ISSN 2079-6617 (Print)
ISSN 2309-9828 (Online)
Национальный психологический журнал

Keywords

MainKeywords

validation

Publications

Filter
En:
DOI:
  

Melnikova O.T., Krichevets A.N., Gusev A.N., Busygina N.P., Khoroshilov D.A., Barskiy F.I. (2014). Criteria for the evaluation of qualitative research. National Psychological Journal (14), 49-51

In this paper we develop the criteria for evaluating scientific and academic publications and such qualification works, as diplomas, master theses and Ph. D. theses carried out using qualitative methods. The criteria are the result of a research seminar on qualitative methods held by A.N. Krichevets and O.T. Melnikova at the Department of Psychology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia. The detailed steps are described and corresponding standards of planning research, preparing the target and theoretical sample, collecting and analyzing quality data, interpreting and presenting results are shown. Particular attention is given to such criteria as transparency of result interpretation, result analysis documentation, validity, availability of author’s reflexive position in the text and availability of respondents’ judgements and opinions. In addition, we show the necessity of choosing methods for analyzing the results (e.g. thematic analysis, grounded theory method, hermeneutic or descriptive phenomenology, narrative and discourse analysis), how they conform to the goals and objectives of the research, and also the adequacy of studying a particular subject area.

We discuss the key validation strategies included into the research process (validation by respondents, analysis of deviant cases, triangulation, etc.), ethical principles and sampling, communicating with respondents, working with their personal data. Developing “quality standards” is an important factor in establishing a qualitative research in the Russian national science of psychology.

Received: 12/02/2014

Accepted: 12/05/2014

Pages: 49-51

DOI: 10.11621/npj.2014.0206

Keywords: qualitative research; validation; validity criteria; validation strategy;

By: ; ; ; ; ;