ISSN 2079-6617
eISSN 2309-9828
Articles

Article

MainArticlesVolumes

Litvinov V.Yu. (2020).Impact of mass media in shaping the image of Russian region in the youth’s general worldview. National Psychological Journal, [Natsional’nyy psikhologicheskiy zhurnal], (13)2,158–169.

Abstract

Background. Our understanding of the world is largely based on the image of the native state, i.e. 'a small homeland' that shapes the development of a person, and identifies their social identity. The development of the information society provides more and more powerful tools for the media to influence the recipient's view of the world and representations of the human society as a whole. A man has to get all the information about the territory of the rest of their country, except for'the small homeland', via the media content. This content is cropped up with stereotypes and leads to the disintegration of society. Therefore, it is important to study the features of such media influence, their strength and validity.

Objective is to study regional images of Russia among young people from different Russian regions, and to identify the media role in shaping of regional images and image of Russia as a whole.

Design. This pilot research has a limited sample. 30 recipients (Mage=22.6 years, SD=2.78; 11 males from 15 regions of Russia) took part in this research.

The methods included a survey and a series of detailed interviews, psycho-semantic scaling and projective methods. The psycho-semantic research assumed description of the following regional images: the North of Russia, Central Russia, the South of Russia, the Northern Caucasus, the Volga region, the Urals, Siberia, the Far East.

Results. It is shown statistically that participants of the research tend to evaluate their personal views differently from those that, they believe, are shaped through the media. The images generated by the media are rather positive and point mainly to the advantages of territories, not to mention their possible disadvantages. The majority of respondents have very little personal experience of interacting with Russian regions. Their understanding of regions mainly correspond to the regional images shaped through the media. Moreover, these images are stereotypes and highlight the emotional side. A categorical structure of the perception significantly differs in factor content from the structures shown in the study results of an integral image of Russia and separate states (Matveeva, 2010; Mitina, Petrenko, 2009). It has its own specific features and is not reduced in the aggregate to the overall image of Russia.

Conclusion. When building regional images and the overall image of Russia, the respondents focus on the moral evaluation which helps to construct their personal image, and then they go on with the representations shaped through the media. These image of Russian region differ from the overall image of Russia. The paper represents the results of a pilot study, therefore, the results can hardly be extrapolated to a wider sample, but they can be considered in further research.

Received: 05/05/2020
Accepted: 05/16/2020
Pages: 158-169
DOI: 10.11621/npj.2020.0212

PDF: Download

Keywords: worldview; regional identity; media influence; cognitive map of Russia; youth from different regions of Russia; psycho-semantic scaling; image of Russia

Available Online 06.10.2020

Table 1. Friedman's criterion for identifying differences between individual representations about the Russian region and media image

N

30

Chi-Square

4,455

Degree of Freedom

1

Asymptotic* Value

,035


*p<0,05.

Тablе 2. Content of the categorical structure of the representations of the Russian regions (in the whole sample)

Factor 1 (39%)
Moral Value

Weight

Factor 2 (26%)
Esthetic Value

Weight

Kind - Mean

96*

Merry - sad

94

Simple-Complicated

94

Bright - Dull

92

Compromise - principled

94

Dirty-clean

86

Merciful - cruel

90

Thriving - Dying

85

Simple-minded -Tricky

90

Open - closed

83

Safe - Dangerous

84

Cozy-spacious

75

Peaceful - Pugnacious

82

Lazy - Hardworking

65

Multiplying - Wasteful

82

 

 

Native-Alien

81

 

 

Reliable - Unreliable

74

 

 

Hardworking - Lazy

65

 

 

Factor 3 (14%)
Traditional Values

Weight

Factor 4 (12%)
Power and Strenth

Weight

Spiritual - Material

91

Mighty - Infirm

95

Ugly - Beautiful

82

Strong - Weak

92

Backward - Progressive

81

Authoritative - Non-authoritative

73

Generous - Greedy

78

Independent - Dependent

62

Chaste - Depraved

76

 

 

Religious-Atheistic

67

 

 

Independent - Dependent

62

 

 

Factor 5 (6%)
Patriotism

Weight

 

 

Patriotic - Unpatriotic

78

 

 

Similar to others - Original

76

 

 

Authoritative - Non-authoritative

59

 

 

* Scale weight in Factor.

Fig. 1. Representation of the Russian regions in the youth.

Table 3. Frequency analysis of references
to various macro-regions

Macroregion

Number

Siberia

21

North of Russia

18

Far East

15

Central Russia

13

Urals

7

South of Russia

4

North Caucasus

4

Volga region

3

Fig. 2. Substantive content of representations of the Russian regions

For citing this article:

Litvinov V.Yu. (2020).Impact of mass media in shaping the image of Russian region in the youth’s general worldview. National Psychological Journal, [Natsional’nyy psikhologicheskiy zhurnal], (13)2,158–169.