psychological Foundations of Child Development and Learning. Moscow: Smysl Publ. (In Russ.)

Maksimova, T.G. (1985). Development of correction of practical action. In: N.N. Poddyakov, A.F. Govorkova, (eds.). Development of thinking and mental education of preschoolers. (pp. 84–99). Moscow: Pedagogy Publ. (In Russ.)

Nicole, M.G., Camilla, J.K., Nicholas, L.H., John, C.S. (2012). Meanings of play among children.Childhood, 20(2), 185–199. https:// doi.org/10.1177/0907568212454751

Rubtsov, V.V., Zaretskii, V.K., Maidanskii, A.D. (2024). One hundred years of development of cultural-historical psychology: milestones and directions. Kul’turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya = Cultural-Historical Psychology, 20(3), 5–11. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2024200301

Sandberg, A. (2002). Children’s concepts of teachers’ ways of relating to play. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 27(4), 18–23.

Sandberg, A., Broström, S., Johansson, I., Frøkjær, T., Kieferle, C. et al. (2017). Children’s perspective on learning: An international study in Denmark, Estonia, Germany and Sweden. Early Childhood Education Journal, 45(1), 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643- 015-0759-5

Stephen, C., Brown, S. (2004). The culture of practice in pre-school provision: Outsider and insider perspectives. Research Papers in Education, 19(3), 323–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267152042000247990

Theobald, M., Danby, S., Einarsdóttir, J., Bourne, J., Jones, D. et al. (2015). Children’s perspectives of play and learning for educational practice. Education Sciences, 5(4), 345–362. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci5040345

Venger, L.A. (1969). Perception and learning. Moscow: Enlightenment Publ. (In Russ.)

Venger, L.A., Zinchenko, V.P. (1986). On the creative path of A.V. Zaporozhets. In: V.P. Zaporozhets, (ed.). Selected psychological works: in 2 vol. Vol. I. Mental development of the child. (pp. 6–23). Moscow: Pedagogy Publ. (In Russ.)

Veraksa, N.E. (2024). History of Psychology: a tutorial. Moscow: Moscow Univ. Press. (In Russ.)

Vygotskii, L.S. (1996). Lectures on Pedology. Izhevsk: Udmurt University Publ. (In Russ.)

Wing, L. (1995). Play is not the work of the child: Young children’s perceptions of work and play. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 10, 223–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/0885-2006(95)90005-5

Zaporozhets, A.V. (1986a). Selected psychological works: in 2 vol. Vol. 1. Mental development of the child. Moscow: Pedagogy Publ. (In Russ.)

Zaporozhets, A.V. (1986b). Selected psychological works: in 2 vol. Vol. 2. Development of voluntary movements. Moscow: Pedagogy Publ. (In Russ.)

Zaporozhets, A.V. (2004). Discussion of the problems of activity. In: A.N. Leontiev. Activity. Consciousness. Personality. (pp. 319–323). Moscow: Smysl Publ. (In Russ.)

Zaporozhets, A.V., Velichkovskii, B.M. (1979). Preface. In: T. Bauer. Mental development of the infant. (pp. 5–10). Moscow: Progress Publ. (In Russ.)

Zhdan, A.N., Sokolova, E.E. (2023). The Deed, Thought, and Word of Alexei Nikolaevich Leontiev. Lomonosov Psychology Journal, 46(2), 23–45. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.11621/LPJ-23-14

Zinchenko, V.P. (2013). Psychology of action. Contribution of the Kharkov psychological school. Kul’turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya = Cultural-Historical Psychology, 9(1), 92–107. (In Russ.)
To cite this article:

Veraksa, N.E. . Contribution of A.V. Zaporozhets and L.A. Venger to the Solution of Methodological Issues in Child and General Psychology. // National Psychological Journal 2025. 3. Pages8-16. doi: 10.11621/npj.2025.0301

Copied to Clipboard

Copy